1 posted on
06/21/2005 9:16:19 PM PDT by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Hey, babe, you know what they say about bad publicity better than no publicity?
2 posted on
06/21/2005 9:18:08 PM PDT by
Old Sarge
(In for a penny, in for a pound, saddlin' up and Baghdad-bound!)
To: ambrose
including discussion of whether or not she shaved her legs at college. Upon reading these words and entertaining the visual, my quality of life just nose-dived.
3 posted on
06/21/2005 9:18:59 PM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.)
To: ambrose
Craig Shirley, said: "This stuff makes your skin crawl. It could backfire and make Hillary a more sympathetic figure." It could backfire and make Hillary a more sympathetic figure.
4 posted on
06/21/2005 9:22:36 PM PDT by
Horatio Gates
(Peas through superior fertilizer!)
To: ambrose
6 posted on
06/21/2005 9:23:01 PM PDT by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: ambrose
She's a communist. What more does one need to know?
7 posted on
06/21/2005 9:24:37 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: ambrose
Hillary's paramour, Oink Johnson:
8 posted on
06/21/2005 9:25:20 PM PDT by
tahotdog
To: ambrose
I really, really do not want to read about Hillary's Pap Smears.
10 posted on
06/21/2005 9:42:50 PM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(Recall Barbara Boxer)
To: ambrose
If it is true, is it a "smear"? I think then, it would be called a "fact".
13 posted on
06/21/2005 9:57:33 PM PDT by
fish hawk
(I am only one, but I am not the only one.)
To: ambrose
So the truth becomes a "smear". Pretty easy to tell a liberal media link.
14 posted on
06/21/2005 10:16:08 PM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: ambrose
Right-wing websites had claimed the book would torpedo Mrs Clinton's widely anticipated candidacy for the presidency in 2008 No, they did not make that claim. This is Hillary's strategy of creating her own victimhood to generate sympathy. Ed Klein wrote the book as a favor to her campaign.
To: ambrose
The talk is that the left is responsible for the release of this book in order to get the "dirty detials" of Hillary's secrets out into the open and wear them down prior to ther 2008 run.
The only problem is that no one really cares right now. The other problem is that the concept of sordid lesbian love affairs and Hillary are basically inseperable. It's hard to imagine one without the other after observing her behavior in the WH for 8 years.
She is irreperably tainted by these stories and will never shake them.
Whether it's enough to keep her from stealing enough votes in 2008 remains to be seen.
17 posted on
06/22/2005 2:10:46 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: ambrose
Some prominent figures branded it nasty and counter-productive. But is it TRUE!!?
18 posted on
06/22/2005 6:34:39 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: ambrose
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
