Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Make Mistake Not Supporting Ed Klein's Book - (isn't this what Rush also says?)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 27, 2005 | JOHN LeBOUTILLIER

Posted on 06/27/2005 1:23:18 PM PDT by CHARLITE

In the midst of the media firestorm over Ed Klein's blockbuster book, "The Truth About Hillary," we can see the moral cowardice and equivocation that can destroy our nation from within.

Yes, the very effective Clinton spin machine has worked with their allies in the so-called Mainstream Media to censor Klein and keep him off the TV airwaves.

But that was to be expected. NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC and CNN are all predictable. They are all left-leaning - and they all succumbed to pro-Hillary pressure.

Like all liberals they talk one game and live another. ‘Diversity' and ‘freedom of choice' only apply to them when it helps their cause. But allowing someone with a different point of view to share air time is a big no-no.

So we could have predicted the obvious censorship surrounding "The Truth About Hillary."

But what we could not have predicted was so many craven so-called ‘conservatives' who bailed out on the Klein book in an obvious attempt to curry favor with the chablis and brie cocktail party set.

One conservative at the normally sane New York Post incorrectly stated that Ed Klein wrote that "Hillary is a lesbian." Precisely the opposite is the case: Ed Klein has repeatedly said and written, "I do not know" her sexual preference.

Another GOP strategist, said he "wanted to take a shower" after reading the book. He obviously did not read a page of it because, if anything, the book repeats much of what has previously been published elsewhere. Klein uses sourced material to paint a comprehensive picture of Hillary the political candidate.

Still another strategist attacked Klein and said his book could create a "sympathetic backlash" for Hillary. What nonsense!

Bill O'Reilly - who is not a conservative but is the number one ranked host on Fox News Channel - had the temerity to trash the Klein book - even before he obtained a copy of it - in order to burnish his ‘independent' credentials. But the real truth is that he is dying to interview Hillary! He has been angling for that interview for months. These members of the Right played right into the Clintons' hands. Not attacking the Clintons is the biggest mistake the Republicans can make.

1992, 1996 and Hillary in 2000 were all the same: the strategy of "not attacking" caused Clinton victories. There are also some very courageous conservatives who have had the guts to stand behind the Ed Klein book. Among them:

Rush Limbaugh, the very first radio host to see that the Hillary spin machine was censoring Ed Klein and his book. Rush is a genius at analyzing the motives of the Left. Sean Hannity, who had the guts to withstand pressure and put Ed on both his radio show and Fox's Hannity & Colmes. Radio host Mike Gallagher who also withstood tremendous pressure. The Washington Times' Editorial Page Editor Tony Blankley - who actually read the book - and wrote a fair and honest review.

Laura Ingraham who interviewed Ed Klein and was very supportive. Thank goodness some people have the intellectual honesty to read a book before commenting on it!

Those on the Right who attacked "The Truth About Hillary" ought to be ashamed of themselves. They are intellectually dishonest with a separate - and selfish - agenda.

This book is exposing the fault lines in American politics. You are either on one side or the other.

As was once said, "All that is required for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." By doing "nothing" to take on Hillary, these so-called conservatives are helping the Clintons return to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

For the sake of this nation's future, we cannot allow this to happen.

We must have the courage to fight.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abouthillary; book; conservatives; edklein; interviews; mistake; pilloryhillary; publicity; publishing; republicans; support; thetruth; truthabouthillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: montag813
"The "rape" allegation is so disgusting and out of bounds that it made me consider whether hillary herself put him up to it"


But there is NO "rape allegation" in the book! Klien simply writes of an incident as told by a someone who was with slick at that time. The broohaha over a "rape allegation" is nothing more than democRAT spin in an effort to discredit the book.

21 posted on 06/27/2005 2:27:32 PM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Disagree and shows again why newsmax's claims always must be fact checked. Those on the right defending this trash show their true colors. Just because smears (kitty kelly etc..) happen on the left, doesn't mean we should do it on the right. It is sensationalist, biased, distorted, and no I haven't read it and don't plan to, but the 'rape claim' and 'suggested photo' of bill cheating are enough, along with various other claims...

I congratulate those on the right standing for principle.

I think even Rush is backing away from this. As far as I could tell his only point was that there was a double standard in the media over it, which he is correct in, but so what? We already knew that.


22 posted on 06/27/2005 2:38:08 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/scotuspropertythieving.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

"Lazio attacked Hillary personally- he lost by 14 points."

He was kid gloves to her, he did much less than you see in most campaigns ... eg. what Boxer did to Herschenson etc.


23 posted on 06/27/2005 4:02:03 PM PDT by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Does she tell the truth? Look into how she tried to destroy Jim Rob. Why isn't FR linked to drudge?


24 posted on 06/27/2005 4:20:24 PM PDT by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

The book does nothing to advance or raise the level of political debate in this country. It does nothing to inform voters on the issue and, from what I've heard, is a fairly unsavory read.


25 posted on 06/27/2005 4:23:38 PM PDT by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomSurge

I dind't know she tried to destroy him. I heard someone insulted Drudge and he took FR off this site...?


26 posted on 06/27/2005 4:26:03 PM PDT by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
Partners in Power bump. Roger Morris's book truly is one of the most insightful of the Clinton tomes. The part about the psychological "toughening up" of Chelsea ought to be disseminated as far and wide as possible.
27 posted on 06/27/2005 4:36:59 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: montag813; Gunrunner2
"The "rape" allegation is so disgusting and out of bounds that it made me consider whether hillary herself put him up to it, so she could use it to get sympathy from women."

It is a little frustrating to keep hearing people say how "turned off" and "disgusted" they are with the "rape allegations" in this book.

There are NO "rape allegations" in the book. Klein merely quotes an ear and eye witness to having heard Bill Clinton make a statement in Bermuda, that he was "going to go rape" his wife.

Nowhere does Klein suggest that a rape happened. Maybe the statement was an example of Bill Clinton's kinky sense of humor.

Ed Klein, on the few TV and radio interviews he has been allowed to have, has said (as he does in the book), that he has never known and still doesn't know what Hillary's sexual preferences are. i.e. he has never said that she is a lesbian.

So, both the "rape" and the "lesbian" charges as being "over the top" aren't in this book! People read headlines in tabloids while waiting at the supermarket check-out counter, and assume that Ed Klein alleges things in the book that he doesn't. No "rape" charges. No "lesbian" charges.

Char :)

28 posted on 06/27/2005 4:38:42 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I've read the book.

The "rape" thing was clearly a Billy-boy quip more than anything else.

The Lesbian thing is how Hitlery surrounded herself with lesbo's and females of "ambiguous sexuality." Never alleges she was ever a lesbo.
29 posted on 06/27/2005 4:44:35 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; All

my copy arrived today from Amazon. I found the chapter on Watergate most interesting. I would suggest we all buy it, read it, pass it around to our friends, but shut up about it.

That is the best way to drive the liberals (and Hillary) nuts.


30 posted on 06/27/2005 4:53:22 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
IMHO, this book is nothing more than an effort by the author, on behalf of the far left, to sweep away all the trash that has littered the clinton's past.

The object of the book is get everyone talking, ad nauseum, about all the peccadillo's rumored about hillary, so that the general public is fully inoculated by the time she races for the presidential nomination.

Will we ever learn?


I posted the above in an earlier post and think that I have to repeat it because there seems to be many people who have bought into scam by the libs.

The best reaction Conservatives should adopt, in my opinion, is to berate the author and his deceptive writings. With both Conservatives and liberals going after this toadie and his scribblings, he would be relegated to trash heap, where he belongs.

Don't fall for the leftist deceit and trickery...AGAIN.
31 posted on 06/27/2005 5:03:19 PM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Bill O'Reilly - who is not a conservative but is the number one ranked host on Fox News Channel

Not anymore he isn't. Greta's #1. How funny is it that the top two shows on Fox, the supposed conservative channel, are a CNN courtroom retread and a big mouth tabloid tv retread from...

I think it's just their time slots. Right now, 'ol blow hard "I'm looking out for me" O'Reilly is on, but there's nothing else on this time of night, either - and we have satellite!

32 posted on 06/27/2005 5:11:17 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I don't care what the talking heads think. I'm going to read the book, and pass it on to friends. Why not? It's my money.


33 posted on 06/27/2005 5:12:55 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman
>>The best reaction Conservatives should adopt, in my opinion, is to berate the author and his deceptive writings.<<

So Hitlery is not a scheming socialist, power-mad witch? That his book deceptive. . .a lie? A deliberate misrepresentation of the truth?

Sorry, the libs won the Billy-boy game by using your recommended tactic of deny, mock and marginalize the truth. I will not yield the field without a fight to inform. Timing could have been better. . .should have taken a page from the Swift Boat guys. Other than that, the book is accurate--as everyone seems to agree that there is nothing new. So what is it. . ."deceptive" or accurate. Either way some are arguing to give her a pass on both counts.
34 posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:58 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
He was kid gloves to her

****************
You're right there, WOSG. I was referring to that one debate, that the feminists and MSM harped on over and over, where he walked over to her podium and confronted her. Do you recall? Poor little defenseless Hillary attacked by a stalker!



Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

35 posted on 06/27/2005 5:31:06 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
What ever happened to former Sen Fred Thompson's promise to get to the bottom of the donation from the Chi-Com military to Bill's election campaign? Did Hillary get similar contributions during her 'listening tour' and run-up to the Senate?
36 posted on 06/27/2005 5:46:18 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

"Disregard this book- keep your power dry-and don't get taken in again."

BUMP to that!


37 posted on 06/27/2005 6:57:39 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ("Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist." -- John Adams. "F that." -- SCOTUS, in Kelo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Thanks, exile. Nice update to tag line. -:)


Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

38 posted on 06/27/2005 9:01:22 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Sir Thomas, I respectfully disagree with your comment...There will be a time to attack Radical Hillary [later], but let's do it when we're ready and let's do it on our terms. Let's not play into her hands.

I believe that the early and unvarnished truth about Hillary should be told early and often.

If she has to defend herself against (liberal) Klein, Hillary is the story. If she defends herself against a conservative, the VRWC becomes the story.

The earlier Ms. Clinton is confronted with the truth about her past, the less time she has to think up ways to wangle out of it.

That said, I'm concerned as to why author Klein (according to Peggy Noonan) "...ignores the Rosetta stone of Hillary studies, the senior college thesis she wrote on leftist organizer Saul Alinsky and how to change the American political culture, which her alma mater, Wellesley College, obligingly continues to suppress on her request."

All-in-all, I may be weakening from my earlier highly skeptical position, and I'm leaning toward adding the book to my ever-expanding conservative library.

.

39 posted on 06/27/2005 9:36:43 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
If she has to defend herself against (liberal) Klein, Hillary is the story. If she defends herself against a conservative, the VRWC becomes the story.

****************

Seaplaner, I think that's the problem with article that's the subject of the thread. The liberal media isn't going to do the dirty work here, they're trying to goad the conservatives (Rush, Hannity, etc) into attacking Hillary. THEN, the liberal media turns around and says the VRWC is doing another hatchet job. Klein is just the bait.

Now, you're right as to the Rosetta Stone. And if this book was about the Rose law firm and billing records, my opinion would differ. But, it's not.

Buy the book if you must. Just know that your money goes to Klein, and do you have any doubt who he'll be contributing to in the next presidential election? Ironic, your conservative dollars going to elect Hillary. -:)

See your point though, and respect your view, Seaplaner.



Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

40 posted on 06/27/2005 10:09:29 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson