Posted on 07/02/2005 5:28:30 PM PDT by Coleus
Treasonous agenda of the Trilateral Commission "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values." – Zbigniew Brzeninski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and President Bush as co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisery Task Force; executive director of the Trilateral Commission My column last week focused on the Council on Foreign Relations and their anti-American agenda. This treasonous operation is another one of the tentacles birthed by the elitists out to destroy our constitutional republic, turn us into a democracy (America is not a democracy!) and eventually merge all nations into a "one world government." This is real – it is not a conspiracy theory, it is a heinous agenda that is all but complete except for the passage of CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement), FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) and nullification of the Second Amendment. If Bush gets his way and CAFTA and FTAA are ratified, you will see another gigantic sucking sound of millions more American jobs going south of the Hemisphere. So far, Utah appears to be the only state to recognize the danger of this destructive treaty (FTAA). Few Americans really understood back in 1993 what would happen under GATT because few ever heard of it – too many simply bought the propaganda from politicians and the rest were more interested in sports, porn, drugs, booze or fun times. Guess how many members of the entire Congress read GATT? One – former Sen. Hank Brown. He's the only senator who read this 28,000 page treaty and stated emphatically that no way would he vote for it. Yet, the rest of the Senate ratified this insidious treaty without ever reading it. Sadly, the American people continue electing these same sellouts back into office. During the hearings on this monster, French financier, the late Sir James Goldsmith, testified in front of Ernest Hollings committee. He demonstrated that GATT would gut the American textile market. The following are some quotes from the Washington Times, Dec. 6, 1993, which accurately reflect Sir Goldsmith's statements during the hearings: Global free trade will force the poor of the rich countries to subsidize the rich in poor countries. What GATT means is that our national wealth, accumulated over centuries, will be transferred from a developed country like Britain to developing countries like Communist China, now building its first oceangoing navy in 500 years. China, with its 1.2 billion people, three Indochinese states with 900 million, the former Soviet republics with some 300 million, and many more can supply skilled labor for a fraction of Western costs. Five dollars in Communist China is the equivalent of a $100 wage in Europe. It is quite amazing that GATT is sowing the seeds for global social upheaval and that it is not even the subject of debate in America ... If the masses understood the truth about GATT, there would be blood in the streets of many capitals. A healthy national economy has to produce a large part of its own needs. It cannot simply import what it needs and use its labor force to provide services for other countries. We have to rethink from top to bottom why we have elevated global free trade to the status of sacred cow, or moral dogma. It is a fatally flawed concept that will impoverish and destabilize the industrialized world while cruelly ravaging the Third World. On June 9, 2005, the House voted 338-86 to reject a motion to withdraw congressional approval of the 1994 agreement establishing the Geneva-based trading body (GATT-WTO). Every Congress-critter who voted to stay in this anti-American, new world order operation must be thrown out of office in November 2006 for continuing to abrogate our sovereignty to foreign countries The Trilateral Commission is another little known entity that is diligently and methodically working to destroy the sovereignty of this nation and put the United States under foreign rule – it is the twin monster of the CFR. Barry Goldwater was one of the lone voices decades ago trying to warn the American people about this operation. He said of the Trilateral Commission: The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. A list of past and present members of the Trilateral Commission can be viewed here. It is imperative to look at the companies and institutions these individuals belong to and then one can begin to connect the dots as to why Congress refuses to abolish the unconstitutional, privately owned Federal Reserve, immediately withdraw from the United Nations and the continuing passage of these devastating trade treaties. Our Republic is perilously close to being destroyed. This isn't about Republican vs. Democrat or any of these other distractions – it's an American issue. Without question, this factual information is very disturbing to Americans, however, this is about remaining a free and sovereign nation and not falling to communist domination under a world government. William Wallace was depicted saying in the movie, "Braveheart": "What will you do without freedom?" I ask you the same. 
It is soooooo easy for you nuts, all you have to do is accuse any rationally minded person of being part of the conspiracy, then you can move on. No conspiracy is too nutty, in fact, in your world, the conspiracy is that folks who disagree are part of a conspiracy!!! You have no logic, no proof, just BS. The problem with the conspiracy folk is that they make an outrageous claim, then ask others to prove them wrong. Sorry, you make a stupid ass claim, and its your responsibility to prove it, not mine to disprove it. I'm pointing and laughing, I've dealt with the nuttiest of the nuts, you are a rookie.
Hey, you still believe we didn't go to the moon Danny?
My remarks have to do with the Alinski method, not the veracity of some unnamed persons in your mind that made remarks about Y2K.
Many are clueless, thinking will import war material from our enemies to produce in fictional factories, the ones that have been relocated to our enemy years before.You've got that right!
SO many are 'clueless' when it comes to our defense contracting industry.
For instance, the former TI/DSEG plant that was sold to Raytheon is still up in McKinney; it and it's work haven't yet been shipped off to our enemies!
We really need the names of those defense contractors that has been shipped off to our enemies - any idea where we can start?
Let's look at the track record of those "misfits" at the FBI on Y2K,and their prognostication of doom and gloom, since you brought up the subject:
FBI Warns '2000' May Spark Violence
By David A. Vise and Lorraine Adams
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, October 31, 1999; Page A1
The FBI is warning police chiefs across the country that it has discovered evidence of religious extremists, racists, cults and other groups preparing for violence as New Year's Eve approaches and is urging law enforcement agencies to view the dawn of the next millennium as a catalyst for criminal activities.
The FBI says those most likely to perpetrate violence are motivated either by religious beliefs relating to the Apocalypse, or are New World Order conspiracists convinced the United Nations has a secret plan to conquer the world.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/oct99/fbi31.htm
not the veracity of some unnamed persons in your mind that made remarks about Y2K.'Remarks' about Y2K?
You mean the dire predictions or martial law, the takeover of industry, the posting of pictures and locations of purported "Y2K Internment Camps" where citizens were to be relocated?
There were more than 'remarks'; people were ordering a portion of their very LIVES around the impending doom and martial law that was being foretold ...
Ans, all this was supposedly driven by the NWO types giving instruction to Bill Xlintoon don't you know ...
Are those memories coming back yet?
Next thing you'll be spouting off about the Military Industrial Complex...
...is that why the BIG contractors aren't going anywhere?
Let's look at the track record of those "misfits" at the FBISorry, you're off getting off topic now.
G'nite.
Nope, I am unfamiliar with those remarks and I have no idea who made them.
I saw David Ickes one time; was not impressed. He IS a reptile if I ever saw one. He was knocking the US military. He's an arrogant little runt.
..is that why the BIG contractors aren't going anywhere?Well, that sorta works to prove my point.
I don't need to go any further!
OK, Mr. Conspiracy guy.
I am about to throw the two words at a conspiracy theorist that they can't handle.
Prove it
Hey, a conspiracy theorist changed the subject!
How typical.
When they have nothing they just spin......
Oh and how those contractors cried over having to comply to buy American.
Prove what?
Maybe next time we'll get a higher caliber of conspiracy theorist; this crop is sorely lacking. At least the michael redvero's* of the world could put up a good fight.
(* Purposely mispelled)
Oh dear, what conspiracy? Did I say the Trilateral commission was a conspiracy? Or was I putting up provable information about the Alinski Method? Its clear that this method is being used on this thread. I was just pointing it out.
You throw out conspiracies, but with no proof, just a bunch of crap from folk that devote their lives to uncovering the conspiracies that devil them so.
I'm going to bed, come up with a bunch of conspiracies, and prove them, then leak them to the press (unless of course the press is part of "the conspiracy!".
pointing and laughing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.