Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Connecticut] General Assembly kills GOP plan to limit eminent domain powers
Newsday ^ | 6/29/2005 | SUSAN HAIGH

Posted on 06/29/2005 8:42:01 AM PDT by oblomov

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Republican leaders in the state Senate have called for another special session to consider legislation limiting Connecticut's eminent domain laws following its defeat in the General Assembly on Tuesday.

The proposal, offered in response to last week's U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing New London to take homes for a private development project, was killed on a mostly 22-11 party-line vote in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The House of Representatives, which also is run by Democrats, defeated a similar proposal 82-50.

The plans were offered as amendments to legislation that details the two-year, $31.2 billion budget and other provisions.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; kelo; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: oblomov
The proposal...was killed on a mostly 22-11 party-line vote in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The House of Representatives, which also is run by Democrats, defeated a similar proposal 82-50.



"Everything is going according to our plan."

41 posted on 06/29/2005 9:31:35 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
I'm sick of hearing the same speech about "Iraqi freedom" over and over again.

The President keeps repeating it because so many people keep forgetting the reasons we are in the war.

42 posted on 06/29/2005 9:33:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

The brain dead voters up there getting what they voted for.


43 posted on 06/29/2005 9:35:14 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Dealing with liberals? Remember: when you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
If you follow the lead of the top dog of the republican party don't expect too much. It was GWB that lobbied the Texas legislators to have eminent domain laws changed in Texas, allowing private individuals and companies to essentially take private property. This move made it possible for the "Texas Rangers" to steal property in Arlington Texas for a new stadium and stick the bill to taxpayers. GWB made about $15mm on the deal.

His silence now makes sense.

He's thrilled.

Bush is an enemy of home ownership.

44 posted on 06/29/2005 9:37:22 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Condemn the homes of Democratic Senators by using Eminent Domain law and make public parks out of them.


45 posted on 06/29/2005 9:40:30 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline snapped the last time the MSM blew smoke up my ass. Now its gone forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Later


46 posted on 06/29/2005 9:43:27 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

We thank our lucky stars that we escaped from this Taxachusettes wannabe! Richest state in the union and totally filled with 'rats. But the GOP is the party of the Rich!
Maybe Margaret Sanger was right; this country is full of morons, at least Connecticut is!


47 posted on 06/29/2005 9:49:16 AM PDT by SouthCarolinaKit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys has just pulled the same thing in Arlington, TX. Displacing residents of 150 homes for the sake of building a new Stadium for the Cowboys.(To be located next to Bush Stadium) Only 23 home owners have settled with Jones...the rest will be taken by ED. Of course the stadium will generate "new" tax dollars. It's for the good of the people don't ya' know.


48 posted on 06/29/2005 9:53:16 AM PDT by politicalwit (USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
Excellent. A stick to beat them with in 2006 elections....

That's not a stick. It's a SEQUOIA :)

49 posted on 06/29/2005 9:54:29 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Proof that liberal democrats are socialists bent on almost total state ownership

Never forget some animals are more equal than others.

50 posted on 06/29/2005 9:54:31 AM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit

didn't know that. will look into it. thanks!


51 posted on 06/29/2005 10:15:12 AM PDT by Zeppelin (If we lose the war on terror... http://www.ebaumsworld.com/waronterrorism.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

It's curious that Leiberman and Dodd have both fell off the radar screen lately.


52 posted on 06/29/2005 10:17:41 AM PDT by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

This is going to be an awesome 2006 issue. Every candidate must be forced to take a stance on Kelo vs. New London.


53 posted on 06/29/2005 10:20:49 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
WorldNetDaily (About Bush and Property rights)

Not content with taxpayer subsidies, he and his fellow owners successfully used the power of government to take land from other private citizens – via eminent domain – so it could be used for their own private purposes. Sound familiar?

But it gets worse. Litigation over the ballpark deal revealed documents showing that, beginning in 1990, the Texas Rangers' management – which included Bush as a managing general partner – conspired to use the government's power of eminent domain to further its private business interests.

The Link

And now you know the rest of the story. Bush was for this ruling by the Supremes 100 percent.

54 posted on 06/29/2005 10:45:31 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican (Americans hire Americans. Traitors hire illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
"The GOP proposal would have prevented a municipality or government agency from taking owner-occupied residential property with four or fewer units for a private development project."

How many of these Democrats are developers on the side? Have an interest in developing? Are members of HBOA? They need to be investigated...People of CT you had better wake up.

55 posted on 06/29/2005 11:13:56 AM PDT by yoe (Friends don't let Friends read the New York Times...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
I would venture to say that as much as this decision of eminent domain has been circulated, that most of the people of the U.S. have not heard or don't care about it or know the ramifications of the decision. The reason I say this is because I have asked about a dozen people about what they think about it and they didn't even know it happened. Just as a test, ask a few friends.
56 posted on 06/29/2005 11:27:30 AM PDT by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

"I did not know the mayor of New London was black until I saw her on TV last night. One state rep. from NL, also black and a Demo of course, was all in favor of eminent domain. I have to wonder why these folks are so opposed to individual rights when it comes to property."

and pics I've seen of homeowners indicate they're white - gee I wonder. . .

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45034


57 posted on 06/29/2005 12:00:44 PM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
If you follow the lead of the top dog of the republican party don't expect too much. It was GWB that lobbied the Texas legislators to have eminent domain laws changed in Texas, allowing private individuals and companies to essentially take private property. This move made it possible for the "Texas Rangers" to steal property in Arlington Texas for a new stadium and stick the bill to taxpayers. GWB made about $15mm on the deal.

That's typical liberal hogwash.

The Texas Rangers have never owned the stadium in Arlington. It is owned by the city of Arlington and was approved by the voters.

The Texas Rangers rent the stadium from the city.

58 posted on 06/29/2005 12:09:36 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

You need to do better research.


59 posted on 06/29/2005 12:17:54 PM PDT by politicalwit (USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
From:

http://texas.rangers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/tex/ballpark/facts.jsp

Cost

The revised cost of the overall project is approximately 191 million dollars. The financing was derived from 135 million dollars in bonds issued by the Arlington Sports Facilities Development Authority with the remaining equity raised through the sale or lease of luxury boxes and seat options in the new ballpark, loans guaranteed by the Rangers, the concessions contract with Sportservice and city street funds.

Annual debt service for the municipal bonds is provided by public-private sharing. That is comprised of a 3.5 million dollar rental payment from the Rangers and a one-half cent City of Arlington sales tax. The sales tax was approved in an Arlington municipal election by a 65% majority on January 19, 1991, and expires once the debt is retired.

The Rangers have a lease with the City of Arlington, and the club maintains and operates the entire facility.

Now, how did President Bush make $15 million from the deal?

Or was that his profit on the sale of his share of the team?

60 posted on 06/29/2005 1:21:56 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson