Has Boxer noticed the millions of unborn citizens who have been slaughtered since Roe v. Wade became the law of the land?
That's just what I was going to write. Doesn't Boxer realize the irony of her statement?
Pro life = death.
What goes on in the synapses of these socialists that leads them to always arrive at the wrong conclusion?
How do they ignore the millions of deaths causes by the pro death position??.....oops, I meant pro choice of course.
Dr. Nathanson's expose has been extensively linked on FR a while back. Very good reading.
Barbara Boxer...the biggest babykiller in the US Senate. She's terminally embarrassing.
We need to remind them (and ourselves, obviously) that WE WON!!! We are the majority, WE WON!!!!!!
Winners = US!!!
Losers = THEM!!!
Can her reputation get any lower?
'...Barbara Boxer needs to make a retraction."
Yeah. That'll happen.
"Very clearly, Senator Boxer is doing this to try to scare people into supporting a more liberal justice to the Supreme Court."
For STARTERS it's the PRESIDENT who gets to pick BECAUSE HE WON! Special interest groups, and everyday people really have no say in the matter, lest we come from states that have Senators and Congresscritters that actually abide by and support what we believe in. (Sadly, I do not fall amongst those lucky few; I have Kohl, Baldwin & Feingold "representin'" me. Barf!)
Secondly, when you have no platform other than one of death and destruction to children and the nuclear family, I guess ya gotta beat the sheeple over the head with scare tactics.
I can't remember a time in my relatively short history when Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Democrats were more repugnant to me. Maybe I'm just paying too much attention to them these days when what they need is to just be swatted away like flies on the picnic potato salad?
If anyone has the transcript from Rush's excellent slam of Boxer, please post it here. Also, his answer to the gentle lib caller in the same hour was equally as fine.
Oh nooooo. All the American women are gonna DIE!!! The earths gonna freeze...er....burn up....er something, and we're all gonna DIE!!! Everyone is out of work, so we're all gonna have to eat dirt and DIE!!!!!! And.......
Hey. Wait a minute. She didn't say anything about all the beautiful babies that would be saved. She's got it all backwards again. Millions would be saved.
Now, either Barbara Boxer is too stupid to recognize this fact, or she does realize it but she's hysterically lying in order to whip her base into a froth. She's capable of either possibility.
Hmmmm?? Why has the democrat party lost it's strength .. all the new recruits are in the garbage cans in back of the abortion clinics.
I belive the number is 40 MILLION babies. How many deadly diseases will not be cured; how many great minds were never allowed to develop; how many great inventions were lost; how many new technologies will never be developed; how many preachers never fulfilled their calling.
Thomas Jefferson capsulized a premise underlying our Declaration of Independence and Constitution:
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."
For two almost hundred years, this premise served as America's guard against tyrannical forms of government, as well as the tyranny of individuals who would seek to deny the people's rights or to enslave them under the guise of protecting them.
John F. Kennedy's 1961 Inaugural Address included this assertion of that premise: "The world is different now. . . And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God."
In the decades since 1961, however, a new and different kind of challenge to that premise has been imposed upon us.
At the time of Kennedy's Inauguration and before, most citizens never had seen a few-weeks-old infant in the womb; and few could conceive that one could be a completely-formed little human being.
Human knowledge had not yet developed the science and technology for viewing and observing life and activities the womb.
It was easy for the word “fetus” to become used as a non-personal way of describing what we could not visualize or observe. And, we did not recognize the potential political trickery of such a use of semantics by those who might be intent on making basic changes in the laws and protections of our Constitution.
Science and technology of the last few decades, however, have opened to our observation the very earliest stages of human development, through live photography. More recently, we have seen examples of a baby in such an early stage, weighing only ounces, delivered and thriving, full of potential as a future leader, scientist, or artist.
With the cameras available to us, we now can see a completely-formed little person, and we know that what is only weeks old, if allowed to develop either inside or outside the womb, is an individual human being whose right to life, rights and liberty must be “destroyed” by the hand of force in order to be denied.
The time is now for confronting the fundamental question about life and liberty addressed by Jefferson and Kennedy (as well as others of America’s Founders and Presidents), with a cognizance that our answer will impact upon every dimension of our liberty, for if we separate ourselves from the foundation, then no rights can be said to be secure.
Either the rights and liberty of human beings are grants of the Creator, or they are grants from other imperfect human beings, or in this case, one class of citizens--women--who, themselves, claim a "grant" of that so-called "right to choose" with the complicity and aid of the "hand of force" (the judiciary) within their government.
Which is it to be?
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Boxer is wrong, of course:
The CORRECT figure is that 5 BILLION unborn feminazis will die.