Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to."

************

Great line!

The Battle of New London isn't over yet. Get your muskets and pitchforks, and march to the sound of the guns. -:)

1 posted on 06/23/2005 10:37:53 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sirthomasthemore
"Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to."

I don't mind moving, but my guns might have another thing to say about it!

2 posted on 06/23/2005 10:40:33 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

Has anyone heard el Presidente's take on this?


3 posted on 06/23/2005 10:41:54 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

First we got used to accepting that we are only allowed to keep as much of our income as the government "lets" us keep. Now they have ratcheted it up to include real property. I don't see how this is materially different than what Mugabe did to white farmers in Zimbabwe.


4 posted on 06/23/2005 10:45:58 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

This is unbelievable. The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.

So what's the solution folks? After a decade of Republican control of the Congress and a half decade of Republican control of the White House and Congress it's come to this?

Absurd. A socialist policy to further the ambitions of the robber-barons of industry.


5 posted on 06/23/2005 10:51:46 PM PDT by Old_Mil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
This stands the Fifth Amendment's takings clause on its head.

Just what kind of remedy do the people have when the Supreme Court makes an unconstitutional ruling?

Who overrules the judiciary?

7 posted on 06/23/2005 10:58:43 PM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
Bears repeating.

Homeowners now own their homes only if the government wants them to.

9 posted on 06/23/2005 11:03:35 PM PDT by jwalsh07 ("Su casa es mi casa!" SCOTUS 6/23/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

Why start a new thread on this subject?


12 posted on 06/23/2005 11:07:19 PM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

All your property are belong to SCOTUS.


15 posted on 06/23/2005 11:10:34 PM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

This is quite a tragedy. I certainly hope they were at least required to give Ms. Kelo compensation.


16 posted on 06/23/2005 11:12:44 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
Breakdown of Justices:

Opinion of the Court: Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg

Dissent: O'Connor, Scalia, Rehnquist, Thomas

19 posted on 06/23/2005 11:15:40 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1574059&mesg_id=1574059

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1575546&mesg_id=1575546

DU, of all places, doesn't like the ruling.


22 posted on 06/23/2005 11:21:55 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore

This is a big reason why we need to make sure we elect good people to local government. City Council and Mayor positions are more important now than even since they can now tear down your home to give a development present to the mayor's brother in law.........who is a developer.


33 posted on 06/23/2005 11:38:08 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (Stop the Land Grabs - Markman, Taylor, Young, or Corrigan for SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
I see very little mention that an existing "Italian Dramatic Club (a private cultural organization)" gets saved but "the homes of three plaintiffs in that parcel are to be demolished." That bit of land, parcel 4A is for unspecified "park support." To the homeowners, that means the government plans to pave their paradise and put up a parking lot!

If there was a thorough review of the alternatives, what happened to the alternative that preserved existing housing stock to the maximum extent practical? What gave priority to a dramatic club at the expense of private homes? (no need to answer that one!)

Well, I hope the BRAC proposal to shut down the remaining base facilities there makes Pfizer reconsider their participation, everyone pulls out since they think the economy will tank completely, and the city is left holding the bag. It would serve them right. Maybe GWB can propose a refinery to take the place of the sub base. That will boost the local economy. Somehow I don't think they'll go for it, though.

Incidentally, under the guise of "follow the money," while no one apparently benefited directly from this proposed taking, it might be interesting to look at land sales of the surrounding parcels that will also receive a boost in value due to the project. That might just prove to be interesting.

39 posted on 06/24/2005 12:30:50 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

bttt


40 posted on 06/24/2005 12:35:39 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
Anyone looking for insight into the bigger picture in what is happening here, this article is a must-read:

When Tyranny Came to America"

Print it. Study it. And pass it along. And pray it's not already to late to turn back the hellish tide of socialism that is sweeping across our nation at an ever-increasing pace.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

43 posted on 06/24/2005 2:32:05 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
And here we thought the Left stood up for the Little Guy. It turns out they stand up for Big Corporations and Big Government. So much for private propety rights indeed.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
45 posted on 06/24/2005 4:06:46 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
The Ballad of Carl Drega
46 posted on 06/24/2005 4:25:16 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sirthomasthemore
This is the natural follow-on to Revised Statute 2477, the socialist law that is being used by rich kids to seize land from traditional ranchers in the west.

Ask Congress to repeal RS 2477 and protect private property!

See The Official RS 2477 Home Page
and POSRP
67 posted on 07/04/2005 8:42:45 PM PDT by stop_rs2477
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson