Deception's damning documents -Downing Memos Still Exist!

Boston Globe ^ | 6/21/05 | Paul Rogat Loeb

[Tumbleweed_Connection]

Crazy frootloops

[Pyro7480]

Where's the BARF alert!?

[NeoCaveman]

I couldn't get past the first sentence written by this barking moonbat.

[longtermmemmory]

fake but accurate

The left (the boston "GLOB") is petrified the memos are fake story will gain legs BEFORE the hearings end.

Once they have their "dubin" moment, it does not matter if the documents are shown as fake. Al jazeera will have their propaganda.

The fact that the Boston Globe refuses to accept or do any investigation into the validity of the docs is BEYOND disgusting, BEYOND YELLOW JOURNALISM, is is borderline treason.


Perhaps the reporter needs a vacation at Club Gitmo.

[kevkrom]

Ok... so despite the fact that there's 1) no way to verify the memos are legit, and 2) nothing really damning in them anyway, this Boston Globe idiot still thinks they're relevant?

[COEXERJ145]

Barking Moonbat Alert!

[NewMediaFan]

The Globe is still pissed off that homeboy Kerry lost.

[advance_copy]

Hey Loeb, your "damning documents" are fake.

This transcript of a July 23, 2002, British prime minister's meeting...

No, it's not a transcript of the meeting, it's what British reporter Michael Smith CLAIMS are a transcript of the meeting. He re-typed the minutes and destroyed the original minutes claiming he was protecting the source.

[Bahbah]

"coalition of the willing" meant the United States, Britain, and the equivalent of a child's imaginary friends.

Please tell that to the soldiers from other countries who incurred "imaginary" deaths and injuries.

[Question_Assumptions]

If this twit was paying attention rather than grinding his political axe, he'd realize that the UK and UK continued to bomb Iraq fairly heavily throughout the 1990s (while a certain favored Democrat was president) to damage it's ability to defend itself against air attacks. Why no complaints about what Clinton and Blair did throughout the 1990s rather than just the focus on Bush and Blair (let's not forget him)?

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Conyers holding hearings? There went the author's credibility - down the "Toilet Bowl of Love."

[saleman]

"I follow Iraq pretty closely, but was taken aback when Charlie Clements, now head of the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, described driving in Iraq months before the war ''and a building would just explode, hit by a missile from 30,000 feet."

WTF? Would someone please google the "Unitarian Universalist whatever"? I have a feeling Charlie Clements may be a Nut.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Discussion about the validity of the memo here:

Key To Downing Street Fakes? (Can I Be Famous Like Buckhead?)

[roses of sharon]

I find it remarkable that everything this political document talks about, I have heard for a decade!

The US and Britain have been hashing over this quandary since Saddam decided not to live up to his surrender agreement to prove on paper that he destroyed his WMD.

Do we trust Saddam and Sons to not make and use WMD in the future, after the so-called "containment" was lifted? Or do we just take him out, (regime change under Clinton), or do we use the UN, ie, the failure to disclose WMD destruction or whereabouts?

But, for most liberals history begins when they wake up in the morning.

[Josh Painter]

"With congressman John Conyers holding hearings..."

Bugus hearings (on bogus documents) "chaired" by the biggest socialist in congress. "Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

[eyespysomething]

With congressman John Conyers holding fake hearings,

[eureka!]

"Crazy frootloops"

and Coo Coo for Cocoa Puffs. What a bunch of losers. The best news: They got until January 2009 to whine and dream of impeachment. All the while, W will keep on going. Hehehehe....

[kromike]

Speaking of which, have you noticed just how quiet Kerry got after his big June 2nd announcement where he was going to raise this with Congress, blah blah blah.

Just like Dean running his mouth, I want liberals everywhere to just keep on wasting their time, money & energy chasing ghosts & ghostwriters. As far as political enemies go, these people may be numerous but they're just not very bright.

[romanesq]

I don't think the information is fake. I saw the journalist and he said it was the legal folks who instructed on all that stuff.

The real issue is that the information shows concern about the use of WMDs.

That's the loudest message in it I hear. Everything else is just about the theory on what might lead to a conflict.

[OldFriend]

Good grief. All the evidence presented to President Bush was handed down by slick willie and his hand picked FBI and CIA heads.