CONCLUSION: Radio listeners - especially Limbaugh listeners - are bad extreemists, while newspaper readers are reasonable people that like to get along with others.
This study was paid for by the powers behind thew "Main-Stream-Media"
what a bunch of horse shit
1 posted on
06/27/2005 6:01:16 PM PDT by
rface
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: rface
To paraphrase my favorite conservative of the last century-
"Polarization, in the defense of liberty, is not a vice".
2 posted on
06/27/2005 6:03:29 PM PDT by
RedStateRocker
(Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6)
To: rface
Conservative listeners have their ideals reinforced by the shows, which ultimately lead to even more extreme views, What a load of crap.
3 posted on
06/27/2005 6:04:17 PM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: rface
I believe Pew is the same group that ginned up that phony groundswell support for "Campaign Finance Reform" that resulted in the McCain-Feingold Act.
With this, are they trying to open the door for a revival of the Fairness Doctrine?
To: rface
Conservative listeners have their ideals reinforced by the shows, which ultimately lead to even more extreme views, Wanta said.The horrors.
The use of an unscientific term like "extreme" renders this entire study worth less than a festering bowl of dog snot.
5 posted on
06/27/2005 6:04:50 PM PDT by
Maceman
(The Qur'an is Qur'ap.)
To: rface
6 posted on
06/27/2005 6:04:57 PM PDT by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: rface
"I am a radio listeners. I would like lower taxes" <-- Extremist
"I read newspapers. I support partial birth abortion, homosexual marriage, and government ownership of the means of production." <-- Moderate.
To: rface
"Overall, our findings point to radio as a reason for the increasing polarization of the U.S. public" That's right, it's all about Rush. The Left's descent into complete insanity has nothing to do with it.
8 posted on
06/27/2005 6:06:05 PM PDT by
JennysCool
(In a perfect world, where everything is equal, I own the film rights and am working on the sequel)
To: rface
"Overall, our findings point to radio as a reason for the increasing polarization of the U.S. public"Ok. I'll bite. The good people are just saying "No" to liberalism because the liberal news papers can't fool them anymore.
So what's the problem? It sounds like good news to me!
To: rface
I read the entire newspaper before going to work each day as well as listening to the radio, which includes about 30-40 minutes of Rush most days.
This probably explains the schizophrenia.
13 posted on
06/27/2005 6:10:35 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: rface
15 posted on
06/27/2005 6:13:02 PM PDT by
mmercier
(the prince and the discourse)
To: rface
You forgot: The only extremists are on the right.
17 posted on
06/27/2005 6:15:04 PM PDT by
stands2reason
(GINOBILI and HORRY are my MVPS!!!)
To: rface
leave it to the puke research center to come up with a high school sophomoric scam.
18 posted on
06/27/2005 6:15:06 PM PDT by
ken21
(it takes a village to steal your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: rface
Gee Rush, after all these years, they are STILL blaming you for influencing your audience. I can remember when the libs thought you weren't relevent, LOL.
To: rface
Snoozepapers.......*YAWN*
20 posted on
06/27/2005 6:15:52 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(I'm the white Christian that Howeird Dean warned you about.)
To: rface
If this is the best they can do in an attempt to save their miserable behinds. The MSM deserves eveery lost reader they keep showing the door.
This is the Dean speech by the MSM. People that don't buy our papers are just a bunch of White-Christian,Conservatives, that have never made an honest living.
That ought to boost circulation....NOT.
21 posted on
06/27/2005 6:17:33 PM PDT by
marty60
To: rface
How did they do this study and ignore Air American and NPR?
22 posted on
06/27/2005 6:17:40 PM PDT by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: rface
"By narrowly concentrating their information consumption on content that reinforces their views, Internet users potentially could experience the same reinforcing process that could be taking place with conservative radio listeners,"Conclusion #2:Internet users could also become extremists, if no constraints are present.
Of course, this lamebrain garbage doesn't bother to address the fact that most newspaper content is recycled crap coming from the same few (lying) sources...
24 posted on
06/27/2005 6:18:25 PM PDT by
LRS
To: rface
Yup. Guess I just haveta chuck my radio out the winder to get rid of my "extremism."
Meanwhile, Bill Moyers is still on the People's Broadcasting System, spewing hate and lies...
25 posted on
06/27/2005 6:18:34 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
To: rface
No Mention that Rush Limbaugh is right 98% of the time(documented)and when he is wrong he corrects it...The print media follows NYT, and we know about the NYTs' reliablity.How do we know about it?Right,Rush Limbaugh,Drudge..etc..this is really an attack on the alternative media........nobody is going to buy it.
26 posted on
06/27/2005 6:19:58 PM PDT by
Reconray
To: rface
How about this: Radio listeners are most aggressive in communicating their political views, newspaper readers least aggressive.
I'm basing this on the fact that you have to call repeatedly, wait, pass a screener, and then get a few minutes with the host, vs. buying a paper, reading a column, and then, maybe, writing a letter to the editor.
-PJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson