Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 21, 2005

Posted on 06/21/2005 12:41:10 PM PDT by robowombat

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states Feds say violent, elite paramilitary units establish narcotics routes north of border

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: June 21, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – The ultra-violent, U.S.-trained elite, Mexican paramilitary commandos known as the "Zetas," responsible for hundreds of murders along the border this year, have expanded their enforcement efforts on behalf of a drug cartel by setting up trafficking routes in six U.S. states.

A U.S. Justice Department memo says the U.S.-trained units have recently moved operations into Houston, San Antonio and the states of California, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida. They have been operating in Dallas for at least two years, according to the feds.

The original Zetas are former Mexican army commandos, some apparently trained in the U.S. by Army special forces to combat drug gangs. Members of a broader Zetas organization have worked for the Gulf cartel since 2001. They provide firepower, security and the force needed to oversee shipments of narcotics and smuggled aliens along the border and up Interstate 35, which runs through Texas and Oklahoma.

According to FBI officials, the Zetas are attempting to consolidate their grip on the smuggling route along I-35. Anyone caught not paying the 10 percent commission they charge on all cargo – drugs or humans – is killed, according to U.S. and Mexican law enforcement sources.

The Zetas have also brought their cold-blooded killing tactics to the U.S., say federal law enforcement authorities – murdering rival drug dealers and sometimes innocent bystanders.

"Texas law enforcement officials report that the Zetas have been active in the Dallas area since 2003," said the Justice Department intelligence bulletin circulated among U.S. law enforcement officials. "Eight to ten members of the Zetas have been involved in multiple assaults and are believed to have hired criminal gangs in the area ... for contract killings."

The feds say the group has begun establishing its own trafficking routes into the United States and will protect them at any cost.

"U.S. law enforcement have reported bounties offered by Los Zetas of between $30,000 and $50,000 for the killing of Border Patrol agents and other law enforcement officers," the bulletin said. "If a Zeta kills an American law enforcement officer and can successfully make it back to Mexico, his stature within the organization will be increased dramatically."

The Zetas take their name from a radio code once used by its members. While originally there were 68, the Zetas have trained a second generation of commandos – many of them sons and nephews of those trained by U.S. military forces to combat drug trafficking in Mexico. U.S. law enforcement officials say they now number more than 700. Their numbers also include some Mexican army deserters and former federal police officers.

U.S. and Mexican law enforcement authorities say the Zetas operate special training camps in the Mexican states of Tamaulipas and Michoacán, where newly recruited Zetas take intensive six-week training courses in weapons, tactics and intelligence gathering.

The Zetas conducting a bloody war for control of the entire southern border in an effort to secure a monopoly on drug-smuggling and people-smuggling routes, according to law enforcement officials.

At least 600 have been killed this year in a wave of violence waged by the Zetas gang, headed by reputed drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, said Mexico's Attorney General Daniel Cabeza de Vaca.

Among the victims of the U.S-trained Zetas have been other suspected smugglers, hit men, police, soldiers and civilians on both sides of the 2,000-mile border.

There are widespread reports of the commandos making cross-border runs into U.S. territory in military-style vehicles, armed with automatic weapons.

The U.S. government spent millions of dollars training Los Zetas to intercept drugs, some of them coming from Mexico's southern border, before they could reach the U.S. The U.S. government has also sent U.S. Border Patrol agents to Mexico's southern border with Guatemala to train law enforcement and military forces to intercept human smugglers destined to reach the U.S.

Guzman, whose nickname means "Shorty," bribed guards to escape from prison in 2001. He is one of Mexico's most-wanted fugitives. U.S. authorities have offered a $5 million reward for his capture.

The spike in killings and kidnappings in northern Mexico in recent months has made headlines and prompted federal agents and soldiers to patrol the streets of Nuevo Laredo, across from Laredo, Texas. Recently, a new police chief in Nuevo Laredo was assassinated nine hours after taking office.

Among the 600 people murdered in gang shootings across the Mexican border this year, many were slain execution-style, with their hands tied behind their backs.

The violence along the border has reached a point where some are questioning President Vicente Fox's ability to govern the country.

A senior U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration official, Anthony Placido, told Congress last week that Mexico's corrupt police forces were "all too often part of the problem rather than part of the solution" in fighting the drug cartels.

Fox won office in 2000, ending 71 years of one-party rule and promising to clamp down on the multibillion-dollar cross-border trade in cocaine, marijuana and heroin.

While initially winning praise for putting bosses like Benjamin Arellano Felix and Osiel Cardenas behind bars, his crime-busting reputation has been undermined by the alarming rise in violence, along with evidence Fox has failed to clean up Mexico's police forces.

Faced with the fallout on its southern frontier, the State Department has twice issued travel warnings for the Mexican border, where more than 30 U.S. citizens have been kidnapped.

Mexico's apparent inability to curb the bloodshed on the 2,000-mile border is affecting the financial markets. Banking group HSBC said "staggering" levels of violence could raise questions about Mexico's stability in the run-up to next year's presidential election. Fox is constitutionally barred from running for re-election.

His approval rating has taken a hit, dropping 3 points to 56 percent in a poll in May, with many Mexicans complaining of safety fears, particularly in the north.

Fox has pledged a "mother of all battles" against the drug traffickers he says are openly challenging the government.

"We have taken on the challenge and we will do battle against all the cartels' criminals and against organized crime," Fox said in a speech Friday.

He sent hundreds of troops and federal agents to the states of Tamaulipas, Sinaloa and Baja California last week after suspected drug hit men killed the police chief of Nuevo Laredo.

Despite the move, drug gangs shot and killed at least 11 people across the three states during the week, prompting observers to declare the operation, dubbed "Mexico Secure," a failure.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; dhs; hispanicterrorgroup; illegalaliens; mexico; wodlist; zetas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-311 next last
To: Iron Matron

baja californisa is in MEXICO not the USA


221 posted on 06/22/2005 3:28:16 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron
I get what you are saying about letting these people die, but often they get others people addicted, or give other people diseases like aids and as they die, they can be costing us hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in taxpayer money.

The better thing would be to further stigmatize drug users. Get Americans more disgusted with them, spit at them, shun them.
If the drug user got into productive life instead of drugs, there would be income tax coming in instead of going out with these people.

Drug enforcement needs to also kill off a lot more of these distributors and dealers while in the process of arrests. Would be good for everyone IMO.
222 posted on 06/22/2005 3:28:21 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: 1L
Heavens, you are talking self responsibility with drug activists and libertarians here.

This has about as much chance of getting through as Star Jones through the eye of a needle.
223 posted on 06/22/2005 3:32:06 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: G32
The WOT is for the 'general welfare' of the citizens. I'm surprised you support it.

Hogwash. It is an issue of national defense, just like WWII.

And absolutely I believe everyone that buys illegal drugs is supporting terrorism.

You dodged my question, so let me try it a different way. Would a regulated drug market, similar to alcohol, result in less money for criminals and terrorists?

224 posted on 06/22/2005 3:33:26 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

"Would a regulated drug market, similar to alcohol, result in less money for criminals and terrorists?"

Answer: Short answer: Maybe. Worth the cost? No.

Long answer:

Also, maybe they'd move into the bio/chem/nuclear weapons biz if they lost this market totally. Who knows?


225 posted on 06/22/2005 3:39:48 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: G32

I managled that post. Rewrite..


Short answer: Maybe. Worth the cost? No.

Long answer: Maybe they'd move into the bio/chem/nuclear weapons biz if they lost this market totally. Who knows?


226 posted on 06/22/2005 3:40:32 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Like is said:

"So who are all the violent people carrying all the illegal drugs across from Mexico to the United States?"

Jeez... Who are they- they're criminals. The question you should be asking is why- because drugs are illegal and there's a demand.

Having said that, I'll point out that I don't agree with the willy-nilly use of drugs as a means of instant gratification or simply to get high, I believe there's a difference between using and abusing. (Incidentally, I don't smoke, not even cigs, and rarely if ever drink- and I don't use drugs because they're illegal).

Further, I contend that the drug problem is primarily one of misuse, which stems from our terrible socialist education system and a society that ignores the subject of emotional health and intelligence, and a poor class with very little from which to derive happiness.

But like guns, knives and whatnot, the problem is not with the objects themselves, but the misuse and abuse of them.

227 posted on 06/22/2005 3:40:43 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Crap impersonating intellectual discourse is the final fruit of decadence (It's time the Left left!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

So if we legalize rape, mutilations, beatings, shootings by law, it will all go away?


228 posted on 06/22/2005 3:43:16 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
WHY have we allowed cowardly politicians, arrogant egocentric judges, twisted entertainment figures, and biased journalists turn us into such a nation of compliant whimps???

Just sign me "Disgusted".

Seems only one option. Another poster said it the other night, and it didn't involve voting.

I agree with you, it's a very alarming when those we pay to protect and defend our country don't.

What another person said was, why do we keep electing the same people over and over? It's a good question.

You mentioned American history. Many years ago American leaders didn't make careers out of politics. Now, they all do, and make life long careers out of it. Long ago, they served one term and went back to the farm or where ever.

This in my opinion is one of the biggest problems.

Look at those in Politics. That's all they know, and go from one office to another, riding the wave. Look at those in Congress and the Senate. Most have been there for many years. City counsel members go on to be county supervisors, then Mayors, and then any number of positions in state governments.

Lets face it. The longer they are in office the more the potential for corruption. It's no secret.

They cultivate friends and buddys over the years, and we know where all this goes from there.

229 posted on 06/22/2005 3:43:21 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

One thing I find interesting..

Gun ownership is very high in the USA because they are legal. They are very low England where it's illegal.

Personally, I prefer an armed society. However, I strongly believe legality and ease of buying is directly correlated with how much of something is bought.

If the libertarians had their way, meth would be as easy to buy as a coke. hmmmmmmmm... Not that hard to figure out that people picking it up to give it a shot would skyrocket.


230 posted on 06/22/2005 3:47:50 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: G32

Why are illegal drug activists present at FR?

Addiction isn't a conservative behavior, so why is FR so connected with anarchist and liberal libertarians with this issue?


231 posted on 06/22/2005 3:53:03 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I suppose because conservativism is stuck with warped libertarianism which is a tiny step away from anarchism.


232 posted on 06/22/2005 3:54:29 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: G32
Libertarians aren't conservative IMO, they are just liberals that want small nearly nonexistent government and civilization.
They are the party of vice.
233 posted on 06/22/2005 3:57:00 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
So if we legalize rape, mutilations, beatings, shootings by law, it will all go away?

You're being silly and you know it.

This has become a circular argument- once again, those are activities- a drug, any drug, is merely an inanimate object. Are you afraid a steel pipe is going to sprout legs and jump up and hit you in the head?

Do you feel like going around this circle again? Because I don't. You have a mind designed for intelligent thought- use it.

234 posted on 06/22/2005 4:03:57 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Crap impersonating intellectual discourse is the final fruit of decadence (It's time the Left left!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
A knife is an inanimate object until it enters a human body, so what's the difference.

Your trying to play games and dance around the facts that illegal drugs are pure cr@p. They are for mostly criminal types with little or no connection to self responsibility of conservatism.
235 posted on 06/22/2005 4:06:46 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Your trying to play games and dance around the facts that illegal drugs are pure cr@p. They are for mostly criminal types with little or no connection to self responsibility of conservatism.

Some people use drugs to indulge in self-destructive behaviours, certainly. Cocaine and morphine are used as anesthetics, but can be misused or abused- as I said, it's a result of behaviour, which stems from poor education and character development.

236 posted on 06/22/2005 4:12:11 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Crap impersonating intellectual discourse is the final fruit of decadence (It's time the Left left!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

A lot of educated people use drugs. It's all poor judgement and character and disregard of the law as far as I am concerned.


237 posted on 06/22/2005 4:22:41 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: G32
Bash the criminals, not the law.

Any law that causes reasonably forseeable, serious harms is a bad law. That was true of Prohibition I and is also true of Prohibition II. One would have to be stupid or blind to not bash bad laws. (In fact, your comment denies that bad laws could possibly even exist! Stupid or blind.)

238 posted on 06/22/2005 4:28:13 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Bestiality and pedophilia, now there's a couple practices where I wouldn't mind changing the law. Just shoot on sight. We can hold a trial later to if an animal was accidentally shot in the process.

I don't think we would be releasing more people with problems on society if managed the same way as alcohol. They are already in our everyday lives, but living in the shadows. I want them out where I can see them. It would make it easier to spot them. They aren't all people living terrible lives. I recall the sons of a mayor and the lead narcotics detective in a California city I lived in being the biggest drug dealers around. This was before Nixon launched our present "War on Drugs". (Yeah, I'm one of those Viet Nam era, hippy aged guys.)

What would improve is that the gang violence involved in the present distribution scheme would be stopped cold. The other thing that would end is the crooked politician on the payroll. They are there, just as they were there in the days of bootlegging.

When I have a business lunch, and people in the group start ordering beer, they've helped me decide with that simple act how trustworthy I think they might be. Spending company money on alcohol is a serious issue with me. If they order a second or third, they've closed the door on future business dealings, and I'll tell them why. I have the same attitude toward drug users.

I wouldn't want to remove the stigma for any substance abuse. That goes for drugs, alcohol, and any other substance. In fact, I wish our elected would make the alcohol distributors stop glorifying alcohol and show some of what it really does. That's not likely to happen as long as the distributors keep the campaign coffers full though.

BTW, I see a lot less morality and respect in the generation following mine, so I'd expect things to get much worse before they improve.

I am glad we can discuss this.
239 posted on 06/22/2005 4:28:56 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

During the AWB, I didn't put folding stocks on post-ban rifles. You follow the law and try to get it changed while you are under it.

At least, that's what adults do. What you do, who knows.


240 posted on 06/22/2005 4:29:50 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson