Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New model 'permits time travel'
BBC ^ | 6/17/05 | Julianna Kettlewell

Posted on 06/17/2005 12:06:22 PM PDT by LibWhacker

If you went back in time and met your teenage parents, you could not split them up and prevent your birth - even if you wanted to, a new quantum model has stated.

Researchers speculate that time travel can occur within a kind of feedback loop where backwards movement is possible, but only in a way that is "complementary" to the present.

In other words, you can pop back in time and have a look around, but you cannot do anything that will alter the present you left behind.

The new model, which uses the laws of quantum mechanics, gets rid of the famous paradox surrounding time travel.

Paradox explained

Although the laws of physics seem to permit temporal gymnastics, the concept is laden with uncomfortable contradictions.

The main headache stems from the idea that if you went back in time you could, theoretically, do something to change the present; and that possibility messes up the whole theory of time travel.

Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

So either time travel is not possible, or something is actually acting to prevent any backward movement from changing the present.

For most of us, the former option might seem most likely, but Einstein's general theory of relativity leads some physicists to suspect the latter.

According to Einstein, space-time can curve back on itself, theoretically allowing travellers to double back and meet younger versions of themselves.

And now a team of physicists from the US and Austria says this situation can only be the case if there are physical constraints acting to protect the present from changes in the past.

Weird laws

The researchers say these constraints exist because of the weird laws of quantum mechanics even though, traditionally, they don't account for a backwards movement in time.

Quantum behaviour is governed by probabilities. Before something has actually been observed, there are a number of possibilities regarding its state. But once its state has been measured those possibilities shrink to one - uncertainty is eliminated.

So, if you know the present, you cannot change it. If, for example, you know your father is alive today, the laws of the quantum universe state that there is no possibility of him being killed in the past.

It is as if, in some strange way, the present takes account of all the possible routes back into the past and, because your father is certainly alive, none of the routes back can possibly lead to his death.

"Quantum mechanics distinguishes between something that might happen and something that did happen," Professor Dan Greenberger, of the City University of New York, US, told the BBC News website.

"If we don't know your father is alive right now - if there is only a 90% chance that he is alive right now, then there is a chance that you can go back and kill him.

"But if you know he is alive, there is no chance you can kill him."

In other words, even if you take a trip back in time with the specific intention of killing your father, so long as you know he is happily sitting in his chair when you leave him in the present, you can be sure that something will prevent you from murdering him in the past. It is as if it has already happened.

"You go back to kill your father, but you'd arrive after he'd left the room, you wouldn't find him, or you'd change your mind," said Professor Greenberger.

"You wouldn't be able to kill him because the very fact that he is alive today is going to conspire against you so that you'll never end up taking that path leads you to killing him."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mechanics; model; paradox; quantum; stringtheory; theory; time; timetravel; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: LibWhacker
New model 'permits time travel'

Kewl. Does this mean I can travel back in time to 1980, to the night I met my ex-wife, and yell at myself "RUN, YOU IDIOT! RUN!"

41 posted on 06/17/2005 12:27:32 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

"Any reliance on SciFi writting is laughable to the point of being ignored."

You're being a bit over-serious, to the point of dour, here. The author's reference was tongue-in-cheek, specifically due to the science fiction popularized in books and film.


42 posted on 06/17/2005 12:28:57 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Time travel is possible, but not probable since you would have to move your mass backwards or forward to the point that the Earth was in during the time period you wish to visit and then back to the point and time of origin.

The Earth and solar system are moving thru space at about 13 miles per second(IIRC) around the hub of the galaxy which is also moving thru space at an even faster speed. The positional calculations alone are a real bear, and when you look at the energy requirements, and that you have to take that energy supply and a computer, with you to get back, it gets unsurmountable real fast.

For those and other reasons we won't be time traveling anytime soon, if ever.

I just wish I could send a small piece of paper backwards to myself, about 30 minutes, with 6 numbers on it.

43 posted on 06/17/2005 12:29:49 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

"You can't travel into the past. You can only travel into the future."

Then the big question is "can you get back?"


44 posted on 06/17/2005 12:30:00 PM PDT by Frank L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"You go back to kill your father, but you'd arrive after he'd left the room, you wouldn't find him, or you'd change your mind," said Professor Greenberger.

"You wouldn't be able to kill him because the very fact that he is alive today is going to conspire against you so that you'll never end up taking that path leads you to killing him."

Well! So much for my plans for father's day!

(ducking)

45 posted on 06/17/2005 12:30:18 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I just wish they'd get around to Stalin, Mao and Hitler!

Maybe they weren't trying to fix things but they just got worse each time they tried and that's why we got Stalin, Mao and Hitler...
46 posted on 06/17/2005 12:31:00 PM PDT by Ragnorak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

"Then there's that aforementioned predetermination argument. Am I really making choices, or do I only think I'm making choices?"

If you think you're making choices, then you are. That your choices were known beforehand changes nothing.


47 posted on 06/17/2005 12:33:05 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

You could, but your wealth today has already been set. You would not be richer than before you went back to the past in order to alter the present (which then was in the future).

But, you could travel to the *future* and buy a copy of the Wall Street Journal, travel back to the present and invest wisely. Since you travelled to the future and now know with certainty what will happen, quantum mechanics says that the future, now, cannot be altered. Just make sure you do not meet yourself, else your future will also be already determined.

Now where's that Tylenol.


48 posted on 06/17/2005 12:34:23 PM PDT by junaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

"you would have to move your mass backwards"

Bass mackwards? "Hey YOU!!! Move your mass!!!" LOL.


49 posted on 06/17/2005 12:34:39 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Wasn't this the theory used in the most recent movie "The Time Machine".

The guy creates a machine to go back in time to prevent his fiancee from dying, but she keeps getting killed, in different ways, EVERY TIME.

Turns out, the only reason he created the machine was because of her death. His existence in the past meant that SHE HAD TO DIE. Very clever.


50 posted on 06/17/2005 12:35:05 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
So, if you know the present, you cannot change it. If, for example, you know your father is alive today, the laws of the quantum universe state that there is no possibility of him being killed in the past.

So it is impossible to change anything. But then by simply going into the past you would be changing something, the air you breathe ?

You guys are kidding, right ?

51 posted on 06/17/2005 12:35:06 PM PDT by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"You wouldn't be able to kill him because the very fact that he is alive today is going to conspire against you so that you'll never end up taking that path leads you to killing him."

Say what? What a stupid article.

52 posted on 06/17/2005 12:35:46 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: junaid

"Since you travelled to the future and now know with certainty what will happen, quantum mechanics says that the future, now, cannot be altered."

Careful, the quantum cyber-harpies might swoop down and call you a Luddite idion, LOL. Or would that be a neo-Luddite?


53 posted on 06/17/2005 12:36:23 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SengirV
The point is that people wouldn't suddenly diappear in front of you if their grandparents were killed before their parents were born. They would simple not even exist in your memory to begin with, since they never would have existed.

This is apparently related to the laws of genetics, to wit: If your grandparents never had children, neither will you.

54 posted on 06/17/2005 12:37:32 PM PDT by Erasmus ("The best-laid men gang oft a-gley." --Robt. Burns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Frank L
Then the big question is "can you get back?"

If you could find a way to generate 1.21 gigawatts of electricity. And have a DeLorean.

55 posted on 06/17/2005 12:37:58 PM PDT by dfwgator (Flush Newsweek!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"I guess I did steal my dad's keys" - Ted Theodore Logan
56 posted on 06/17/2005 12:38:02 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
You can only travel into the future.

I travel into the future all the time. One second at a time.

57 posted on 06/17/2005 12:38:23 PM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

"idion"

That would be idiot, idiot.


58 posted on 06/17/2005 12:38:31 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Hmmm... I still don't understand; If someone went back and killed Marx's grandparents, Marx's contemporaries wouldn't suddenly see him "fade into the ether." He just simply would never have existed for them. And we here in the 21st century wouldn't be aware that anything amiss had happened either. In fact, couldn't time travelers be traveling backward in time constantly killing people whose offspring they don't like -- thereby instantly wiping out our memories of those people and anything they might have accomplished during their lifetimes?I just wish they'd get around to Stalin, Mao and Hitler!

Just to be fair, they did kill Zarquon, Lifnerd, and Bullawayo -- and they were far worse.

59 posted on 06/17/2005 12:39:34 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tatze

"I travel into the future all the time. One second at a time."

Well, no. You're riding on the back of a now, which has always marched forward.


60 posted on 06/17/2005 12:40:48 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson