Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead

The way I read the decision, the Supremes said it was a local decision and if they legislature wants to rein in the developers, they can.


10 posted on 06/24/2005 10:31:00 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wildbill
The way I read the decision, the Supremes said it was a local decision and if they legislature wants to rein in the developers, they can.

Absolutely. And no one gets this.

72 posted on 06/24/2005 12:25:49 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: wildbill; AmishDude

Did they declare that double jeopardy and forcing people to testify against themselves were local options too?

Is it only the federal government that can't deprive someone of life or liberty without due process?


81 posted on 06/24/2005 1:32:53 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: wildbill
The way I read the decision, the Supremes said it was a local decision and if they legislature wants to rein in the developers, they can.

Riiiight. I can just see the NJ legislature falling all over itself to rein in developers.

The only way this happens is if enough people get in touch with their representatives and tell them that they don't want the state, county or city to be able to exercise eminent domain based on "economic" reasons, and the only way that happens is if this stays in the news.

91 posted on 06/24/2005 6:47:27 PM PDT by dbwz (2A Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson