Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Win for Big Government (Kelo v New London)
The Washington Times ^ | June 24, 2005

Posted on 06/23/2005 10:37:53 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore

Cities may now seize homes and businesses and hand them over to private developers to raise tax revenue. That's what the Supreme Court decided yesterday in Kelo v. New London, a 5-4 ruling that strips Connecticut homeowner Susette Kelo and several others of their homes and land. By siding with New London, the court drastically expands traditional eminent-domain powers beyond highways and fighting urban blight. This is a resounding defeat for ordinary landowners and a threat to property rights. Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; connecticut; eminentdomain; kelo; landgrab; newlondon; tyranny; tyrrany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
"Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to."

************

Great line!

The Battle of New London isn't over yet. Get your muskets and pitchforks, and march to the sound of the guns. -:)

1 posted on 06/23/2005 10:37:53 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
"Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to."

I don't mind moving, but my guns might have another thing to say about it!

2 posted on 06/23/2005 10:40:33 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

Has anyone heard el Presidente's take on this?


3 posted on 06/23/2005 10:41:54 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

First we got used to accepting that we are only allowed to keep as much of our income as the government "lets" us keep. Now they have ratcheted it up to include real property. I don't see how this is materially different than what Mugabe did to white farmers in Zimbabwe.


4 posted on 06/23/2005 10:45:58 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

This is unbelievable. The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.

So what's the solution folks? After a decade of Republican control of the Congress and a half decade of Republican control of the White House and Congress it's come to this?

Absurd. A socialist policy to further the ambitions of the robber-barons of industry.


5 posted on 06/23/2005 10:51:46 PM PDT by Old_Mil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

The landowners should lock themselves in their house, raise the Gonzales "Come and Take it Flag" of Texas Independence, and arm themselves. Make the government come and physically take their property at the barrel of a gun on national television.


6 posted on 06/23/2005 10:58:39 PM PDT by bstein80 (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
This stands the Fifth Amendment's takings clause on its head.

Just what kind of remedy do the people have when the Supreme Court makes an unconstitutional ruling?

Who overrules the judiciary?

7 posted on 06/23/2005 10:58:43 PM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

--- I don't see how this is materially different than what Mugabe did to white farmers in Zimbabwe.---

Exactly what my wife said. Here it is the courts doing it though. The Dims are getting pushed out of elective office, so now they're using the courts as a last resort. Here's a case where I live:

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2005/06/23/news/news01.txt

It's something new every day. The courts are running Fish and Game and Forestry.


8 posted on 06/23/2005 11:00:47 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Bears repeating.

Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to.

9 posted on 06/23/2005 11:03:35 PM PDT by jwalsh07 ("Su casa es mi casa!" SCOTUS 6/23/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bstein80
The landowners should lock themselves in their house, raise the Gonzales "Come and Take it Flag" of Texas Independence

And they will broadcast that a cult of fanatics are hold-up in their compound molesting children.

Then they will send in the tanks.

While the rest of America watches it on TV and cheers.

10 posted on 06/23/2005 11:05:18 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.

Next decision will be about quartering British troops in our homes.

11 posted on 06/23/2005 11:07:18 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

Why start a new thread on this subject?


12 posted on 06/23/2005 11:07:19 PM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Well, at least lately, Mugabe doesn't mouth platitudes about how Zimbabwe provides equality under law and protects its citizens' rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, let alone stops private property from being stolen, er, taken for others' private use. So maybe it's a little less hypocritical when it happens there.


13 posted on 06/23/2005 11:07:49 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
I don't mind moving, but my guns might have another thing to say about it!

That is prime tagline material...

14 posted on 06/23/2005 11:08:40 PM PDT by TheOtherOne (I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

All your property are belong to SCOTUS.


15 posted on 06/23/2005 11:10:34 PM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

This is quite a tragedy. I certainly hope they were at least required to give Ms. Kelo compensation.


16 posted on 06/23/2005 11:12:44 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bstein80
In other news, bstein80 was arrested under orders of the Department of Homeland security under provisions of the Patriot Act. His whereabouts are unknown.



Some other thoughts from wise people:




17 posted on 06/23/2005 11:13:41 PM PDT by Old_Mil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro
Has anyone heard el Presidente's take on this?

I've been wondering all day why I haven't heard any White House reaction to one of the most outrageous Supreme Court rulings in recent memory. I guess Bush isn't in any real danger of losing his Crawford ranch to a Wal*Mart building project, but he should show some outrage and some compassion for those less fortunate souls who will lose their property because of this horrible ruling.

18 posted on 06/23/2005 11:14:28 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Breakdown of Justices:

Opinion of the Court: Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg

Dissent: O'Connor, Scalia, Rehnquist, Thomas

19 posted on 06/23/2005 11:15:40 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

"Next decision will be about quartering British troops in our homes."

Not one cent for tribute? Whaddya mean? We pay our UN dues and keep those aid shipments goin' to North Korea and Islamist countries!


20 posted on 06/23/2005 11:16:06 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson