[Central Scrutiniser]

You throw out conspiracies, but with no proof, just a bunch of crap from folk that devote their lives to uncovering the conspiracies that devil them so.

I'm going to bed, come up with a bunch of conspiracies, and prove them, then leak them to the press (unless of course the press is part of "the conspiracy!".

pointing and laughing

[endthematrix]

Prove what conspiracy?

[William Terrell]

So you believe that conspiracies exist? This is intelligent, because most of the darker political changes in nations of the world in the past have been the result of conspiracies. You just don't believe the Trilateral Commission is engaged in one?

You throw out conspiracies, but with no proof, just a bunch of crap from folk that devote their lives to uncovering the conspiracies that devil them so.

Of any political conspiracy in the past, which one could any outsider "prove" to exist before it gained enough power to drop the mask, when, in fact, the modus operandi of a conspiracy is by definition to stay secret?

I'd rather be on the "conspiracy theory" side, and watchful. If there is none, we've just been watchful for nothing, but if there is, we're ready. On the other hand, if we write it off as nuts, the only way we prevail is if, and only if, it is nuts. What if it's not?

I'd rather be wrong my way than yours.