Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEN. SCHUMER CAUGHT ON CELLPHONE: 'WE ARE GOING TO WAR' OVER SUPREME COURT
Drudge Report ^ | 7/6/2005 | Drudge

Posted on 07/06/2005 8:57:00 AM PDT by visagoth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last
To: ArmyBratproud
It's time for Frist to pull the trigger!

We should go beyond nuclear. We need to go use our antimatter option.

241 posted on 07/06/2005 4:36:40 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Leahy is on Hairball with Andrea Mitchell---

I have never EVER heard a interviewer serve up SO many softballs and lead a guest toward an answer like she did..

I thought Chrissy Matthews was bad, but Mitchell---better, she doesn't pull any punches...

If you want to REALLY get mad, watch the replay of this show tonight!!!

BTW, Sam Brownback is getting ready to come on---anxious to see how HIS questions are framed!


242 posted on 07/06/2005 4:38:07 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Uh, who was the last SC Republican to be denied primary renomination? Uh, rephrase that: has ANY SC Republican ever been denied renomination, save for a few state legislators?


243 posted on 07/06/2005 4:43:46 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

When Lindsay was on Hannity tonight, he seemed to say that asking nominees how they would rule in Roe v. Wade type case, would be off-limits...

AND, he said that since Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor, and Priscilla Owen are all pro-life, and they were confirmed, that can't be considered an "extraordinary circumstance"---

He also said that he would hold the democrats in the GANG of 14, to their word, that they wouldn't filibuster because of judicial philosophy...

I think we have to give Andrea Mitchell the title of Dems Head Cheerleader...she practically had out her pom-poms when Leahy was on...

BTW, according to Leahy, they are not going to be "bound" by the timetable the President made, of having a justice ready to start in October..

He said that the President doesn't have the "right" to tell the Senate what their timetable should be, then he said that IF this becomes ugly, and a long drawn out process, it will be Bush's fault...

for nominating a "divider, not a uniter"...therefore, the country must be told it is HE, not the dem Senators that is causing the problem.


244 posted on 07/06/2005 4:52:40 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I don't see Lindsey holding them to their word.

If he was on the line with Chucky boy...planning a possible event.....

then something bad is going down.


245 posted on 07/06/2005 5:01:59 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (McCain, you'll never be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Now that idiot that follows Hard Ball is on.

He'll attack Rove in 5,4,3,2.....


246 posted on 07/06/2005 5:03:26 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (McCain, you'll never be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

LOL---you got it..

Did you see the thread about the ratings of these shows?

It is totally amazing how much the ratings for Fox News, has overwhelmed CNN, which means that MSNBC is underground looking up!!! and Olbermann is the worst of the worst!


247 posted on 07/06/2005 5:08:02 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

is this a real photo? do you have a source for it?


248 posted on 07/06/2005 5:22:05 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: camle
perhaps someone can tell me how this conversation was overheard and what makes it different from Newt Gingrinch's "overheard" conversation that got two dem operatives arrest4ed for illegal wiretapping?

Apparently, it was heard by another passenger on the Amtrak train standing near Schumer. That's legal.

The other situation you referred was illegal because it intercepted an electronic signal in violation of the so-called "Electronic Communications Privacy Act" (ECPA).

249 posted on 07/06/2005 5:31:18 PM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
I watched it, and I like Fred Thompson, don't you?
250 posted on 07/06/2005 5:33:20 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
This week's TV Guide gave Olberman "Cheer" for being irreverent.

-PJ

251 posted on 07/06/2005 5:33:27 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

The point is, he's supposed to have the "advice and consent" of the Senate for any nominations.

Lets get one thing perfectly clear. The dems are using the filibuster to PREVENT A VOTE. Because THEY KNOW THE NOMINEES ARE QUALIFIED AND WOULD BE CONFIRMED.

So they are refusing to do THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY, which is to say yea or nay to a nomination.

If Bush was to make recess appointments, the shoe would be on the other foot. When Congress came back in session, the dims would have to PROVIDE SOME SORT OF EVIDENCE THE APPOINTED PERSON WAS INELIGIBLE.

Yeah, the whiners in Congress would scream bloody murder. But they would totally understand why it was done. And it might put any more nominations on the fasttrack for a vote.


252 posted on 07/06/2005 5:37:40 PM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Coop, for the life of me, I still can't figure out why you think that "deal" changed nothing especially if this story is true?

Please name one thing - just one - that has changed since that deal went through. (You know, other than the confirmation of six separate judges, including at least two "controversial" nominees.)

253 posted on 07/06/2005 5:37:50 PM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
The truth will be in his actions, not words.

Let's see what happens.

Then let's get back to each other.

254 posted on 07/06/2005 6:00:33 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

'Chuckie will "go to war" over a conservative Supreme Court nominee, but not over radical Islamist terrorist attack where thousands of innocent Americans are killed.'

worth repeating.


255 posted on 07/06/2005 6:13:19 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: visagoth
Hey Chucky, maybe you haven't heard (but everybody else has) that talking on a cell phone isn't secure!! You friggin moron!! You deserve to be hammered!


256 posted on 07/06/2005 6:15:36 PM PDT by unixfox (AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

slow down. the President and his advisors have plenty of info, and strategies that will make us say "oh, cool", when it happens.


257 posted on 07/06/2005 6:18:55 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
In that case, I give TV Guide a "bronx" CHEER, for being irrelevant!
258 posted on 07/06/2005 6:21:11 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Like this?

"Gay marriage is an issue that is being decided by the states. Why, Sen. Schumer, would you be interested in how a justice feels about this state law, or any other states' rights, unless you intend to overturn it through an activist Supreme Court?"


259 posted on 07/06/2005 6:28:21 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Please name one thing - just one - that has changed since that deal went through. (You know, other than the confirmation of six separate judges, including at least two "controversial" nominees.)

Bolton has been fillibustered to name one where he would NOT have been had the CO been initiated.

Coop, "The Deal" is the change. It took focus off the constitutional option... That's the whole ball of wax. The target is not the judgeships in the fed courts, that was the unknowing ploy that has worked so far for them dems, because the dems had NOTHING, before the deal. There is not ONE of those Judges appointed that will make a tinker's damn bit of difference in the next 2 years! It's using the CO that matters. It's appointing Bush's nominees to the SC that's important.

When the President nominates a SC judge and the dems bring up "EC" tell me, what you think is going to be the FIRST thing Frist will do?

He can't even begin to bring up the CO because the dumbass moderate idiot Repubs will be debating what EC means!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why is there all this talk of WAR? Not just Schmucker, but rambling all over the press.

260 posted on 07/06/2005 6:29:50 PM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson