Skip to comments.
Developer Begins Process to Seize Justice Souter's Homestead
The Autonomist ^
| Wednesday, June 29, 2005
| Rocco DiPippo
Posted on 06/29/2005 7:52:11 PM PDT by DaveTesla
Last week, I reported on the Supreme Court's Kelo vs City of New London decision, which seriously weakened Constitutionally guaranteed private property rights.
Now, in what can only be viewed as an attempt at pure poetic justice, a budding developer, businessman Logan Darrow Clements, has begun the process of seizing Supreme Court Justice David Souter's homestead in Weare, New Hampshire and replacing it with a hotel.
Citing the Kelo decision, Clements has contacted Weare's building official, saying:
"Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, "Kelo vs. City of New London" clears the way for this land to be taken by the Government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."
Think the Fab Five ever considered that the Kelo ruling might directly threaten their property rights?
As I've said before, when our Constitution is ignored, all Americans suffer the consequences.
Clements is currently seeking investors to fund the project. He can be reached by clicking here. Encourage him to develop similar plans for properties owned by Supreme Court Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy and Stevens.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: announcements; assetforfeiture; awholelottakeywords; collectivistjudges; confiscation; connecticut; crowpie; davidsouter; elitistpig; eminentdomain; fascisminaction; foxnews; goodforthegander; hannityandcolmes; justdesserts; kelo; kelodecision; kelovsnewlondon; liberaljudges; liberalstruecolors; lostlibertyhotel; newlondon; privateproperty; propertyrights; propertyseizure; scotus; souter; tyranny; whatsgoodforthegoose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-149 next last
To: DaveTesla
"Am I taking this seriously? But of course," Meany told the Associated Press. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin."I'm so glad to read this. I kind of figured that Souter was picked for a reason (a freedom-friendly city government).
The Founders would be proud of this response. Our ridiculous elected officials stand idly by watching this fiasco (when they should have immediately begun impeachment proceedings against all five of the idiots); so the people take matters into their own hands.
Do you think they'll get the message? I doubt it.
To: garandgal
Yeah...
Where are the voices of outrage from our Congress and Senate leaders???
Anybody???
82
posted on
06/29/2005 11:50:57 PM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: MAK1179
Thank you for your post 23!!!
83
posted on
06/29/2005 11:51:51 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
84
posted on
06/29/2005 11:55:15 PM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: Bear_Slayer
We should buy shares so that we can get returns.
85
posted on
06/29/2005 11:59:50 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(A new day is Coming!)
To: DaveTesla
86
posted on
06/30/2005 12:05:24 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: knighthawk
See if my vacation opportunity linked above is worth a freep effort...
87
posted on
06/30/2005 12:06:14 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
Just for the exposure, I'd start a new thread with it. Worst that could happen is it would get pulled. It's a hoot!
FGS
88
posted on
06/30/2005 12:18:08 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
It is very fun. I am surprised no one has posted it as a thread yet.
89
posted on
06/30/2005 12:19:33 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
Go for it! It's way past my bed time or I'd have a go at it. If you start a new thread, gimme a ping so I can catch up tomorrow.
FGS
90
posted on
06/30/2005 12:22:28 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: MarMema
91
posted on
06/30/2005 12:22:50 AM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: MarMema
BTW, I like your title. Perfect.
.
92
posted on
06/30/2005 12:23:27 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake; DaveTesla
I don't know where to put it, though. Bloggers?
93
posted on
06/30/2005 12:25:16 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: DaveTesla
I haven't decided on the time I want to go yet.
94
posted on
06/30/2005 12:26:38 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
95
posted on
06/30/2005 12:26:57 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: MarMema
It's not really a blog.
Put it under News Current Events
use the keyword "eminentdomain"
96
posted on
06/30/2005 12:28:45 AM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: MarMema
I emailed Logan Darrow Clements
logan@freestarmedia.com
And offered to supply the Diesel fuel for the dozer's.
Of course Caterpillar makes some huge bulldozers.
97
posted on
06/30/2005 12:32:03 AM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: DaveTesla
Who said judges can't be the source of great mirth??? Souter and his fellow travelers have inadvertantly created an abundance of guffaws with their lack of comprehension skills re our Constitution. Now I REALLY gotta hit the sack.
FGS
98
posted on
06/30/2005 12:34:19 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: DaveTesla
OK I gotta get an IV in the morning, after that I will see about posting it. Something that good will be just as good then.
99
posted on
06/30/2005 12:36:09 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
I have great name for the demolition company.
The Mugabe Construction Co. LLP
100
posted on
06/30/2005 12:40:06 AM PDT
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson