"Not attacking the Clintons is the biggest mistake the Republicans can make.",br>
I couldn't agree more. These two vultures need total exposure...........FASTER, PLEASE!
1 posted on
06/27/2005 1:23:24 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
To: Eastbound; Marauder; tuffydoodle; BethforAmerica; Seaplaner; knews_hound; snarks_when_bored; ...
2 posted on
06/27/2005 1:25:37 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE
Bill O'Reilly - who is not a conservative but is the number one ranked host on Fox News Channel Not anymore he isn't. Greta's #1. How funny is it that the top two shows on Fox, the supposed conservative channel, are a CNN courtroom retread and a big mouth tabloid tv retread from...what network was he from, anyway? Old Roger Ailes knows how to make money, boy, and it ain't by bringing quality programming to market.
3 posted on
06/27/2005 1:27:08 PM PDT by
Huck
(Conservatism jumped the shark with George W. Bush)
To: CHARLITE
4 posted on
06/27/2005 1:29:20 PM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: CHARLITE
Klein is a liberal why would I want to give him my money?
5 posted on
06/27/2005 1:29:39 PM PDT by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: CHARLITE
I heard Lucianne on Tony Snow - she was slamming the book. Given Lucianne's penitent for lying. This is the first independent confirmation for me that the book might be worth something.
To: CHARLITE
How much more exposure will be enough? We already know how slimly the ex-President is, and She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is the most dishonest person to be in politics since......well, I can't think of anyone who is comparable (At least Lucifer, Prince of Darkness, has enough respect for me to bother telling good lies).
The point is that nobody's opinion is going to be changed by this book.
7 posted on
06/27/2005 1:32:49 PM PDT by
wolfpat
(dum vivimus, vivamus)
To: CHARLITE
Ed Klein's book seems to be as puerile as the couple it exposes. I have no interest in it. The "rape" allegation is so disgusting and out of bounds that it made me consider whether hillary herself put him up to it, so she could use it to get sympathy from women.
9 posted on
06/27/2005 1:42:11 PM PDT by
montag813
To: CHARLITE
I read the book and don't know what the big deal is
American Evita was a lot worse
10 posted on
06/27/2005 1:46:52 PM PDT by
uncbob
To: CHARLITE
He obviously did not read a page of it because, if anything, the book repeats much of what has previously been published elsewhere.
*******************
Respectfully duisagree.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, when you know you're going to get the same result!
The Clintons have been bashed forever for their debauchery, deceit and scandals- it only serves to fortify their base.
Lazio attacked Hillary personally- he lost by 14 points.
There is one way Hillary is going to be defeated (and she will be defeated) if she runs for president- and it's to demonstrate by the record that she is a RADICAL!
There'll be a time to make that case. To attack her now based that which "repeats much of what has previously been published elsewhere" is only going to serve to put more money into her political coffers.
Conservatives shouldn't be exploited as foils by which she raises funds. Disregard this book- keep your power dry-and don't get taken in again.
Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-
Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we cant GET OUT of terrorism.
11 posted on
06/27/2005 1:48:40 PM PDT by
sirthomasthemore
(I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
To: CHARLITE
"Not attacking the Clintons is the biggest mistake the Republicans can make."
-----
Absolutely true. The Clintons have skated to the extent it is not an exaggeration to say that they have proven that CRIME PAYS IN POLITICS. It is sickening to see the MSM (not a suprise) bowing to the CLINTON THREATS which had to part and parcel to the whole deal of cancelling appearances of the author. How much money did Soros put on the table to intimidate the networks?
Hitlery is an extremist-Marxist. She is evil and driven by a power-lust that has really never been seen on the left at the left of Presidential hopefuls, at least not in my lifetime. Many of us who follow the Clinton trail of debauchery and crime, already know most of what is in the book, but the book needs support because it does provide the realities of Hitlery for the less-than-informed sector of our society. For some reason, when I see this woman, I am reminded of what kept Stalin in power in Russia...a mind-numbed, blind, brain-washed society that idolized him, in spite of his causing untold millions of deaths and extreme levels of oppression. Lots of parallels.
The liberal who wrote the book about Queen Darth Vader, given his research, those he extracted information from, provides a credible description of the hard leftist poster-princess...
17 posted on
06/27/2005 2:00:53 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: CHARLITE
Disagree and shows again why newsmax's claims always must be fact checked. Those on the right defending this trash show their true colors. Just because smears (kitty kelly etc..) happen on the left, doesn't mean we should do it on the right. It is sensationalist, biased, distorted, and no I haven't read it and don't plan to, but the 'rape claim' and 'suggested photo' of bill cheating are enough, along with various other claims...
I congratulate those on the right standing for principle.
I think even Rush is backing away from this. As far as I could tell his only point was that there was a double standard in the media over it, which he is correct in, but so what? We already knew that.
22 posted on
06/27/2005 2:38:08 PM PDT by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/scotuspropertythieving.htm)
To: CHARLITE
The book does nothing to advance or raise the level of political debate in this country. It does nothing to inform voters on the issue and, from what I've heard, is a fairly unsavory read.
25 posted on
06/27/2005 4:23:38 PM PDT by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: CHARLITE
IMHO, this book is nothing more than an effort by the author, on behalf of the far left, to sweep away all the trash that has littered the clinton's past.
The object of the book is get everyone talking, ad nauseum, about all the peccadillo's rumored about hillary, so that the general public is fully inoculated by the time she races for the presidential nomination.
Will we ever learn?
I posted the above in an earlier post and think that I have to repeat it because there seems to be many people who have bought into scam by the libs.
The best reaction Conservatives should adopt, in my opinion, is to berate the author and his deceptive writings. With both Conservatives and liberals going after this toadie and his scribblings, he would be relegated to trash heap, where he belongs.
Don't fall for the leftist deceit and trickery...AGAIN.
To: CHARLITE
I don't care what the talking heads think. I'm going to read the book, and pass it on to friends. Why not? It's my money.
To: CHARLITE
What ever happened to former Sen Fred Thompson's promise to get to the bottom of the donation from the Chi-Com military to Bill's election campaign? Did Hillary get similar contributions during her 'listening tour' and run-up to the Senate?
36 posted on
06/27/2005 5:46:18 PM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson