Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican contender says Clinton not serving state well - (Ed Cox says might take her on!)
CNN.COM ^ | JUNE 29, 2005 | Phil Hirschkorn and Shirley Zilberstein

Posted on 06/30/2005 10:47:57 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Cox spoke in Manhattan Wednesday in his first appearance before reporters since forming an exploratory committee for the 2006 U.S. Senate race.

Cox, 58, a lawyer who has never run for office, criticized the Democratic incumbent for supposedly eyeing the White House in 2008. "I believe that a senator should focus less on making headlines and more on producing results," Cox said.


"She parachuted into New York solely for the reason of running for the Senate, and now she's running for the presidency. She is more concerned about the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire than the priorities of people in New York," he said

Cox also said New York is disadvantaged because both of its senators, Clinton and Charles Schumer, are Democrats.

"I never thought I'd see the date when our clout in Washington would be so diminished as it is now," Cox said. "She [Clinton] has not been able to produce because she's not in the party in power in Washington."

Cox said he will travel across the state this summer to "engage New Yorkers in a dialogue" before making a commitment to the race.

"To be sure this will not be a listening tour. I am a New Yorker," Cox said, in a jibe to Mrs. Clinton's summer of 1999 travels across the state when she was still first lady. "In the coming months, I look forward to showing New Yorkers that they can be better served."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2006; campaign; edcox; lawyer; newyork; nixon; republican; senate; soninlaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: montag813
Yes, some little known Westchester County District Attorney is the "only" candidate who can beat Hillary. Sure.

Perhaps you can locate any polls showing Pirro at least breaking even with Hillary while Cox and Spencer would lose in a landslide.

Again, UNLESS Rudy runs, ANY candidate we run against Hillary is GOING to have an incredibly tough uphill battle. There is no excuse for running a pro-abort RINO by saying she's magically "electable". Saying it 1000 times will not increase her long shot odds.

21 posted on 07/01/2005 4:29:47 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Find out about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "best friend" in the GOP... www.NoLaHood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

wooouldn't that be ironic if he beat her!


22 posted on 07/01/2005 4:31:06 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to steal your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Pirro/Pataki would be the only persons to make a race of it. Rudy would beat her. All these others - she wins re-election in a landslide.


23 posted on 07/01/2005 4:32:16 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"She parachuted into New York solely for the reason of running for the presidency.

Good catch! Hell, Cox may as well take a stab at running.

24 posted on 07/01/2005 4:37:02 PM PDT by demkicker (A skunk sat on a stump; the stump thunk the skunk stunk; the skunk thunk the stump stunk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I wonder if Mr. Cox can count on any support from other former Nader's Raiders.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

25 posted on 07/01/2005 4:39:17 PM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Yes, some little known Westchester County District Attorney is the "only" candidate who can beat Hillary. Sure.

Where did I say she could beat Hillary. I don't believe anyone but Rudy could beat her, and even that would be a battle royale. Cox and Spencer are ridiculous losers-to-be. Anyone who gives a dime to them is an idiot, unless they use $100 bills to light cigars.

26 posted on 07/01/2005 8:37:46 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson