Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish Group Bashes Commandments Ruling
NewsMax ^ | 6/27/05 | NewsMax

Posted on 06/27/2005 6:50:41 PM PDT by wagglebee

Don Feder, President of Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation, said Americans should be up in arms over the Supreme Court's Ten Commandments decisions.

"The Court persists in its tradition of deliberately misinterpreting the First Amendment's Establishment Clause," Feder complained. "An 'establishment of religion' means a national church - not a crèche in a park at Christmas, not a moment of silent meditation at the start of the school day, and not a public display of the Ten Commandments."

Feder explained," The Court has put itself in a bind - hence its often wildly inconsistent rulings on so-call separation cases, which are often decided on points so fine you'd need an electron microscope to discern them."

In the two decisions announced today, a Decalogue monument on the grounds of the Texas Capitol - one of 17 displays spread over 22 acres - was allowed. While in the Kentucky cases, it declared unconstitutional framed copies of the Ten Commandments on display inside two county courthouses (also camouflaged by secular documents).

"What's the difference?" Feder asked. "Was one constitutional because it was on the outside and the other unconstitutional for being inside?"

Feder observed: "What seemed to particularly enrage the court's majority was a proclamation by the counties that their monuments were intended to emphasize 'America's Christian heritage.' According to the Court, this clearly showed the displays 'religious intent.'"

"America's Christian heritage? Who do the honorable justices think started America? Were the Pilgrims Buddhists, the Puritans Zoroastrians? Was our Constitution written by secular humanists?" Feder inquired.

"The Court's majority continues to promote the great fiction that America just sort of happened. In fact, the greatest nation on earth was the end result of nearly 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian history. If not for the epic encounter at Sinai, there would have been no 13 colonies, no Declaration of Independence, no United States Constitution and no justices sitting in a chamber decorated with a frieze of Moses carrying the Ten Commandments tablets."

Feder called on Christians and Jews to join together to fight for our Biblical heritage.

Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation was organized to combat anti-Christian bias in the media, Hollywood, the bureaucracy and the judiciary.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianheritage; christianity; donfeder; jews; judaism; judeochristianity; mccreary; scotus; tencommandments
"The Court persists in its tradition of deliberately misinterpreting the First Amendment's Establishment Clause," Feder complained. "An 'establishment of religion' means a national church - not a crèche in a park at Christmas, not a moment of silent meditation at the start of the school day, and not a public display of the Ten Commandments."

Perfect!

1 posted on 06/27/2005 6:50:42 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"An 'establishment of religion' means a national church..."

I wonder what other sinister purpose the Court has in mind? It is becoming more and more irrelevant every day.

Semper Fi

2 posted on 06/27/2005 6:58:47 PM PDT by An Old Man (USMC 1956 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I don't live near Washington but, isn't it time to Freep the Supreme Court? High level media exposure should be brought to bear upon the public dissatisfaction with this ruling and the one which eviscerates private property rights.


3 posted on 06/27/2005 7:02:54 PM PDT by Socratic (Honor the Liberator - He toils for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I am wondering if they intentionally, as socialists, sounded a call of triumph with their eminent domain ruling.

I think they are about creating a socialist state.

The question is this: are these the times that try men's souls?


4 posted on 06/27/2005 7:07:22 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"I think they are about creating a socialist state. "

I tend to agree with you on that.

In regard to the trial of men's Souls, perhaps.

Semper Fi

5 posted on 06/27/2005 7:21:07 PM PDT by An Old Man (USMC 1956 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

While a framed copy of the ten commandmnts is now unconstitutional, I'll bet they'd allow a statue of Muhammad holding up a severed head.


6 posted on 06/27/2005 7:29:50 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

All in the name of "tolerance" of course!

TLR


7 posted on 06/27/2005 7:47:33 PM PDT by The Last Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Alia
Ping!

The part of the Septuagint with these writings in it was the part that the Alexandrians translated the most accurately (despite educated disagreements on what was done there with the Prophets and Writings). ...not advocating that all accept that version (as even I don't), BTW, but the most important message is in it. Besides, we could post our own version.
8 posted on 06/27/2005 8:10:19 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson