Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold (MO) is considering cameras as traffic cops
STLToday.com ^ | 6/15/2005 | Matthew Hathaway

Posted on 06/16/2005 7:57:31 AM PDT by scott7278

If you run a red light in Arnold, you could get a ticket, even if you don't get pulled over by a police officer.

The City Council is expected to vote tonight on a proposal to install cameras at the city's busiest traffic intersections. Car owners will be issued citations in the mail, even if they weren't the ones driving.

To issue a ticket under the plan, the camera would have to capture high-resolution images of the car license plate and the signal clearly shining red. The proposed ordinance says people inside the vehicle - including the driver - will not be photographed. Whoever the vehicle is registered to would be ticketed, unless that person can prove someone else was driving. Scofflaws would be fined $94.50, the same as if they were ticketed the old-fashioned way.

If council members approve the plan - and the city's mayor believes they will - Arnold will be the first community in the St. Louis area to install the so-called red-light cameras.

Elsewhere, the cameras have met with mixed reaction and even accusations that cities have changed the timing of some signals to reap extra revenue.

Arnold Mayor Mark Powell says he expects the cameras to pay for themselves, but he says safety is the city's motivation. He said the city initially would install cameras at two busy intersections - Jeffco Boulevard and Highway 141 and Richardson and Vogel roads - and atop a traffic light near Rockport Heights Elementary School.

Powell said the city isn't trying to invade privacy, and it doesn't plan to crack down on drivers who barely run a red light.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; greed; iwantyourmoney; roadtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
It’s for the ChildrenTM
1 posted on 06/16/2005 7:57:32 AM PDT by scott7278
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scott7278
Car owners will be issued citations in the mail, even if they weren't the ones driving.

That'll work.

</sarcasm>

2 posted on 06/16/2005 7:58:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

Big Brother is everywhere.....


3 posted on 06/16/2005 7:59:17 AM PDT by colorcountry (Um....I got nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Whoever the vehicle is registered to would be ticketed, unless that person can prove someone else was driving.

This will work, too.

4 posted on 06/16/2005 7:59:53 AM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A new revenue stream. Show me the money!


5 posted on 06/16/2005 7:59:56 AM PDT by demlosers (Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
Powell said the city isn't trying to invade privacy, and it doesn't plan to crack down on drivers who barely run a red light.

All you have to do to keep people from running red lights is to make the yellow a reasonable length of time.

Cities that used these to generate revenue found they could generate a lot more revenue by shortening the yellow by half a second.

6 posted on 06/16/2005 8:00:26 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
This will work, too.

So much for presumption of innocence.

7 posted on 06/16/2005 8:01:03 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

as long as we know about in advance, why have a problem with it? Either don't run the red light or cover your tag.


8 posted on 06/16/2005 8:01:14 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Nothing Arnold, MO does surprises me. They loved having the MODOT work zones on the highway a few years ago -- nice little revenue stream for them even when there were no workers around.


9 posted on 06/16/2005 8:01:56 AM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Yep. Do you have to go to the Ministry of Justice to dispute it?


10 posted on 06/16/2005 8:02:38 AM PDT by Millee (So you're a feminist......isn't that cute??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

I will say this, traffic cops are USELESS. In the midsize city where I live they are usually on their cell phone.


11 posted on 06/16/2005 8:03:34 AM PDT by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
Traffic cameras are not needed if the yellow light duration is adequate for the distance to be traveled through the intersection.

You can think of this by imagining a four-way intersection where a car making a left hand turn has to travel 150 feet to pass through the intersection. If the yellow light is set at 5 or 6 seconds the car has sufficient time to pass through the intersection before the light turns red.

By reducing the yellow light duration to three seconds it now becomes difficult for the car to safely travel through the intersection before the light turns red.

After some time drivers will adapt to this be either running the red light or performing an emergency stop which can cause them to be rear-ended by the car, SUV, or truck behind them.

In a legal sense, is the city of Arnold liable for any injuries or damages caused by an accident because the yellow light duration, which was determined to maximize revenue, has created an unsafe condition?

12 posted on 06/16/2005 8:04:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So much for presumption of innocence.

Yep. The burden of proving innocence is on the accused. Any thoughts about where that will lead in the future?

13 posted on 06/16/2005 8:05:23 AM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

Why not just tell the city council that anyone who votes for this crap will be drummed out of office, and mean it? Years ago, some town in Texas tried using a system called Orbis, and the townspeople spelled it out for the BB wannabes. The pols repented of it.


14 posted on 06/16/2005 8:05:30 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

I'm coming to read your mail in a week. You have ample warning.


15 posted on 06/16/2005 8:06:08 AM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
"This will work, too."

You are guilty until proven innocent, comrade.
16 posted on 06/16/2005 8:08:12 AM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

My daughter just moved from Arnold in February. I thought it was a quaint "red-neck" sort of town, and it felt much like home (rural Utah).

But then again, Salt Lake City has cameras at all major intersections. I'm not sure what they're watching for, but I make sure to pick my nose when I stop at a red light, just to entertain them.


17 posted on 06/16/2005 8:09:22 AM PDT by colorcountry (Um....I got nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
"The burden of proving innocence is on the accused. Any thoughts about where that will lead in the future?"

Celebrities and the rich go free; the rest of us go to jail.

Oh, wait...
18 posted on 06/16/2005 8:10:21 AM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
Celebrities and the rich go free; the rest of us go to jail.

Oh, wait...

True, true.

19 posted on 06/16/2005 8:11:45 AM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

Big market for stolen license plates


20 posted on 06/16/2005 8:12:22 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson