Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2005 1:05:55 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Pikamax
It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.
2 posted on 07/02/2005 1:07:41 PM PDT by woofie (An invisible man marries an invisible woman. The kids were nothing to look at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

hmmmmm -- well it looks like Rove is involved somehow. There will be many twists to this story.


3 posted on 07/02/2005 1:08:58 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

What garbage. It has already been well established on other threads that Rove did nothing wrong. Charaacter assasination, pure and simple. I hope the White House doesn't knuckle under and fights this tooth and nail. And what about those two lawyers leaking information about their clients? They should be investigated and disbarred.


5 posted on 07/02/2005 1:09:58 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Well, this is the most detail so far, but there's nothing there that says "Rove was the source of the leak".

Not that it can be called a leak, really, but you know.


6 posted on 07/02/2005 1:11:39 PM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove had been interviewed by Cooper for the article. It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.

Jeez, the liberal media will clutch at ANYTHING that they can try to pin on Karl Rove.

You can bet every dollar you have that if Karl Rove was the source, Cooper, Miller, and every liberal media entity would be screaming it from the rooftops.

The REAL leaker is a Dem, you can guarantee it. Patrick Leaky?

7 posted on 07/02/2005 1:11:40 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

My understanding is that Plame was once a covert agent but since her marriage became an above the board agent with a staff job. It's not criminal to speak of a "known" CIA employee.


8 posted on 07/02/2005 1:12:38 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. Rove has waived any confidentiality and said that reporters can reveal anything that was said between himself and them. It's not exactly an 'aha' moment when the reporters turn over their notes, at least as regards Rove, since he's said they could for a while now.


12 posted on 07/02/2005 1:13:44 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

This is the so-called "IT'S ROVE" scoop by Newsweek O'Donnell was talking about?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! This article practically absolves him.

Someone should post this at the DUmp.


14 posted on 07/02/2005 1:15:50 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
In my opinion, it was Mr.Plame who leaked his wife's identity. He was way too eager to repeat the news for the camera, and actually flaunted it. He even had special thanks to his wife, "an agent of the CIA", already printed in the book he was getting ready to release.

There are two very liberal writers willing to go to jail to protect someone - and I doubt they're doing it to protect Karl Rove!

17 posted on 07/02/2005 1:17:11 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Relax. Rove always admitted to providing information to reporters AFTER the Novak story. There is nothing knew here, except "reporters" like Iskoff (who is guilty of publishing false stories before to attempt to make a name for himself) trying to make something out of nothing. I like the way Iskoff quotes unnamed lawyers who are sympathtic to the White House, however, they have no probably spreading rumors. This will be another Rove conspiracy story that backfires on the libs.


18 posted on 07/02/2005 1:18:15 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
The leak to Novak, apparently intended to discredit Wilson's mission, caused a furor when it turned out that Plame was an undercover agent. It is a crime to knowingly reveal the identity of an undercover CIA official.Was an undercover agent, or had been. I think it's pretty clear, under the terms of the applicable law, that no crime was ever committed. This account says Rove talked to Cooper after the appearance of Novak's story when everybody knew who and what Plame was (and many may have know it before). Then Isikoff goes on to say that Rove had talked to Cooper before the Novak article appeared. What he does NOT say is if it was in the earlier interview that Rove made a remark about Plame and it does not appear that it was. And if it was, then why did Novak break the story and not Cooper?
21 posted on 07/02/2005 1:19:34 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"The Rove Factor?"

Shouldn't it be "The O'Rove Factor"?
Complete with "Talking Points" amd "Most Ridiculous Item of the Day" segments?

Name and town, name and town, name and town...!


30 posted on 07/02/2005 1:25:54 PM PDT by Checkers (Gitmo has killed fewer people than Michael Schiavo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Folks I do not like the sound of this. If Rove is somehow en voled, this can only be bad news for Bush. None of this makes any sense. Hopefully it will be sorted out quickly and no one at the White House is implicated.
31 posted on 07/02/2005 1:25:55 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Didn't we already know that Rove had been interviewed?


33 posted on 07/02/2005 1:26:37 PM PDT by GOP_Proud (...stumbling across Bill Bennett on the radio is like bumping into Socrates at Starbucks.-K.Parker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Rove is not stupid. He did not do anything wrong.

Meanwhile, I wonder how the idiots at DU are reacting. They are probably salivating over the prospect that Evil Genius Rove is going to be slammed! When it doesn't happen, they will interpret that as evidence of the Vast Right Wing conspiracy at work!


38 posted on 07/02/2005 1:29:34 PM PDT by laishly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Since the Watergate slime-balls took down a sitting president the media swine, and government socialist, with an agenda are seeking the money, and notoriety, that could come with a encore.

Sick to imagine the destructive bent of the fifth column.
45 posted on 07/02/2005 1:33:10 PM PDT by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

O'Donnell off his meds again.


47 posted on 07/02/2005 1:38:14 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Isikoff has the credibility of a cashier caught stealing from the till, but allowed to keep his job.
O'Donnell lost his credibility when he lost "it" in front of America.


64 posted on 07/02/2005 2:39:56 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
one of Cooper's sources was White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to two lawyers who asked not to be identified

As predicted, more falsehoods from Newsweek "anonymous sources". The Time Magazine notes and e-mails are sealed grand jury evidence. No one will be charged (except Cooper and Miller for contempt) because no crime has been committed. So the real content of the notes and e-mails will never be revealed. That means that "creepy liars" in the MSM can accuse Karl Rove all day long. They're such a bunch of low-life pinheads.
66 posted on 07/02/2005 2:52:52 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Quick - we need Sandy Berger to retrive those nasty eMails.


69 posted on 07/02/2005 3:10:04 PM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson