Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio Candy Stunt Not So Sweet (Woman sues when "100 Grand" prize turns out to be chocolate bar)
The Smoking Gun ^ | 06-23-05 | The Smoking Gun

Posted on 06/23/2005 10:41:16 AM PDT by rawhide

JUNE 23--A Kentucky woman who thought she won $100,000 in a radio station giveaway is suing for breach of contract after learning that her prize was actually a Nestle's 100 Grand candy bar. According to the below June 22 Circuit Court complaint, Norreasha Gill, 28, claims that she was listening to Lexington's WLTO-FM on the evening of May 25 when host DJ Slick announced that he would award "100 Grand" to the tenth caller. When Gill, the pregnant mother of three children, was that tenth caller, the radio host told her she could pick up her prize the following day at WLTO's studio. She subsequently learned that the contest was a "joke," according to her lawsuit, which names the radio station's parent company, Cumulus Media, as a defendant. Gill's lawsuit seeks the $100,000 prize and additional punitive damages. The 22-year-old DJ Slick, whose real name is Jason Hamman, is no longer working for WLTO, a departure apparently hastened by the May stunt. Hamman, pictured at left, declined to speak about the "100 Grand" incident when contacted by phone today. In a May 25 blog posting promoting that night's giveaway, Hamman wrote that he would be presenting "our loyal listeners with a chance to Win 100 GRAND!!!! It's sitting in a bag to my left ready for someone to take off with just like the Runaway bride!" The tenth caller, he added, would be "100 GRAND RICHER!!! No joke."

(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 100grand; chocolate; deceit; deejaystunts; lawsuit; nomodstoday; onemoretime; prize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Rokurota

touche


41 posted on 06/23/2005 11:52:37 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I'll bet the radio station would have filed charges against her if she crashed their server by sending 500 million e-mails, or depleted the ink in their fax machine by faxing them a black sheet of paper a couple of hundred times.

This woman lost nothing, and did no work worthy of remuneration. The only thing that she had was injured greed.
42 posted on 06/23/2005 12:07:42 PM PDT by politicket (Our Supreme Court just destroyed our land...any Patrick Henry's out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: politicket
Blackstone is so 19th Century.

She deserves every cent. It was not a joke, it was fraud. Many fraudsters think their frauds, are funny. They aren't.

43 posted on 06/23/2005 12:08:51 PM PDT by NathanR (Mexico: So far from God; So close to the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; Publius6961

Thank you both.


44 posted on 06/23/2005 12:16:34 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
What is the legal distinction between an "on-air radio joke" and outright fraud (i.e., if a radio station promoted a contest with a cash prize but then refused to pay the winner)?

This sounds like fraud to me. The station should grow up and pay up. Firing the guy was not enough.

45 posted on 06/23/2005 12:30:35 PM PDT by GOPJ (Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: politicket

You could make the same statement about a case involving a retailer that advertises a product for $19.99 but then won't sell it for less than $500.


46 posted on 06/23/2005 12:33:26 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

I'm not sure of the timeframe, but it was indeed Opie and Anthony.


47 posted on 06/23/2005 12:35:45 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Gill's lawsuit seeks the $100,000 prize and additional punitive damages.

Whats more pathetic that she is suing for the one hunderd grand or that she wants punitive damages on top of it... how sad it is when lawyers run our culture.

Personally I thinks its funny. If I was her I would probably not, but I would still not sue..

48 posted on 06/23/2005 12:38:21 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

When the sharks line up to feed.. the big ones feed first...then the little ones..


49 posted on 06/23/2005 12:38:36 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: politicket

And she may be laughing all the way to the bank.


50 posted on 06/23/2005 12:38:47 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

Almost lost it there.. very funny..


51 posted on 06/23/2005 12:38:56 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

If she doesn't want the candy bar..........I'll take it.


52 posted on 06/23/2005 12:39:36 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You could make the same statement about a case involving a retailer that advertises a product for $19.99 but then won't sell it for less than $500.

Find me such a case.

53 posted on 06/23/2005 1:03:45 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

She should win. I'm tired of this kind of crap. They are going to have to start watching what they say.


54 posted on 06/23/2005 1:05:15 PM PDT by greccogirl ("Freedom belongs to those who are willing to sacrifice the most for it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

It's funny you ask. It may be that if she "accepted" the candy bar...the lawsuit is off the table.


55 posted on 06/23/2005 1:22:25 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

It's a true story. See post 20.


56 posted on 06/23/2005 1:26:56 PM PDT by glock rocks (Get er done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

I can see that one, that was a contest at work where they pulled some sorry crap. Now if they had given her the yoda nad say 1K/2K as a 'please be a good sport' I cuold say well its an aweful joke but not lawsuit worthy..


57 posted on 06/23/2005 2:10:35 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Think about it.....I have 100 Grand....sitting in a bag... right here....

$100,000 cash handoff?? I don't think that is really even possible except in a drug or arms deal.

58 posted on 06/23/2005 2:20:40 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Did they ever mention "dollars?"


59 posted on 06/23/2005 2:24:14 PM PDT by TwoSue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwoSue

Not according to the story, but the tenth caller was to become "100 grand richer", which certainly implies dollars.


60 posted on 06/23/2005 2:32:26 PM PDT by MortMan (Mostly Harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson