Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I agree with the senator that says 'some of them should be executed' - let's do it and do it now. examples need to be set.
1 posted on 06/15/2005 3:35:00 PM PDT by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: AgThorn
RushLimbaugh.com

The Club G'itmo T-Shirt - My Mullah went to Club G'itmo and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt


2 posted on 06/15/2005 3:38:00 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Look! Jimmy Carter! History's greatest monster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

Well, if we decide we can't hold them forever, and they need to be tried, it seems to me that the appropriate thing to do is to give them full due process rights and full-dress criminal trials under the law...of the place they committed their crimes. Which is to say, the republics of Afghanistan and of Iraq, both functioning democracies with legal systems, should be eventually given full custody of these prisoners along with their legal dossiers, to give them appropriate trials. That would, after all, be full due process as required under international law.


3 posted on 06/15/2005 3:38:45 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

We should hold them on a Navy ship about 500 miles from shore. We can't help it if they tried to escape by jumping overboard in the dark of night.


4 posted on 06/15/2005 3:39:07 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid! (ours, not theirs!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

fine with me.

they probably eat better at gitmo than they do at home,

and they probably eat better than sheriff arpaio's inmates in phoenix.


5 posted on 06/15/2005 3:39:59 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

This whole Guantanamo thing burns my buns a bit.

On the one side I agree with the left in that we need to do something ... but I do not agree with what nonsense they say, i.e. 'close the base', 'it's an embarassment', etc.

What moron wants to release these terrorists? Especially knowing what the results of the 'experiment' (I would think it should be called) of when the last '4' that were released, i.e. their showing up to fight our soldiers as soon as they could.

WHY don't we set up a tribunal and trial on each prisoner? It is idiotic to try to hold these creeps till the 'end of the war' or whatever, as there may never be an end of this war. Did we hold the spys we caught till the end of the 'cold war'? No, we tried, convicted and sentenced them. Why is this any different for this 'war on terror' that will probably last as long or longer as the cold war?

In fact, it will last longer precicely because we are NOT doing anything with the prisoners except giving them club med treatment. Who can say that the four that were released and were back fighting our soldiers didn't do it with the hope of getting a trip back to Guantanamo because of all the great accomodations!! ;-)

Enough!!! Set up the tribunal and start to convict, sentence and hopefully have some summary executions and make them public. This war on terror has to quit being so politically correct and start being serious!!! Off with their heads!!


6 posted on 06/15/2005 3:41:50 PM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
Republican senators called on Wednesday for the rights of foreign terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay prison to be legally defined even as the Bush administration said the inmates could be jailed there "in perpetuity."

What counties do these "foreign terrorism suspects" originate from?

8 posted on 06/15/2005 3:42:43 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

Terrorist rights defined:

"None"


Next.


11 posted on 06/15/2005 3:44:43 PM PDT by thoughtomator (The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

This is an excellent idea. Shoot the rest too.


12 posted on 06/15/2005 3:44:43 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Delenda est Liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
"Guantanamo Bay is an international embarrassment to our nation, to our ideals, and it remains a festering threat to our security," Leahy said.

Substitute the following words "Guantanamo Bay", "it", and replace with "Leahy".

13 posted on 06/15/2005 3:44:49 PM PDT by afnamvet (31st Fighter Wing Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 "Return with Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

True-believing islamonazis don't fear death so much. They DO however, fear being incarcerated for the rest of their natural lives. In addition, they are more susceptible to interrogation when kept long enough. Gitmo is a smart move that proves the current Administration understands the mind of the enemy. The leftist politicians are once again proving themselves weak on defense and strong on criticizing America.


15 posted on 06/15/2005 3:45:23 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reg45; Dark Wing; Dog Gone; NJ_gent

ping


18 posted on 06/15/2005 3:49:44 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

I think they'd start smelling bad after 40-60 years.


19 posted on 06/15/2005 3:51:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

Ha!, Biden and Leahy think Gitmo is bad for terrorists. I'm actually looking forward to the day we can incarcerate in perpetuity traitors who happen to be serving in either house of congress, or who are working in the MSM. I'm sure the day is coming. We can't win the war until it does.


23 posted on 06/15/2005 3:54:14 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
Murderers traditionally in liberal states get life in prison in many states the prisons are a hell of a lot tougher than Gitmo...and not on a tropical beach.

Last I heard all these Moozelum terrorists were going to commit Holy Suicide?

Guess they really must be enjoying their stay among the infidels ..but then who wants to go back to snowy winters in A-Stan when you can winter in Gitmo and eyeball the pretty infidel female attendants

24 posted on 06/15/2005 3:55:15 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
Maybe they should ask the former residents of the "Hanoi Hilton" about legal rights of detainees. Only they weren't detainees they were legitimate POWs under the GHC and they WERE tortured methodically.

Any Freeper Veteran here can tell the Sens that what we went through at the Draft induction center and in basic training was far-far worse than what the "detainees" at Club Cuba's Gourmand Gitmo Cafe are undergoing.
25 posted on 06/15/2005 3:56:45 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

Agreed.


26 posted on 06/15/2005 3:57:00 PM PDT by TheDon (Euthanasia is an atrocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
Bush administration said the inmates could be jailed there "in perpetuity."

Inmates.

Inmates? How about caged murderous beasts.

Oh, btw, the Geneva Accords don't apply either.


28 posted on 06/15/2005 3:59:42 PM PDT by glock rocks ( There are not enough liberals in Utah to bother to appease. - Warren Keuffel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn

If we had dealt with these folks the old fashioned way - on the field of battle - there wouldn't be a need for Gitmo in the first place.

But accepting the need for a facility for extracting intelligence from captures combatants who are not covered byt the Geneva COnventions, I'd suggest a top secret facility at an extremely remote location with virtually NO chance of accidental discovery, and there individuals could be treated with all the civility they deserve for as long or short a time as may be required.


31 posted on 06/15/2005 4:03:02 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth; Howlin

Are you watching Hardball??


34 posted on 06/15/2005 4:04:14 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AgThorn
"Critics have decried the indefinite detention of Guantanamo prisoners, whom the United States has denied rights accorded under the Geneva Conventions to prisoners of war."

If they aren't captured wearing recognized military uniforms, fighting for a recognized beligerent nation, then the Geneva Convention gives them *no* rights. Ever.

They can be shot on sight as spies or sabotuers, legally. Anything less is American charity.

38 posted on 06/15/2005 4:08:07 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson