Skip to comments.
CAFTA's Threats to U.S. Independence
STOPFTAA ^
Posted on 06/30/2005 8:22:09 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
CAFTAs Threats to U.S. Independence
(with supporting quotes directly from the CAFTA agreement as publicly available on ustr.gov)
STOPCAFTA.com
June 29, 2005
- CAFTAs role as steppingstone to hemispheric integration and the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). [The governments of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the United States of America] resolved to:
CONTRIBUTE to hemispheric integration and provide an impetus toward establishing the Free Trade Area of the Americas. (CAFTA Agreement, Preamble)
- CAFTAs subservience to the World Trade Organization (WTO). [The governments of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the United States of America] resolved to:
BUILD on their respective rights and obligations under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
. The Parties to this Agreement, consistent with Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 [WTO] and Article V of the General Agreement on Trade in Services [WTO], hereby establish a free trade area
. The Parties affirm their existing rights and obligations with respect to each other under the WTO Agreement
. (CAFTA Agreement, Preamble and Chapter 1)
- Loss of U.S. independence to the supranational CAFTA Free Trade Commission. The Parties hereby establish the Free Trade Commission, comprising cabinet-level representatives of the Parties
. The Commission shall: (a) supervise the implementation of this Agreement; (b) oversee the further elaboration of this Agreement; (c) seek to resolve disputes that may arise regarding the interpretation or application of this Agreement; (d) supervise the work of all committees and working groups established under this Agreement; and (e) consider any other matter that may affect the operation of this Agreement. (CAFTA Agreement, Chapter 19)
- Loss of U.S. independence to World Bank and United Nations tribunals under CAFTA. Provided that six months have elapsed since the events giving rise to the claim, a claimant may submit a claim
(a) under the ICSID Convention [World Banks International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)] and the ICSID Rules of Procedures for Arbitration Proceedings, provided that both the respondent and the Party of the claimant are parties to the ICSID Convention; (b) under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, provided that either the respondent or the Party of the claimant is a party to the ICSID Convention; or (c) under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [United Nations Commission on International Trade Law arbitration rules]. (CAFTA Agreement, Chapter 10) A Party shall be deemed to be in compliance
if it is a party to and is in compliance with the 1958 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
. (CAFTA Agreement, Chapter 20)
- Loss of independence of U.S. federal, state, and local governments to regulate service professions and businesses to CAFTAs Cross-Border Trade in Services provisions. Cross-Border Trade in Services
applies to measures adopted or maintained by a Party affecting cross-border trade in services by service suppliers of another Party. Such measures include measures affecting: (a) the production, distribution, marketing, sale, and delivery of a service; (b) the purchase or use of, or payment for, a service; (c) the access to and use of distribution, transport, or telecommunications networks and services in connection with the supply of a service; (d) the presence in its territory of a service supplier of another Party; and (e) the provision of a bond or other form of financial security as a condition for the supply of a service
. For purposes of this Chapter, measures adopted or maintained by a Party means measures adopted or maintained by: (a) central, regional, or local governments and authorities; and (b) non governmental bodies in the exercise of powers delegated by central, regional, or local governments or authorities
. National Treatment 1. Each Party shall accord to service suppliers of another Party treatment no less favorable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to its own service suppliers. 2. The treatment to be accorded by a Party under paragraph 1 means, with respect to a regional level of government, treatment no less favorable than the most favorable treatment accorded, in like circumstances, by that regional level of government to service suppliers of the Party of which it forms a part
. Most-Favored-Nation Treatment Each Party shall accord to service suppliers of another Party treatment no less favorable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to service suppliers of any other Party or a non-Party
. Local Presence No Party may require a service supplier of another Party to establish or maintain a representative office or any form of enterprise, or to be resident, in its territory as a condition for the cross-border supply of a service. (CAFTA Agreement, Chapter 11)
TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: cafta; nafta; undergroundeconomy
CAFTA and NAFTA are our friends.
1
posted on
06/30/2005 8:22:09 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
To: Happy2BMe
Congressman Ron Paul says the CAFTA treaty has 2,400 pages.
This is not about free trade, it is a precursor to political integration.
2
posted on
06/30/2005 8:24:22 AM PDT
by
OK
To: Happy2BMe
CAFTA is garbage.
....which of course means that President Bush must love it, and that Congress is definitely going to pass it.
To: JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; dagnabbit; Pro-Bush; ...
Just in time to solve ALL our economic problems - CAFTA
4
posted on
06/30/2005 8:28:11 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
To: OK
This is not about free trade, it is a precursor to political integration.
------
*** YOU NAILED IT !!! ***
And now ask "why do our borders with Mexico remain open??" to the detrement of our soverignty, our laws, our citizen rights??? And sadly it is being carried out by Washington elitists, and NOT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
5
posted on
06/30/2005 8:45:05 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA; OK; SunnyD1182
6
posted on
06/30/2005 8:53:00 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
To: Happy2BMe
7
posted on
06/30/2005 8:58:12 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/scotuspropertythieving.htm)
To: traviskicks
One element of your plan is missing:
Main Entry: rec·i·proc·i·ty
Pronunciation: "re-s&-'prä-s(&-)tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 : the quality or state of being reciprocal : mutual dependence, action, or influence
2 : a mutual exchange of privileges; specifically : a recognition by one of two countries or institutions of the validity of licenses or privileges granted by the other
8
posted on
06/30/2005 9:13:07 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
To: Happy2BMe
Loss of Independence Day..
Coming Soon?
9
posted on
06/30/2005 9:13:54 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
To: Happy2BMe
CAFTA and NAFTA are our friends.And here are some of the enemies of CAFTA:
CISPES
Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists - Social Justice Committee
UCLA La Raza Graduate Student Association
Denver Justice and Peace Committee
Idaho Green Party
International Project Solidarity
Coalition for Alternatives to War
Coalition Against Global Exploitation
SEPA
Freedom Socialist Party
Progressive Democrats of America
Public Citizen
Social Welfare Action Alliance
More radical leftist groups against CAFTA
Looks like the one-worlder, more power to the U.N., types are aligned against CAFTA too. Nice company.
10
posted on
06/30/2005 9:21:09 AM PDT
by
Mase
To: NormsRevenge
It's looking more and more like there will be a new Independence Day declared when the
"New North America" formally joining Canada, The United States, and Mexico as one nation.
(A new constitution will accompany that declaration. Who do you think will benefit the most from it?)
To: EagleUSA
"*** YOU NAILED IT !!! ***
And now ask "why do our borders with Mexico remain open??" to the detrement of our soverignty, our laws, our citizen rights??? And sadly it is being carried out by Washington elitists, and NOT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!"
----
Yep, and judging by the number of posts on this thread, NOBODY cares.
To: Happy2BMe
Just a little reminder........
The Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in the Persuance thereof; and all Treaties made, and which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. (US Constitution: Article VI, paragraph 2)
We need to be repealing treaties, not signing them.
13
posted on
06/30/2005 11:37:34 AM PDT
by
Bogolyubski
(Republican Battle Cry: "Run away! Run away!")
To: Mase
well, even a broke clock is right twice a day.
To: Happy2BMe
Thanks for this post. We need to kill this thing.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson