"The Court persists in its tradition of deliberately misinterpreting the First Amendment's Establishment Clause," Feder complained. "An 'establishment of religion' means a national church - not a crèche in a park at Christmas, not a moment of silent meditation at the start of the school day, and not a public display of the Ten Commandments." Perfect!
1 posted on
06/27/2005 6:50:42 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
"An 'establishment of religion' means a national church..." I wonder what other sinister purpose the Court has in mind? It is becoming more and more irrelevant every day.
Semper Fi
2 posted on
06/27/2005 6:58:47 PM PDT by
An Old Man
(USMC 1956 1960)
To: wagglebee
I don't live near Washington but, isn't it time to Freep the Supreme Court? High level media exposure should be brought to bear upon the public dissatisfaction with this ruling and the one which eviscerates private property rights.
3 posted on
06/27/2005 7:02:54 PM PDT by
Socratic
(Honor the Liberator - He toils for you.)
To: SJackson; Alia
Ping!
The part of the Septuagint with these writings in it was the part that the Alexandrians translated the most accurately (despite educated disagreements on what was done there with the Prophets and Writings). ...not advocating that all accept that version (as even I don't), BTW, but the most important message is in it. Besides, we could post our own version.
8 posted on
06/27/2005 8:10:19 PM PDT by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson