Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chemical Test IDs Currency Associated with Drugs
Scientific American ^ | July 6, 2005 | Sarah Graham

Posted on 07/06/2005 9:57:14 PM PDT by Quick1

Scientists have developed a new weapon for the war on drugs: a novel method for tracing the illicit substances on currency. Study results indicate that the pattern of contamination on money recovered from drug-related crime scenes is significantly different than that seen on notes in regular circulation.

Previous studies had revealed that many bank notes around the world contain trace amounts of cocaine, but contamination with other controlled substances is still relatively rare. In the new work, Karl Ebejer of Mass Spec Analytical Ltd. in Bristol, U.K., and his colleagues analyzed currency using mass spectrometry to look for a fingerprint of the chemical diacetylmorphine (DAM), an active component of heroin. The researchers exposed money recovered in a police raid to high temperatures that cause many compounds to vaporize. The gas was then fed into a mass spectrometer, which separates fragmented chemicals according to mass. Because certain chemicals routinely break into the same fragments, scientists can determine which molecules were present by searching for specific pieces. For example, to identify DAM on the bank notes, the team searched for two particular ions.

The new approach is sensitive enough to allow analysis of single bills, an improvement over other methods that must test entire bundles at once to detect what might be very small amounts of chemicals. Identifying more individual bills that are contaminated reduces the likelihood that a person came into possession of them by chance, the authors argue. "The association doesn't prove guilt," Ebejer cautions, "but cries out for an explanation. If a defendant can offer no reasonable explanation as to why they possess a large quantity of cash and why this cash is highly contaminated with heroin, a jury must draw its own conclusions." The findings appear in the latest issue of the journal Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. --Sarah Graham


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: cash; court; drugs; fifthamendment; money
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Interesting, but the most terrifying statement is bolded by me. If you happen to have cash that is contaminated, you must be guilty!
1 posted on 07/06/2005 9:57:14 PM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

You might be interested in this.


2 posted on 07/06/2005 10:01:23 PM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

So what happens if a drug dealer spends some money, and it's circulated back?


3 posted on 07/06/2005 10:04:48 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
>>"If a defendant can offer no reasonable explanation as to why they possess a large quantity of cash and why this cash is highly contaminated with heroin, a jury must draw its own conclusions."

>Interesting, but the most terrifying statement is bolded by me. If you happen to have cash that is contaminated, you must be guilty!

And not only that, it inverts the presumption of "guilty until proven innocent" making an innocent person responsible for proving his innocence and sending the Fifth Amendment's protection against not having to testify to "prove" your innocence up in flames to boot. It is so wrong. The government has to prove you are guilty, you shouldn't have to prove your innocence.

4 posted on 07/06/2005 10:10:35 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1; CindyDawg; FreedomCalls

I guess this means we will all have to launder our money.
Sorry, couldn't resist!


5 posted on 07/06/2005 10:27:28 PM PDT by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

It's the usual WOD Gestapo mentality. After all, if you have nothing to hide, what are you worried about?


6 posted on 07/06/2005 10:40:29 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

If they test it for urine, the results would sicken most people.


7 posted on 07/06/2005 10:44:28 PM PDT by endthematrix ("an ominous vacancy" fills this space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
the most terrifying statement is bolded by me

...terrifying ?

Quite the drama queen you is.

8 posted on 07/06/2005 10:44:50 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
If they test it for urine, the results would sicken most people.

Not as much as a test for feces, I would guess...

9 posted on 07/06/2005 10:52:57 PM PDT by Sparticus (She's so open minded that her brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

This reminds me of an dated (Cold War era) joke my youngest son is fond of:

(spoken with a thick Russian accent) "In America, money is paper with tiny amounts of cocaine. In Soviet Russia, money does not exist."

(Sophomoric, for sure, but he's a high school sophomore.)


10 posted on 07/06/2005 10:59:59 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

They do not have to charge you with a crime to take your 'contaminated' money. They've been doing this for years with cocaine. This just adds another drug to the game.
...


11 posted on 07/06/2005 11:06:00 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

Mobsters may be using biotechnology to give new meaning to the phrase dirty money, fear FBI agents investigating a suspected drugs operation in Pennsylvania. Detectives are awaiting laboratory test results on a $250,000 stash of banknotes seized from a car in Philadelphia this month after two police officers who made the arrest became ill.

One required hospital treatment after breaking into a sealed plastic bag to count the money, thought to be the proceeds from a drugs deal involving the Russian mob. Crime experts are concerned gangsters have found a novel way of protecting cash during transit by coating it with bacteria.

http://www.arkhospitals.org/snow%2002-24-05.html

*Now that is some DIRTY money!


12 posted on 07/06/2005 11:20:34 PM PDT by endthematrix ("an ominous vacancy" fills this space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

This bothers me as well. Then I realize it will be a long time before I have more than a twenty in my wallet.


13 posted on 07/06/2005 11:48:20 PM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

How did the smugglers propose to rid the money of germs once it had reached its intended destination?


14 posted on 07/07/2005 2:03:05 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
If a defendant can offer no reasonable explanation as to why they possess a large quantity of cash and why this cash is highly contaminated with heroin, a jury must draw its own conclusions."

The person ahead of me in line at the bank is a drug dealer and deposits a couple thousand dollars. My turn comes and I withdraw a couple thousand dollars.
Guess that would automatically make me a drug dealer.
15 posted on 07/07/2005 3:34:28 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
They do not have to charge you with a crime to take your 'contaminated' money.

No, a “reasonable suspicion” is all that is needed to seize the cash.
16 posted on 07/07/2005 3:37:38 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Software to monitor cash deposits from legit businesses has been in place for decades. Looking for deviations in historical deposits.

This only could provide suspicion of laundering, not proof of drug related origin. This test would add another indicator and would identify the clean front businesses that launder the huge cash income from drugs .
17 posted on 07/07/2005 4:27:14 AM PDT by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
How did the smugglers propose to rid the money of germs once it had reached its intended destination?

Maybe put it in the oven and bake it for a while.

18 posted on 07/07/2005 4:31:10 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
I recently read that a large percentage of 20's and 100's in general circulation is contaminated with cocaine.

I guess we all need to prepare for that knock on the door since some of our currency is "probable cause".

19 posted on 07/07/2005 5:22:55 AM PDT by capt. norm (Two wrongs do not make a right. It usually takes me at least three..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
If you happen to have cash that is contaminated, you must be guilty!

You probably wouldn't be charged with a crime, but your cash would be gone. Nothing new here. It's been going on for at least a decade. Check out Volusia County, Florida and St. Martens Parish, LA. I've read stories about both in recent years where they are siezing large quantities of money they find in routine traffic stops, but no crime was ever charged. They cite cocaine residue on the money as the reason. Undoubtedly it is happening elsewhere.

The problem is the Treasury Department says that roughly 80% of the $20's, $50's and $100's in circulation have cocaine residue on them........

Just because you have a large amount of cash on you doesn't mean you are a drug dealer. Typical WOD/prohibition hysteria.....

20 posted on 07/07/2005 6:21:36 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson