Posted on 06/28/2005 11:04:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
A private developer has contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire asking that the property of the judge who voted in favor of a controversial decision allowing a city to take residents' homes for private development be seized to make room for a new hotel.
Yesterday, Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to Chip Meany, the code enforcement officer of the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.
Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."
The Kelo v. City of New London decision, handed down Thursday, allows the New London, Conn., government to seize the homes and businesses of residents to facilitate the building of an office complex that would provide economic benefits to the area and more tax revenue to the city. Though the practice of eminent domain is provided for in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, this case is significant because the seizure is for private development and not for "public use," such as a highway or bridge. The decision has been roundly criticized among property-rights activists and limited-government commentators.
According to a statement from Clement, the proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, "featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America." Instead of a Gideon's Bible in each room, guests will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged," the statement said.
Clements says the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site "being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans."
"This is not a prank" said Clements. "The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."
Clements says his plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise additional capital for the project.
While Clements currently makes a living in marketing and video production, he tells WND he has had involvement in real estate development and is fully committed to the project.
"We will build a hotel there if investors come forward, definitely," he said.
Clements is the CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, which is dedicated to fighting "the most deadly and destructive force on the planet: abusive governments," the website states.
The activist says he is aware of the apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using it to purposely oust an American from his property.
"I realize there is a contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the Kelo decision, Clements told WND. "Therefore, it's a case of retaliation, not initiation."
Clements says some people have already offered to put money into the project.
Related stories:
Property battle heads to states
High court's property decision stirs anger
Court rules cities can seize homes
LOL!
Could be!
I just checked the 2004 election results for Weare and they went 58% Bush, 41% Kerry, 1% Nader.
http://election.cbsnews.com/election2004/county/president_nh0.shtml
oh yeah baby!
Absolutely! The Supreme Court has spoken.
Where do I invest?
Is Logan Darrow Clements the same person who ran for governor of California?
What a great idea! I also think that other developers should seek the properties of Ginsburg...she is the big ACLU lawyer who spreads this communisim on the court.
All the justices who have voted to repeal the 5th amendment should have their properties taken away. Wise town counsels would follow through with this course of action as a way of fighting back at this tyranny.
I think you are right. And how about Chateau Bader-Ginsburg?
I think you have something there...let's get the rest of the Supreme Culprits as well, Breyer,Ginzburg, Stevens, and so on.
Why stop there? Where does Ruth "Vader" Ginsberg live?
Oh, please let this happen! LMAO...
Only if this guy pulls it off and starts a chain with the homes of the other four. Great idea though. I'm impressed by the creativity and the fact that someone with the means actually loves his country enough to try it.
He wants to call it "The Lost Liberty Hotel". Very good name don't you think?
BRILLIANT!!!
Only if this guy pulls it off and starts a chain with the homes of the other four. Great idea though. I'm impressed by the creativity and the fact that someone with the means actually loves his country enough to try it.
Souter may just retaliate and admit he's already been using his home as a "boys rooming house" for commercial endeavors.
However, receipts may be a bit hard to come by...
Not to quibble but the phrase is "hoisted on his own petard", which means to be blown up by ones own bomb, not lifted on the end of a stick.
The Supreme Court has ruled that there cannot be a Nativity Scene in Washington DC this Christmas season.
This isn't for any religious reason, they simply have not been able to find three wise men and a virgin in the Nation's capitol.
There was no problem, however, finding enough asses to fill the stable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.