To: JohnHuang2
I think the socialist attack on judicial nominees who would use Framer-intent in interpreting the Constitution might also explain their attack on our Second Amendment "right of the people to keep and bear Arms." Why? Because when they come to take our property, they don't want to risk buckshot in the backsides.In my neighborhood it will more likely be 50 caliber.
To: JohnHuang2
No surprise that Walter Williams understands the Constitution better than the felonious 5.
Which one of those 12 words is difficult to understand?
They aren't difficult to understand assuming that you aren't on a Socialist Jihad against America.
America's socialists want more control over our lives, property and pocketbooks. They cannot always get their way in the legislature; the courts are their only chance.
Says it all really.
3 posted on
06/29/2005 1:40:31 AM PDT by
SoIA-79
("The plans differ; the planners are all alike." – Bastiat)
To: JohnHuang2
This reminds me of Jezebel who had Naboth stoned to death in order for Ahab to get the vineyard he wanted. So in modern times at least eminent domain doesn't include the death penalty. Everything else is the same.
7 posted on
06/29/2005 2:25:02 AM PDT by
carumba
To: JohnHuang2
Socialist fiat
Hey it's a Fiat. I'm not sure if it's a Socialist Fiat however.
10 posted on
06/29/2005 2:52:36 AM PDT by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: JohnHuang2
Another, more subtle, taking of property is via environmental wacko motives. While they don't take the physical piece of paper called the deed, some nut rules the swamp rats must be saved and thus you cannot develop your own property and you're stuck with it.
12 posted on
06/29/2005 3:37:26 AM PDT by
libertylover
(Liberal: A blatant liar who likes to spend other people's money.)
To: JohnHuang2
I think the socialist attack on judicial nominees who would use Framer-intent in interpreting the Constitution might also explain their attack on our Second Amendment "right of the people to keep and bear Arms." Why? Because when they come to take our property, they don't want to risk buckshot in the backsides. Ah, someone who understands the purpose of the Second Amendment.
13 posted on
06/29/2005 3:44:15 AM PDT by
libertylover
(Liberal: A blatant liar who likes to spend other people's money.)
To: JohnHuang2
The five so-called justices understand the Marxist constitution perfectly and apply it literally, without penumbras.
14 posted on
06/29/2005 5:02:27 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Marxism has not only failed to promote human freedom, it has failed to produce food)
To: JohnHuang2
Sthouter is another living example of why fa**ots should not be allowed anywhere near the judiciary.
To: JohnHuang2
Just because the gov't gets more money to blow, doesn't mean the public necessarily benefits.
20 posted on
06/29/2005 11:52:10 AM PDT by
JZelle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson