Posted on 06/26/2005 4:05:03 PM PDT by kristinn
Code Pink leader Jodie Evans, in a blog posted from the World Tribunal on Iraq, today gave her open support to the terrorists in Iraq who are killing American soldiers and Iraqis
While some may wonder, "is this news?" it is, indeed. Code Pink has been very careful over the past three years to maintain a front of being a peace group. In fact, it's complete name is Code Pink Women for Peace. The veil slipped when co-leader Medea Benjamin shot her mouth off in Jordan last December when she proclaimed the group was giving $600,000 in cash and aid to the families of "the other side" in Fallujah.
Recently, Code Pink has been holding weekly Friday night vigils at the main gate to Walter Reed Army Medical Center to express their phony support for the men and women recuperating from their war wounds. I wonder how the soldiers and families at Walter Reed will take the news that the pink sign holding people have given their support to the terrorists in Iraq.
The D.C. Chapter will be sure to tell them at our next patriotic counter-demonstration there.
Here are Jodie Evans' remarks, preserved for posterity:
We must begin by really standing with the Iraqi people and their right to resist. I can remain myself against all forms of violence, and yet I cannot judge what someone has to do when pushed to the wall to protect all they love. What does the Iraqi resistance have to lose? They are fighting for their country, to protect their families and to preserve all they love. They are fighting for their lives, and we are fighting for lies. It is so amazingly obvious; we must get out of Iraq now. They will rebuild their country, it will take time, a long time, but they cannot start until we are gone.
Code Pink now joins ANSWER as publicly endorsing the terrorists. This has been a sticking point between ANSWER on one side and Code Pink and United for Peace and Justice on the other. I expect them all to support the terrorists publicly by the time Sept. 24-26 rolls around in Washington, D.C.
The leftists are planning "non-violent direct action and civil disobedience" in D.C. on Monday Sept. 26. When they tried that two years ago, the D.C. police swiftly disrupted their plans by arresting leftist protesters demonstrating without a permit. Since then, successful lawsuits were filed against the D.C. police and the D.C. City Council passed a law severely restricting the cops' ability to preserve law and order in the city when protests get out of hand.
Code Pink will be there and I'm sure their terrorist allies will be cheering them on.
Well his past commentaries were very... suspicious. I mean, I understood some of his concerns but he was pretty suspicious nontheless.
But that's not why he got banned, I think.
Look at his tagline: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1431186/posts?page=37#37
I can imagine what conservative forum this guy will join next. I'd rather not say which, but I imagine he'd be MIGHTY comfortable over there with "Blond Knight" and those other F.R. kick-outs. As far as they're concerned, "paleo" is an understatement for that rat pack. Nothing wrong with paleo conservatives, just the racist ones.
Or, of course, the guy could just set up a dummy e-mail and a new name over here.
We're in for a tough time the next few months as the emboldened leftists in Congress work to peel off weak-kneed Republicans.
Great find...Ping!
Code Pink feminazis: if they can't have what they want right now through their usual lies, they lie about our country to the world and openly support our enemies.
So much for moderator impartiality...
Thanks Jim.
Guillermo was just your typical lefty who *pretends* to be so ultra "conservative" that from his view, Bush is bad. His sole focus on *every* thread was bashing Bush, regardless of topic.
Nothing more than a cheap trick; a professional disruptor.
So she excludes the majority there who definitely do NOT want to see a reign of Saddam Hussein Version II?
Very perceptive! I'm wondering if but what their name was actually intended to be that...
Very perceptive! I'm wondering if but what their name was actually intended to be that...
Our nations terrorists don't all carry ordnance and firearms.........pick her up, close down their web site and freeze'n seize their funds. Homeland Security has done it with known terrorists organizations before have they not ?
Bookmark.
We must begin by really standing with the Iraqi people and their right to resist. I can remain myself against all forms of violence, and yet I cannot judge what someone has to do when pushed to the wall to protect all they love. What does the Iraqi resistance have to lose? They are fighting for their country, to protect their families and to preserve all they love. They are fighting for their lives, and we are fighting for lies.
It's not just a question of "believing" in guns - where are they going to GET them? How many leftists can pass a background check to buy one? Would your average leftist be able to walk into a gun shop or show, look around at all those guns, & have a clue how to even begin to buy a gun?
Yet another Rove was right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.