Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I want to see a strict constitutionalist put up for the court (by definition, that will be a conservative). I do not want to see the president swayed by week-kneed RINOs or the hand-wringing MSMers or hysterical Democratic senators.

Show me what I came for. Show me what I paid for. Show me that you will deliver what you promised.

Because if you don't...if somewhere in the back rooms, part of the calculus is, Who else are they gonna vote for anyway? (other than whatever Republican is running), I'm going to vote for her to show you that I am tired of being taken for granted. Very, very tired.

How often here on FR we complain about how the Dems keep African-Americans on "the plantation"--taking them for granted, of course...BECAUSE WHO ELSE ARE THEY GOING TO VOTE FOR?

We felt a little superior, didn't we? But if the wrong nominee comes up, it only shows they were taking us for granted once again. Only this time, it's on one of the most important issues affecting our lives. (Yes, I take some hope that the national outcry over last week's land-grab ruling will inform the SC choice, but I fear that it will only be a small part of the decision.)

This is for me and my wife...and our kids...and our grandchildren. This nominee is the key to how the court will judge for a long, long time, likely.

And if this screaming, disingenuous, manipulative MINORITY can control the nominee when we (technically) have more power....

We might as well elect Hilary, because it won't make any difference. And she'll be such a horrible, leftist, socialistic, fascistic president...that maybe one day we'll finally catch some Republican politicians with some balls.

1 posted on 07/02/2005 7:53:51 PM PDT by John Robertson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: John Robertson

Yawn.

Is that you Arator?


62 posted on 07/02/2005 8:18:10 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Ketchup Boy is the George Costanza of the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
WooHoo!!! go ahead, BE A LIB SUPPORTER ! ..... YET another chance to Clear out the "Linguini Spine, Deadwood, Left-leaning Moderates" from the Ranks

SEE YA, WOULDN'T WANT TO BE YA ....

66 posted on 07/02/2005 8:20:40 PM PDT by austinmark (Torture? Koran abuse? ... I'd Rather Be A Koran In Gitmo THAN A Bible in Saudi Arabia !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
I have been thinking and worrying over this too, and its discouraging to think what could happen, and think of the fight that we have ahead of us, but I take comfort in knowing that at last we have a majority in this country. We voted him into office and we kept him there, despite all the leftist rhetoric and attacks.

And he has not let us down thus far. He stands by his promises. Don't let the leftists dishearten us. Take action! Write your congressmen. Write the president himself and let them know that you support them, so that they will have the courage to do what we voted them into office to do.

67 posted on 07/02/2005 8:20:49 PM PDT by Desert_Girl ("Let's ROLL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

Looks like the Free Republic likes Hillary too; they cancelled this Freep:

Freep Hillary Rotten Clinton in Englewood, NJ, Sunday, June 26, 2005, 10 AM
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1427774/posts


69 posted on 07/02/2005 8:21:42 PM PDT by Coleus (God doesn't like moderates, Rev 3:15-16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

Gotta say- I agree, except that I will go third party.

This two party system had better pay off. THIS VERY ISSUE, Supreme Court nominees, is solely and precisely why I supported Bush twice. If it doesn't pay off, I'm gone. I'll go to the right of the GOP and work from there.


72 posted on 07/02/2005 8:21:50 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Whats up my Freeper!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
Her husband was re-elected and she was running the show. Think back to those 8 years, which obviously, you enjoyed a very great deal and yearn to have back. Then, go join DU; you'll be happier over there.

Without even knowing who the president is even thinking about nominating, like a two year old, you're threatening to hold your breathe and turn blue, if you don't get exactly what you want, when you want it. JUST GROW UP !

73 posted on 07/02/2005 8:22:53 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

Voting for Hillary Clinton is supposed to help conservatism...uh, how?


74 posted on 07/02/2005 8:23:06 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
Now John... that took some really big hairy onions to post that.. especially here..

Execellent question(s).. Not everybody has a "you can go this far and no further" credo..
Some (RINOS) will bend to whatever position rather than make a decision..
I have played with a version of the concept(above) in my mind.. haven't made a hard decision yet.. Cudos.. This thread opens the conversation.. Have a feelin most here can't handle it.. Hopefully I'm wrong.. I don't like being played for a fool.. its starting to look like I've been very foolish, politically..

76 posted on 07/02/2005 8:23:30 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

I don't like to think where we would be with four more years of a Clinton presidency.


83 posted on 07/02/2005 8:25:23 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

I take it that you haven't been paying any attention to the Judges that he has sent up so far?


84 posted on 07/02/2005 8:25:30 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
I'm a die-hard Red Sox fan. If the Sox don't win it all again this year I'm going to completely abandon them and begin cheering for the Yankees!!

Psych!!
85 posted on 07/02/2005 8:26:05 PM PDT by incredulous joe ("If NOW gets involved in this, it is certain that things will get UGLY.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

Read "Atlas Shrugged". The premise of the story is to stop fighting the socialists and let them run the country into the ground and then come in and pick up the pieces.


86 posted on 07/02/2005 8:26:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

That doesn't make a lot of sense, but knock yourself out if you think voting for Hilly will, on balance, advance your cause.


87 posted on 07/02/2005 8:26:17 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

89 posted on 07/02/2005 8:26:28 PM PDT by mirkwood (The National Guard should protect our nation, right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
Voting for Hitlery is not such a bad idea when you think a bit about it.

If the Republicans still retain control of the Senate and House of Representatives, then they will be able to truly limit government spending.

Something a completely Republican legislature and executive has not been able to accomplish to date.

Still I'm planning on voting for the Constitution Party candidate. I live in California so making a statement makes more sense than adding one more vote to a losing Republican effort.

90 posted on 07/02/2005 8:26:29 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

Rather than vote for Hillary, I would like to encourage (and vote for, if possible) some honest-to-God conservatives in the democrat party. They would have to show NO party discipline to democrats, and vote the RIGHT way every time. It would put a little fear in the complacent RINOs, who have taken their 'conservative' credentials for granted too long. My vote will go to the best/most conservative, whatever party he/she is from.


98 posted on 07/02/2005 8:31:29 PM PDT by Tax Government (Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
Are you are seeking politicians with balls?
 
Nice to meet you Diogenes.
 

100 posted on 07/02/2005 8:32:40 PM PDT by Radix (I was looking for a Tag Line when I found this one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
If Bush Doesn't Nominate A True Conservative, I'm Voting For Hillary For President.

Is this your idea of an opus?

You are a fool if you're being serious and sober with this post. But on the bright side I'd hope the chains don't chafe too much for you to bear under your new collectivist ideas.

103 posted on 07/02/2005 8:35:50 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
I want to see a strict constitutionalist put up for the court

I fear that this our republic's last chance for this to happen. The whole "checks and balances" facade has failed. We now have an unassailable judicial oligarchy that is accountable to no one. Congress was intended to be the dominant branch of government, but they have failed in this responsibility and our now completely subservient to the new "upper house" of the supreme court. Only the executive branch can save us from this growing tyranny, and only this president make this hope a reality. I recruited hundreds of other volunteers for this President's reelection, and all of them sacrificed their time and resources based on this particular promise from the President. We all gave him this opportunity, and we all deserve for him to seize it. I am hopeful that the President will follow through based on my understanding of his personal integrity and his track record of other judicial nominees. I am also fearful, however, because of the politically unthinkable consequences if he fails.

107 posted on 07/02/2005 8:39:01 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson

So he has to sacrifice a "true" conservative that will never in a million years get confirmed to keep your vote?! What about the second nomineee? Is he allowed to EVER put forth somebody that can make it all the way through the process, or are we just shaving one seat off the Supreme Court to satisfy you?

Two things to keep in mind:
Politics is the art of compromise, there will ALWAYS be some compromise in these things
Most Supreme Court Justices don't stay as far to either side as they seemed before being nominated, something about the robes changes people


109 posted on 07/02/2005 8:39:45 PM PDT by discostu (The dude abides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson