Skip to comments.
She-Male Bill Pushed By Senator Ted Kennedy (Democrats Still Forging Ahead With Pro-Gay Agenda
TraditionalValuesCoalition ^
| June 9, 2005
| Staff
Posted on 06/22/2005 6:39:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
If I took treatments to darken my skin, could I claim African-American on the next census form?
There IS no such thing as a sex change operation any more than one can change race. The DNA is unchanged.
It is merely a cosmetic surgery (including sometimes a "castration") by mentally ill members of society who have unstable opinions of self-worth.
There is NO "wear the clothes of the opposite sex" gene. We are born naked. All fashion is cultural.
There can be no more protection from "hate crimes" (refusal of service, violence, insults, termination from work) for cross-dressers than there can be for someone who chooses to wear a tutu, suit of armor, punk rock ripped jeans and mohawk, Donald Duck costume, or profanity labeled shirt.
When will there be hate crimes laws to protect the fat, 4-eyed, pimple faced, braces wearing, brainy nerd in school? Answer, never.
We are all due certain civil rights. The right to not be insulted does not exist. That is free speech. The right to not be hit or beaten exists for everyone and the motive plays no part in sentencing. Employers and businesses are not required to give anyone a job or service.
A person's politics are also not protected by "hate crimes" laws. So in America after President Bush won, you had employers and hotels that discriminated against Republicans.
If Fat Ted, the Swimmer, ever stood up for THEIR rights, I might give a crap.
21
posted on
06/22/2005 8:14:03 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
To: gridlock
Unisex bathrooms for all. Although there will be special stalls with glory holes for those who like to engage in anonymous same sex encounters in public.
If you think I am taking this too far, The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has already voiced out seeking to decriminalize cruising for public sex.
Sexual Freedom Activists Target 'Archaic, Unjust' Sex Laws
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1148916/posts
22
posted on
06/22/2005 8:19:56 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
To: kjenerette
23
posted on
06/22/2005 8:26:15 AM PDT
by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...if we can keep it!)
To: weegee
That's how I see it. Alot of people with more detailed
knowledge of DNA told me I was wrong. There are all
kinds of combos. I think that those combos are nature's
mistakes. We should feel bad for them, not change the
world.
24
posted on
06/22/2005 8:28:08 AM PDT
by
jusduat
(I am a strange and recurring anomaly)
To: jusduat
People who are born hermaphrodites are extremely rare. Generally they are "sex assigned" on the basis of dominant genitalia even if the hormones are different. Mad scientists is what they are.
And how many persons with dual genitalia have both eggs and sperm production and as well as a womb?
Rather than arguing the "freedom" to have sex with whatever you want, they try to claim "scientific proof" that this is normal. It is a soft sell for a deviant agenda just as "safe sex education" in the classrooms got condoms past the door without a discussion of IF kids should even be engaging in intercourse. The homosexual agenda is merely a battering ram to society's laws and mores for the bigger sex positive agenda, which has as its vision seeing everyone sexually active at every age. They see abstinence as wrong, not because it doesn't work, but because it is a "denial" of sexual desires.
I guess that we should all be banging hot looking relatives and friends' married spouses. To not do so would be suppressing these feelings. The Sex Positive proponents don't have a problem with this actually. They want no moral judgments to be made over any pairings.
25
posted on
06/22/2005 8:40:36 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
To: deadeyedawg
"
Looks like the Cutty Sark has finally rotted Chappaquiddick Ted's brain."
Methinks Teddy's brain rotted a long -- a very long -- time ago.
What we see now is the effect of rotted brain that has marinated in liberal juices (along with an unhealthy dose of Cutty Sark) for a long period of time.
26
posted on
06/22/2005 9:12:41 AM PDT
by
chs68
To: chs68
I always thought it pretty cool that when told to go f*** ones self, that you could actually do it.
Sorry, I am biting my tongue here.
27
posted on
06/22/2005 9:32:44 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: EQAndyBuzz
"
I always thought it pretty cool that when told to go f*** ones self, that you could actually do it."
Actually, I would not be able (nor would I want) to accomplish that feat.
Were you perhaps thinking of someone else?
Was it something I said?
28
posted on
06/22/2005 11:56:27 AM PDT
by
chs68
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
This Senate "hate crimes" folly - or really, worse than folly, could tripe be evil? just won't die. It's like the Undead or something. Ted Kennedy and Gordon Smith - an unlikely twosome, keep pushing it over and over again.
It's really too bad the Republican Party in OR couldn't come up with something better than Smith. A more moderate faux Republican it would be hard to imagine.
I certainly hope it doesn't pass the Senate, and if it does, that the House kills it.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
29
posted on
06/23/2005 12:23:04 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: little jeremiah
This whole "hate crimes" thing, is all a bunch of $hit, as far as I am concerned.
All part of the big plan.
30
posted on
06/23/2005 3:57:23 PM PDT
by
Rca2000
(America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
To: Nowhere Man
31
posted on
06/23/2005 3:57:45 PM PDT
by
Rca2000
(America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
To: Rca2000
The next immediate step after "hate crimes" is "hate speech", since it causes "hate crimes". And the step after that? "Hate thought".
After that? Forced incarceration in mental hospitals or re-education camps, or forced medication.
People may say, "Oh, it can't happen here". Ha.
32
posted on
06/23/2005 4:00:00 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: little jeremiah
Well-- it DID happen in Canada-- the Bible is considered"hate speech" there.
25 years ago, how many people would had said" the government will never try to sanction "gay marriage". I'll bet most of them would have felt things would never come to this. And here we are.
Lenin would had been proud, of how well as his "big plan" is working, here in the U.S.
33
posted on
06/23/2005 5:38:03 PM PDT
by
Rca2000
(America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
To: deadeyedawg
Looks like the Cutty Sark has finally rotted Chappaquiddick Ted's brain.He HAD a brain?? Who would have guessed???
34
posted on
06/23/2005 5:39:33 PM PDT
by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: Rca2000
25 years ago, how many people would had said" the government will never try to sanction "gay marriage". I'll bet most of them would have felt things would never come to this. And here we are.
Tell me about it. I don't know how homosexual marriage came up in history class, I think it was about some guy who advocated it in the 1500's, and a lot of us either laughed or just commented by saying, "how retarded." This was 1979 when we were in 7th grade. There was a time when things like this would get you laughed at if not worse. Think about it, if you went back to 1900 and said that one day abortion would be legal and easy to get, you would have gotten a lot of "never will happens" and/or people will think you're a kook.
35
posted on
06/24/2005 10:17:56 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - DeCAFTA-nate CAFTA!)
To: gridlock
Can you just see the US military in five years if this goes through?
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Shemale? What in the blue hell???
I don't even want to know. Crossdressers and drag queens(aren't they the same damn thing) and ITS(trans) are bad enough.
37
posted on
06/24/2005 10:23:52 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
(Stop the Land Grabs - Markman, Taylor, Young, or Corrigan for SCOTUS)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
hate crimes bill that will include federal protection for cross-dressers, drag queens, transsexuals, and she-males They don't seem to have a problem with flushing the unborn but let's protect these freaks. That means they are trying to force employers to hire these people or else be charged with a "hate crime"?!
There is not a bad idea that Ted Kennedy has not tried to push and usually gets by with it. He seems to be able to find some dumb*ss Republican to join him in most of it.
38
posted on
06/24/2005 10:35:18 PM PDT
by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson