Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Felon gets 99 years for stealing cell phone
Associated Press ^ | July 11, 2005

Posted on 07/11/2005 1:08:03 PM PDT by Dog Gone

WACO — A man has been sentenced to 99 years in prison for stealing a cell phone.

Glenn Alvin Reed, 31, was convicted of robbery Thursday for stealing a cellular phone from a man's truck last fall and then hitting him several times when he demanded its return.

Jurors, who deliberated about 15 minutes, convicted Reed as a habitual criminal because he has prior felony convictions for injury to an elderly person and robbery. That bumped the minimum sentence from five to 25 years for Reed, who rejected a 15-year plea bargain offer from prosecutors.

Reed also has 15 misdemeanor convictions dating to 1991, including 12 criminal trespassing convictions.

Reed, who testified during his trial against the wishes of his court-appointed attorneys, frequently went into profanity-laced tirades and told jurors he didn't care if they gave him life in prison.

"There's things I choose to do, like, if I go in a store and choose to take a Snicker's bar," Reed testified. "If you catch me, you catch me. If not, I'm going to go home and eat it up and go on about my business, dog."

Four years ago, Reed walked up behind retired Texas Ranger Capt. Bob Prince outside the McLennan County courthouse annex and said he was robbing him. Prince decided not to shoot Reed because he could tell he was unarmed, the former Ranger testified during Reed's cell phone robbery trial.

Prince easily took Reed into custody, and he later was sentenced to two years in prison, according to court records.

Reed made an obscene hand gesture toward Prince as the former Ranger left the witness stand.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: headlinefraud; lyingbyommission; mediabias; mediasensationalism; niceheadline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2005 1:08:04 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Nice headline! Editor just forgot to mention that the thief beat the crap out of the cellphone's owner while committing the crime...
2 posted on 07/11/2005 1:09:32 PM PDT by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I love how the title "forgets" to mention the assault.


3 posted on 07/11/2005 1:09:47 PM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Stupid is as stupid does. It's great they got this thug off the street.


4 posted on 07/11/2005 1:10:08 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Jurors, who deliberated about 15 minutes, convicted Reed as a habitual criminal

So it takes thirteen minutes to do double elimiantion rock-papers-sissors to pick the jury foreman, one minute to vote, and then one minute to walk back. Gotta love Texas

5 posted on 07/11/2005 1:11:14 PM PDT by pikachu (What if there were no more hypothetical questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Can you hear me now?


6 posted on 07/11/2005 1:13:04 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Good jury.


7 posted on 07/11/2005 1:13:46 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; mikrofon
He who steals my name steals trash.

He who steals my cell phone steals gold.

8 posted on 07/11/2005 1:15:59 PM PDT by martin_fierro (Or something like that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

What a complete idiot. He deserves the sentence he got.


9 posted on 07/11/2005 1:16:31 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This ain't your granddaddy's America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Next time, he should stick to stealing classified documents and destroying them.


10 posted on 07/11/2005 1:17:16 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pikachu
I think the deliberations went something like this:

Jury foreman: "Okay, everyone. Now that we're seated, how does 99 years sound to everyone?"

Juror 1: "Yep."

Jurors 2-11: "Yeehaw!"

11 posted on 07/11/2005 1:18:07 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Shalom Israel

Hmmm. My question for the editor of the paper is why the opening parapgraph didn't ask the question as to how it was that this savage was on the streets at all? Why hasn't he already been sentenced to 99 years for the dozen plus crimes that he has already committed?

All I can say is thank goodness that fellow in the truck had a cell phone to steal so the people of Texas could finally put this vermin away for good!


12 posted on 07/11/2005 1:18:33 PM PDT by markedman (Lay me down to a watery grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"If you catch me, you catch me. If not, I'm going to go home and eat it up and go on about my business, dog."

I hope you enjoy prison, dog.

13 posted on 07/11/2005 1:22:13 PM PDT by BostonianRightist (I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

This guy is unrepentant and a career criminal. Nevertheless it is wrong to sentence someone to life in jail for stealing a cell phone and hitting someone. He deserves to go to jail, but the punishment does not fit the crime here, and I think that's unjust. Life in prison should be reserved for murderers, traitors, kidnappers, terrorists or rapists.

Many will disagree and that's okay.


14 posted on 07/11/2005 1:22:30 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"If you catch me, you catch me. If not, I'm going to go home and eat it up and go on about my business, dog."

I guess the jury wasn't swayed by his obvious charm. LOL.

15 posted on 07/11/2005 1:22:35 PM PDT by Blue Champagne (Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

This is why they should bring back caning. They should inflict physical pain on some criminals. It's the only thing they understand. Life if physical.

25 years in prison at the expense of the taxpayers @ 25K a year is $625,000 for a $300 cell phone? Granted the guy should be off the street, bus isn't there something cheaper we could use. How about multiple canings over a few years to make the guy regret and remember?

I'm sure the "liberals", the ACLU and Amnesty Intl. would love it


16 posted on 07/11/2005 1:24:33 PM PDT by garyhope (moules et frites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Reed, who testified during his trial against the wishes of his court-appointed attorneys, frequently went into profanity-laced tirades and told jurors he didn't care if they gave him life in prison.

Note to self... Profanity-laced tirades do not help sway a jury.

17 posted on 07/11/2005 1:25:25 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

There's nothing like reading and posting on FR using a Treo!


18 posted on 07/11/2005 1:26:33 PM PDT by Vision Thing (Hillary is a mad cow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone
"There's things I choose to do, like, if I go in a store and choose to take a Snicker's bar," Reed testified. "If you catch me, you catch me. If not, I'm going to go home and eat it up and go on about my business, dog."

The only reason this guy would say something like this to a jury is because he wants to be in prison.

Seriously.

He's evidently more comfortable there than on the outside.

20 posted on 07/11/2005 1:28:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson