Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top court favors eminent domain (Dozens of NJ towns thrilled! "Open season on neighborhoods!")
Bergen Record ^ | Friday, June 24, 2005 | JOHN BRENNAN

Posted on 06/24/2005 10:19:47 AM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
For Sharpe James, Bob Torricelli, the entire mobbed up developer/construction industry, NJ Democrats, unions, etc., yesterday's ruling was better than winning a megamillions lottery. It was like a mega-billions lottery.

Congratulations to all!

1 posted on 06/24/2005 10:19:47 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead

Ive been away for a few days, how have the liberals reacted to this ruling?


2 posted on 06/24/2005 10:24:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

This is the End of Private Property in America.

And since Private Property is what enables our economy, one could say this is the beginning of the END period.


3 posted on 06/24/2005 10:25:32 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead


Next comes finding the 2nd amendment unconstitutional so that there will be no armed rebellion.

Dems have turned into 18th century Tories.

Whodathunkit.


4 posted on 06/24/2005 10:26:31 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Exactly. This decision has to be the best illustration ever of how disconnected the lib justices are from reality. I can speak from personal experience to tell you that in NJ this will be used to make the democrats' cronies richer and more powerful. "Redevelopment" is just the latest gimmick they use, right up there with paying millions to preserve "open space" owned by their buddies which couldn't have been developed anyway.

We have a Constitutional right to teenagers getting abortions and murderers constantly getting new trials, but this Court saw no need to protect the rights of people to protect their property from government seizure. Oy.

5 posted on 06/24/2005 10:27:24 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"Ive been away for a few days, how have the liberals reacted to this ruling?"

DU is up in arms about it.

Unfortunately they are too stupid to apply their outrage to the already existing confiscatory schemes, like wealth redistribution tax policies, even though it's the same crap.


6 posted on 06/24/2005 10:27:51 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Ive been away for a few days, how have the liberals reacted to this ruling?

The Sierra club is feigning outrage, but one can only assume the silence of the left is a sign of glee. They have been trying to get all property into the hands of the state for decades.

7 posted on 06/24/2005 10:28:15 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

"End period..."

I'm not so sure. The government has to pay for the property, first of all, and when they zone for businesses, those businesses require workers. Some places are just zoned wrong, filled with section-8 housing, crime-ridden, etc. So long as it is used sparingly and intelligently, it can be a good thing.


8 posted on 06/24/2005 10:28:34 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

DUers hate it as well, but don't know what to think that the libs on the court are responsible for it. The NYTimes came out with an editorial in favor of it. Shows the traditional disconnect between the leaders and the 'masses'.

more on this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1429877/posts?page=1


9 posted on 06/24/2005 10:30:35 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/canadahealthcare.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

The way I read the decision, the Supremes said it was a local decision and if they legislature wants to rein in the developers, they can.


10 posted on 06/24/2005 10:31:00 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
The ruling does not preclude the state Legislature in Trenton from passing a law restricting the use of eminent domain.

This ruling is going to ensure each and every one of these legislators in Trenton much much nicer vacation homes down the Jersey shore, a new Lexus for the wife, and a few post-Ivy-league education years bumming around Europe for their kids.

11 posted on 06/24/2005 10:31:19 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Ive been away for a few days, how have the liberals reacted to this ruling?

I wandered over to DU (a stranger in a strange land moment for me). They are outraged by the decision. They are also disheartened that their "good liberal" justices voted for property confiscation while the "evil fascists" voted for property rights.

12 posted on 06/24/2005 10:31:31 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead; Calpernia; Joe Brower; NautiNurse
So, the new rule is: if you have a view or maybe there is oil under your land, you may be moving.

The Beverly Hillbillies of 2005 would lose their bubbling crude.

13 posted on 06/24/2005 10:31:58 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.conservative-spirit.org... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Notice how other states (PA, TX, CA, etc.) have introduced bills right away to limit eminent domain, while still other states (FL, UT, etc.) already have laws limiting it.

And where is NJ? Where is Forrester? (Is that the sound of silence I hear?)


14 posted on 06/24/2005 10:32:00 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (News junkie here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mudblood
So long as it is used sparingly and intelligently, it can be a good thing.

Soft of like abortion in other words.....?

There is no guarentee of proper and fair payment. They pay you the going rate for a run-down cracker box house, and make mega-billions on the shopping malls placed on the property.

Yet we all know that the market, left to its own devices will properly reflect future earnings of a piece of property.

15 posted on 06/24/2005 10:33:03 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead

You're as cynical as I am about this ruling and the state of NJ!


16 posted on 06/24/2005 10:33:07 AM PDT by tropical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

What the Constitution says…What the Constitution means…
17 posted on 06/24/2005 10:33:22 AM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Redistribution of wealth has begun and the rich will get richer thanks to five euro us supreme crt justices.


18 posted on 06/24/2005 10:33:36 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.conservative-spirit.org... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
The NYTimes came out with an editorial in favor of it.

The NYT is involved in snagging some prime Manhattan real estate for its new headquarters.

19 posted on 06/24/2005 10:34:01 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mudblood
This is going to be used EVERYWHERE. Are you kidding? That, and where the hell do you think that money comes from? Taxes. Even if the developer manages to then turn around and pay it back to the locality, which isn't a sure thing, there will be other tax incentives paid to the big developers to build there.

Here in Austin the attourney general was already giggling with glee to apply this for a new downtown parking garage project where someone else already has a business.

"Those who rob from Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul". Writ nationally now.

20 posted on 06/24/2005 10:34:07 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson