Posted on 06/21/2005 12:41:10 PM PDT by robowombat
Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states Feds say violent, elite paramilitary units establish narcotics routes north of border
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: June 21, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON – The ultra-violent, U.S.-trained elite, Mexican paramilitary commandos known as the "Zetas," responsible for hundreds of murders along the border this year, have expanded their enforcement efforts on behalf of a drug cartel by setting up trafficking routes in six U.S. states.
A U.S. Justice Department memo says the U.S.-trained units have recently moved operations into Houston, San Antonio and the states of California, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida. They have been operating in Dallas for at least two years, according to the feds.
The original Zetas are former Mexican army commandos, some apparently trained in the U.S. by Army special forces to combat drug gangs. Members of a broader Zetas organization have worked for the Gulf cartel since 2001. They provide firepower, security and the force needed to oversee shipments of narcotics and smuggled aliens along the border and up Interstate 35, which runs through Texas and Oklahoma.
According to FBI officials, the Zetas are attempting to consolidate their grip on the smuggling route along I-35. Anyone caught not paying the 10 percent commission they charge on all cargo – drugs or humans – is killed, according to U.S. and Mexican law enforcement sources.
The Zetas have also brought their cold-blooded killing tactics to the U.S., say federal law enforcement authorities – murdering rival drug dealers and sometimes innocent bystanders.
"Texas law enforcement officials report that the Zetas have been active in the Dallas area since 2003," said the Justice Department intelligence bulletin circulated among U.S. law enforcement officials. "Eight to ten members of the Zetas have been involved in multiple assaults and are believed to have hired criminal gangs in the area ... for contract killings."
The feds say the group has begun establishing its own trafficking routes into the United States and will protect them at any cost.
"U.S. law enforcement have reported bounties offered by Los Zetas of between $30,000 and $50,000 for the killing of Border Patrol agents and other law enforcement officers," the bulletin said. "If a Zeta kills an American law enforcement officer and can successfully make it back to Mexico, his stature within the organization will be increased dramatically."
The Zetas take their name from a radio code once used by its members. While originally there were 68, the Zetas have trained a second generation of commandos – many of them sons and nephews of those trained by U.S. military forces to combat drug trafficking in Mexico. U.S. law enforcement officials say they now number more than 700. Their numbers also include some Mexican army deserters and former federal police officers.
U.S. and Mexican law enforcement authorities say the Zetas operate special training camps in the Mexican states of Tamaulipas and Michoacán, where newly recruited Zetas take intensive six-week training courses in weapons, tactics and intelligence gathering.
The Zetas conducting a bloody war for control of the entire southern border in an effort to secure a monopoly on drug-smuggling and people-smuggling routes, according to law enforcement officials.
At least 600 have been killed this year in a wave of violence waged by the Zetas gang, headed by reputed drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, said Mexico's Attorney General Daniel Cabeza de Vaca.
Among the victims of the U.S-trained Zetas have been other suspected smugglers, hit men, police, soldiers and civilians on both sides of the 2,000-mile border.
There are widespread reports of the commandos making cross-border runs into U.S. territory in military-style vehicles, armed with automatic weapons.
The U.S. government spent millions of dollars training Los Zetas to intercept drugs, some of them coming from Mexico's southern border, before they could reach the U.S. The U.S. government has also sent U.S. Border Patrol agents to Mexico's southern border with Guatemala to train law enforcement and military forces to intercept human smugglers destined to reach the U.S.
Guzman, whose nickname means "Shorty," bribed guards to escape from prison in 2001. He is one of Mexico's most-wanted fugitives. U.S. authorities have offered a $5 million reward for his capture.
The spike in killings and kidnappings in northern Mexico in recent months has made headlines and prompted federal agents and soldiers to patrol the streets of Nuevo Laredo, across from Laredo, Texas. Recently, a new police chief in Nuevo Laredo was assassinated nine hours after taking office.
Among the 600 people murdered in gang shootings across the Mexican border this year, many were slain execution-style, with their hands tied behind their backs.
The violence along the border has reached a point where some are questioning President Vicente Fox's ability to govern the country.
A senior U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration official, Anthony Placido, told Congress last week that Mexico's corrupt police forces were "all too often part of the problem rather than part of the solution" in fighting the drug cartels.
Fox won office in 2000, ending 71 years of one-party rule and promising to clamp down on the multibillion-dollar cross-border trade in cocaine, marijuana and heroin.
While initially winning praise for putting bosses like Benjamin Arellano Felix and Osiel Cardenas behind bars, his crime-busting reputation has been undermined by the alarming rise in violence, along with evidence Fox has failed to clean up Mexico's police forces.
Faced with the fallout on its southern frontier, the State Department has twice issued travel warnings for the Mexican border, where more than 30 U.S. citizens have been kidnapped.
Mexico's apparent inability to curb the bloodshed on the 2,000-mile border is affecting the financial markets. Banking group HSBC said "staggering" levels of violence could raise questions about Mexico's stability in the run-up to next year's presidential election. Fox is constitutionally barred from running for re-election.
His approval rating has taken a hit, dropping 3 points to 56 percent in a poll in May, with many Mexicans complaining of safety fears, particularly in the north.
Fox has pledged a "mother of all battles" against the drug traffickers he says are openly challenging the government.
"We have taken on the challenge and we will do battle against all the cartels' criminals and against organized crime," Fox said in a speech Friday.
He sent hundreds of troops and federal agents to the states of Tamaulipas, Sinaloa and Baja California last week after suspected drug hit men killed the police chief of Nuevo Laredo.
Despite the move, drug gangs shot and killed at least 11 people across the three states during the week, prompting observers to declare the operation, dubbed "Mexico Secure," a failure.
G32: "whine whine whine"
LOL! Couldn't have made the case any better myself! Great, uh, logical refutation there G32. That should convince a lot of neutrals on the subject!
There's not going to be a lot of neutrals on this subject. You have the users and nonusers. Period.
And many nonusers, like me, support legalization. If opponents have no actual arguments to present to liberty-loving nonusers, legalization will eventually come to pass.
But the Minute Men are the bad guys per the MSM.
No, there are users and nonusers. Period. The legalization argument lines up perfectly with those.
Not all that silly, since there pretty much is no more usa, one can think of the former usa and mexico all being one big chunk of territory controlled by a ruling oligarchy. So you are forgiven.
Wrong ... many nonusers, like me, support legalization. (Do you think every opponent of Prohibition was a drinker?)
As if I'm going to believe anything you say?
I don't care what you believe; if all you bring to the forum of public debate is "I don't believe you", then you lose.
C'mon. Former Secretary of State George Schultz is a well known pot-head.
. . .Where I can see that coming into play will be the higher cost of getting insurance for those who are at risk by their own behavior.
I know this will sound cold-hearted, but the dredges, the drug users, HIV carriers, etc. ought to be allowed to just, well, die if they harm themselves that badly.
Why should the taxpayer be made to pay for someone else's bad behavior? Medical Care for dead beats is another problem forced on us by the Nanny State, one which I highly disapprove.
While it may be a stretch to say there are 'responsible' drug users, there are responsible drinkers, so it would be reasonable to believe they exist. The Nanny State MUST be stopped..if it were, we would not NEED a War on Drugs, because all the problems would solve themselves..in a way.
You came over from DU just to throw seeds, didn't you? Seeds of dissent and disruption.
I am a nonuser. You do know that libel and slander are crimes?
No it doesn't, Iam a non-users and over the years I have concluded that the WOD is one of the worst policies ever adopted by the usa, the government abuses, lost lives and monies, all compell me to believe that drugs should be uncriminalized and taxed. If you want to ruin your life with drugs then go for it. The lost cause of trying to save your sorry butt is not worth my cost in bigger more abusive government.
The key word here is where my taxes go..I dont want them going to the war on drugs. Consider the Mexican Border, Agents want to stop drug shipments, get a handle on cartels..so they ignore the "benign illegal just looking for work". The war on drugs gives our government a reason to NOT take care of the illegal invasion.
Spend the money on the "WAR ON ANY ILLEGAL ENTRY, FOR ANY REASON, and I wont mind my tax dollars going to it!
You are punishing me aren't you? You say I am forgiven, yet you remind me of the "Unification of the Americas". . . Bad Squishy! ;>)
That, unlike the War On Drugs, is a proper function of government.
Why? (And under your rule, would opium be legal?)
Seriously, go over to their drug threads. You'd fit right in...
Do you even know that drug legalization is a liberal cause?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.