Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor retiring!
Fox News | 7/1/05 | SueRae

Posted on 07/01/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by SueRae

Hearing on Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 1down6togo; filibustertime; herewego; oconnor; retirement; sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
To: txrangerette

BRAVO!


721 posted on 07/01/2005 9:07:33 AM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
A president was impeached in 73 and resigned.

Incorrect. Not 1973, and Nixon was not impeached.

The House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment in July of 1974, but Nixon resigned in August of 1974 before the full House could vote on them.

722 posted on 07/01/2005 9:07:33 AM PDT by Steve0113 (Stay to the far right to get by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

IOW, hopefully Stevens decides to quit now that O'Connor has.


723 posted on 07/01/2005 9:07:47 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You don't like Bush, you never have, and there is literally NOTHING he can do that will EVER satisfy you because

Because I saw right through his phony "compassionate" conservatism.
When he appoints another Souter, I'll be able to say "I told you so", won't I???

724 posted on 07/01/2005 9:07:48 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
It's Janice Rogers Brown time.

The Dems allowed her confirmation a few weeks ago, so they'll have a difficult time invoking "special circumstances" this time around.

Hopefully the Prez has the guts to do it.

725 posted on 07/01/2005 9:08:49 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
If we are calm, I think we will end up being pleasantly surprised.

And hence, your screen name!! LOL Call me Pollyanna too, because I truly believe the same thing! I thing he has been prepared for this for some time.

726 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:00 AM PDT by Sea2ShiningSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
"A bunch of libs on a board I visit are saying that they "fear for (their) children" now that O'Connor is leaving."
I fear your children?


ROTGL! And very accurate, sadly.
727 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:21 AM PDT by halieus (The very idea of freedom presupposes some objective moral law which overarches rulers & ruled alike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: madison10
What makes you think it will be THEM having the insanity issues? LOL I'm gonna flip out just listening to the daily news nonsense.

The DUmmies are beating you to it - insane that is...

DU losers LoL!

728 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:23 AM PDT by demlosers (Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

Not me. Its like I'm in the belly of the beast. While in the nice red areas you may find 6 outta 10 folks like you, here in the belly its like 3 in 10. Still, I don't encourage giving into fear and fleeing.


729 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:25 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Heard it in the car. Let's hope Bush nominates a real conservative and somehow he or she can get by the senate.


730 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:34 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

You want an originalist. So do I.


731 posted on 07/01/2005 9:09:38 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

I can't reveal any of that information, since I have to protect someone's confidentiality in this case.


732 posted on 07/01/2005 9:10:20 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: GoldwaterChick; You Dirty Rats

I'd think Edith Jones would have a better shot. She's been on the 5th Circuit for nearly two decades, so she's obviously got the pedigree. And she's at least as conservative as Brown.


733 posted on 07/01/2005 9:10:27 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Always fight the good fight!


734 posted on 07/01/2005 9:10:41 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Soul Seeker wrote: ""Bashing people necessary to the party for having different priorities is RIDICULOUS as in this instance we're all onboard for the same outcome.""

Bravo~!!! Applause!!



735 posted on 07/01/2005 9:11:14 AM PDT by Pepper777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Ted Olsen, first.

I do too but those in the know say he is too old. They want someone in their fifties so the candidate can be on the court for 30 years.

736 posted on 07/01/2005 9:11:14 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I'm trying to remember the last time you were right about anything, Willie.

I'll have to get back to you.


737 posted on 07/01/2005 9:11:16 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
At the time of Bork's nomination there were many Republican senators who were adamantly opposed to having Bork on the court -- mainly because his role in the Watergate affair indicated a lack of principle, an excess of political ambition, or both.

Such a bad rap. Bork was told by the AG (Elliot Richardson)and Deputy AG (William Ruckleshouse) to assume acting AG, not because of ambition, but because Bork was the final political appointee in the Justice Department's chain of succession. Had Bork joined the AG and Dep. AG, the next in line would have been a civil servant, and likely would have created what Richardson and Ruckleshouse dubbed a "constitutional crisis." Source: private conversation with Richardson and Ruckleshouse.

738 posted on 07/01/2005 9:11:23 AM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The sad thing is that even though O'Connor quitting gives us a reliable conservative vote, we still are one vote away from a true majority.

Instead, we have Kennedy in there mucking things up, and for all intents and purposes, he will be a liberal when it counts.

We would still lose all the vital decisions.


739 posted on 07/01/2005 9:12:13 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

Well said Hobbes.


740 posted on 07/01/2005 9:12:14 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,281-1,297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson