Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legislation would protect employees from sexual orientation discrimination
GOVexec.com ^ | July 6, 2005 | By Daniel Pulliam

Posted on 07/06/2005 9:44:01 AM PDT by Calpernia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Calpernia
I get my rocks off by sitting around all day reading FreeRepublic. I'm just oriented that way. I guess this law means I should get a governement job.
21 posted on 07/06/2005 10:47:35 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republican2005
great next they'll be demanding quotas for gays.

That may not be a bad idea. Say a ten day season with no bag limit. Should really reduce the problem.

OH! You mean hiring quotas don't you. (never mind)

22 posted on 07/06/2005 10:51:24 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

How about a bill to bar employers from sexual orientation discrimination lawsuits? God forbid a so-called Conservative even propse such a bill. Do we have any of those left in the Conress anyway?


23 posted on 07/06/2005 10:51:47 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Why don't insurance carriers start refusing to insure gay people? Their lifestyles put them in the "at risk" category. Just like smokers are now labeled as 'at risk'.
24 posted on 07/06/2005 11:02:48 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Later horrible pingout.


25 posted on 07/06/2005 11:05:32 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Does it include protections for heterosexuals?


26 posted on 07/06/2005 11:06:37 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron

There are - you can go underground or out of business. These people are not kidding, and they target businesses and people they consider enemies of their agenda.

Recently - within the last week - there have been several articles about a family run inn located in Vermont who are being sued (hmm - brain malfuction alarm tells me it might be a criminal matter of discrimination, not a civil suit, but either way it is bad bad bad) by a couple of lesbians. Reason? The owner - who is Catholic, and lives at the inn with his wife and several children - said he would have a hard time getting enthusiastic about hosting a wedding reception for the two lesbians. (The inn proprietors host several wedding receptions a year.)

The lesbians are targeting this family because, as Catholics, they are "not enthusiastic" about helping two women have a wedding reception.


27 posted on 07/06/2005 11:14:27 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
nudist is one correlation. How about the current demonetizing of smokers, when that is a legal commodity, and elevating a life style which is 100 times more a health threat, and a health threat that can spread disease to the general public when working in certain fields, ie: food prep, health care, etc. Not to mention the cost comparison for health insurance in both "behaviors". There is no comparison. I know a lot of good moral people with integrity and values who smoke, they are demonetized, while we are expected to elevate and protect homosexuals!! Way way out of whack!!
28 posted on 07/06/2005 11:28:03 AM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks very much for the links! I'll save them and read them.


29 posted on 07/06/2005 11:33:05 AM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Here is another goal that they have accomplished:

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


30 posted on 07/06/2005 11:35:02 AM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

It is surreal how many of the goals have been accomplished.

::away from keyboard::

Ciao!


31 posted on 07/06/2005 11:39:43 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
elevating a life style which is 100 times more a health threat

Right on. Consider the questionnaire you are given when you donate blood... if you are a man, have you ever had sex, EVEN ONCE, with another man since 1977? ... if so, we don't want your blood, it's worthless. You are as risky as an IV drug user.

32 posted on 07/06/2005 11:43:00 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
The lesbians are targeting this family because, as Catholics, they are "not enthusiastic" about helping two women have a wedding reception.<<<

I'd host one, one time. The service would be substandard (let them prove it was purposeful), I'd make sure many things that CAN go wrong at any reception..WOULD go wrong at Theirs..

Or, I'd "book" the dates they wanted. Enough friends of same thought would probably be glad to be "engaged" for the occasion.

Closed for "cleaning" is good. Wearing theatrical make-up with false, suppurating zits might turn them off during a meeting.

Heterosexual folks need to be Creative..

Oh, there ARE ways around the travesty.
33 posted on 07/06/2005 11:51:14 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Illegals should be found and Deported; NOT welcomed and Supported!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
"Should we grant nudist these same rights? Think about it."

Okay, I'm thinking.

No, saw a brochure advertising a nudist vacation spot, not worth it.
34 posted on 07/06/2005 12:40:11 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

You are right. This keeps making the rounds here and is, to say the least, highly dubious. Where in the heck did these "goals" come from? An official Communist party document? If so, Where can a copy be obtained?


35 posted on 07/06/2005 12:44:45 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Yes, there's an interview with Bill where he mentions his relationship with Mixner, which I don't have handy at the moment but I have a note on it; and there's also this from Hillary's book as summarized here:

AIM Report: Hillary Clinton's Biggest Cover-Ups

In her book, however, Hillary does write about some of her radical associates. She notes a meeting in 1969 with David Mixner of the Vietnam Moratorium Committee, an anti-Vietnam war protest group that came under investigation by the House Internal Security Subcommittee for its involvement with communists and backing from Hanoi. Mixner would go on to become a leading homosexual activist, adviser to and friend of President Clinton. He was credited with delivering some six million votes to Clinton in 1992.

Speaking of which, Edward Klein's new book on Hillary has some related stuff:

Richard Poe, "The Woman Who Would Be President"

SNIP

A Wellesley classmate of Hillary’s recalls: "The notion of a woman being a lesbian was fascinating to Hillary. But she was much more interested in lesbianism as a political statement than a sexual practice… A lesbian… was a dynamic young woman who had thrown off the shackles of male dominance. Hillary talked about it a lot, read lesbian literature, and embraced it as a revolutionary concept."

Klein never states that Hillary slept with a woman — though he names several who are "rumored" to have shared her bed. Klein focuses instead on Hillary’s allegiance to the radical "gender feminism" which she imbibed at Wellesley and which — according to Klein — she never renounced.

SNIP

36 posted on 07/06/2005 12:45:27 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

I think those goal DID come from an original communist document. I used to know what it was, but mostly the list survived, but unfortunately, without the original source. I should go and dig, and see if I come up with the original source, if I do, I'll post it and keep it handy for future reference.


37 posted on 07/06/2005 12:49:19 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

You'll have better luck than me if you do. Everytime this appears (every few months or so), I ask for a source but nobody ever provides one other than to site the Cong. Record or Skousen. Those are secondary sources, however. What is the primary source? If this is a party document, where can it be obtained? Nobody seems to have any idea or paricularly care. Frankly, I don't think there is scuh a document. The wording sounds too much like Dr. Evil to be very believable!


38 posted on 07/06/2005 12:53:04 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Here is what I could determine by a quick research.

The goals are listed in a book: "THe Naked Communist" by W. Cleon Skousen, who was a senior FBI agent under J. Edgar Hoover, the police chief of Salt Lake City, Utah, and a full professor at Brigham Young University.

Florida Congressman A.S. Herlong Jr. entered this list into the Congressional Records in 1963.


http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

http://www.spongobongo.com/em/em9817.htm


I don't know where Skousen got his list, he may mention it in his book. Considering, that he was an FBI agent, maybe they got hold of some commie documents.

But I have read elsewhere, that the communists were working hard on destroying the capitalist countries, starting with the US, "from within". It was a major strategy for them, so it's quite possible they outlined those items.

It is also interesting that those goals first saw the light of day in 1958, before a lot of them have been accomplished, that now are totally accepted, so it's not as if someone looked around today and created the goals retroactively, to fit today's status.


39 posted on 07/06/2005 12:58:16 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

As I said in my previous post, those are secondary documents. I know of many great historians I respect but I would expect that each and every one of them back up any controversial claims or statements with primary documents. The Congressional Record, btw, is not a good source. Every wacko, including Maxine Waters, etc., can insert whatever they want in that. Again, this wording sounds like something out of Dr. Evil. Where does it come from?


40 posted on 07/06/2005 1:02:14 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson