Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media ignores Durbin comments, focuses on baseball players comments about homosexuality
NBCSports.com news service ^ | 6/15/05 | NBC sports

Posted on 06/16/2005 10:16:41 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky

Report: Everett rips gays, fans, Wrigley

Chicago White Sox designated hitter Carl Everett has made more headlines for his controversial behavior and quotes than his play.

NBCSports.com news services

Updated: 9:20 a.m. ET June 16, 2005

Chicago White Sox designated hitter Carl Everett criticized gays, fans, Wrigley Field and other targets during an interview for the July edition of Maxim magazine, the Chicago Tribune said.

About homosexuals, Everett said "Gays? Being gay is wrong. Two women can't produce a baby, two men can't produce a baby, so it's not how it's supposed to be. ... I don't believe in gay marriages. I don't believe in being gay."

Everett has been one of baseball's more controversial players, most notoriously known for his confrontation with umpire Ron Kulpa in 2000 while playing for the Boston Red Sox.

The White Sox DH also ripped on baseball fans, saying that "Fan is short for fanatic — he's crazy about something he really doesn't know about. And it's proven that 99 percent of baseball fans have no idea what they're watching."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carleverett; durbin; liberalmedia; mediabias; newsblackout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Ol' Sparky

I don't think the Democrats realize how risky it is for their party to play the Gitmo card. Their party is already considered "soft" on crime. Now they're giving themselves the reputation of also being soft on terrorism.


21 posted on 06/16/2005 11:38:02 AM PDT by Califelephant (The Democrat Party: Soft on Crime, Soft on Terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
They're going to Rocker-ize Everett because they know they can.

Fortunately for Everett, he's black and that will allow him to escape the same condemnation that Rocker received.

22 posted on 06/16/2005 11:38:52 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
They're going to Rocker-ize Everett because they know they can.

That's my take also.

23 posted on 06/16/2005 12:20:09 PM PDT by Doomonyou (I don't think so, Scooter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
They're going to Rocker-ize Everett because they know they can.

That's my take also.

24 posted on 06/16/2005 12:21:25 PM PDT by Doomonyou (I don't think so, Scooter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Then they'll "Tyson-ize" him. They both have said a few things that make you wonder what planet they come from.


25 posted on 06/16/2005 12:26:29 PM PDT by ssaftler (Screw politics, it's baseball season!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

You don't think a White Sox is not watching out for the Twins? They are five games back and I am very worried still. So far this year we are handling them though and we clearly have much better pitching than anyone in the league but that may not be enough to keep us out front.


26 posted on 06/16/2005 12:32:00 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
The MSM are crazed and upset anytime a Chicago team is in 1st place.

With luck, my Twins will take care of that pretty soon.

27 posted on 06/16/2005 12:47:01 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Ah, spring. Such as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
With luck, my Twins will take care of that pretty soon.

Lets hope not. :D

28 posted on 06/16/2005 12:54:27 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Let's agree to disagree. :) LOL


29 posted on 06/16/2005 1:07:17 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Ah, spring. Such as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

alright. :D


30 posted on 06/16/2005 1:09:42 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Califelephant
Now they're giving themselves the reputation of also being soft on terrorism.

Soft on terrorism? Quite the contrary. The Democrats seem to have a virtual hard-on for terrorism.

31 posted on 06/16/2005 4:46:20 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson