Posted on 07/07/2005 12:41:17 PM PDT by StrangerInParadise
Were we right or were we right when we said that the mindset of Karen Finley, the vulgarian "performance artist," had taken over the Angry Left? Check out this report from the San Francisco Chronicle:
A dozen anti-war activists from Mendocino County took their tops off at high noon in San Francisco's Union Square shopping district Thursday, using what they said was their best weapon to get the public's attention. . . .
Members of the Breasts Not Bombs contingent, which included seven women, three men and two young girls, said the war in Iraq is indecent, not their nakedness. . . .
Breasts Not Bombs said they are trying to make people uncomfortable to get their anti-war message across and to also desensitize people to nudity.
Of course, as we noted last month, such shock tactics "make people uncomfortable" only insofar as they fail to "desensitize" them.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
LOL
I just never get tired of that pic! Classic!
Excellent! The first post I've seen here where someone has managed to utilize the late, great Phil Hartman.
Thats what hit me also.
First, gay, then cross ... now ped ...
are there no laws?
I'm glad you posted that picture. I suddenly feel like the most beautiful woman on the planet. I just feel sorry for the ugly stick that had to touch her during that beating.
Eye rolling here! (From your info. not for you).
Thanks for the laugh!
Ummm, I might question that assertion with hooters that big!
"God, I hate this city!" said one, rushing away.
So do a lot of people, including those of us who have never been there!
Several tourists said the protest irked them not because of the adults, but because Glaser's 9-year-old daughter and the girl's 10-year-old friend, were also bare-chested. The girls brought their half-naked dolls to the protest, too.
"I took a picture but made sure the girls weren't in the frame," said Matt Bigos of Boston, in town for his brother's wedding.
"You can't put that kind of picture on your computer these days ... you'll get busted. I really don't think it's right they have little girls without shirts."
Now, tell me why these idiots aren't hauled away for making children expose themselves?
Aim low, boys.....
Aim low....
It took about a week for the swelling to go down.
She has more pit hair than I do.
Apparently about 10 years ago, some schmuck got really drunk, but not quite enough to pass out before he made a really nasty mistake!
How come you never see Pamela Anderson types at these events?
Love the underarm hair...
That can't be a woman.
Doesn't anyone else think its very wrong to strip your little girls naked and bring them with you?
A grown woman is bad enough. But girls of 10 year old girls...that's bad news, and wildly immoral to abuse them for political gain like that.
Thats the funny thing. The people at these "protests" would
never be looked at otherwise. These people are society's forgotten. This is their way of making sure you HAVE to notice them. People like Pam Anderson don't need this; they actually have lives. And yes I'm a Pam Fan. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.