Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jackson breaks silence following acquittal by thanking fans
Yahoo! News ^ | June 14, 2005 | AFP

Posted on 06/14/2005 2:23:08 PM PDT by El Conservador

LOS ANGELES (AFP) - In his first public statement since his acquittal on child sex charges, Michael Jackson thanked his fans for their support and love during his gruelling four-month trial.

"Thank you to my family, friends and fans for all your love and support," read a statement that flashed up for barely a second on the star's website. "I will never forget I love you all. Michael," the message said.

The brief personal statement marked the first public words from the "King of Pop" since a jury on Monday found him not guilty on 10 charges that could have seen him jailed for up to two decades.

The message flashed up under the banner "VICTORY" at the end of an animated display celebrating the superstar's freedom and his winning the battle against the charges against him.

The jury in the California town of Santa Maria, near Neverland Ranch where the star was Tuesday holed up with his family, found Jackson was innocent of abusing a 13-year-old cancer patient, plying the boy with alcohol and plotting to kidnap him and his family.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: jacko; michaeljackson; wackojacko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Is he going to look for the real pedophile???
1 posted on 06/14/2005 2:23:08 PM PDT by El Conservador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

Just one word---blech!!!!


2 posted on 06/14/2005 2:24:06 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

FUNNY!!

all I can say is Bleckkkkkkk


3 posted on 06/14/2005 2:24:47 PM PDT by motormouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

...and I promise never to have another kid sleep with me in my bed.

Is a futon considered a bed?


4 posted on 06/14/2005 2:25:19 PM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

Neverland Raunch.


5 posted on 06/14/2005 2:26:28 PM PDT by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

A public statement.

I guess that's as close to his public he's going to get.

Lay low, Mr. Jackson, lay low. :)


6 posted on 06/14/2005 2:30:40 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Dear Michael,
Please be quiet. You have said enough. Also please do what you said you would and move to another country.

Signed,
Freepers
7 posted on 06/14/2005 2:30:47 PM PDT by PaulaB (Jesus is coming......Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

He should thank the public school system that produced his jury.

Dan


8 posted on 06/14/2005 2:31:43 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jigsaw

Or, Namblaland Ranch.


9 posted on 06/14/2005 2:33:10 PM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

He may be a pedophile. But when your witness has the credibility problems that kid had, and your case is completely dependent on his testimony, it's not too surprising a result, given the reasonable doubt standard.


10 posted on 06/14/2005 2:33:50 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

"...found Jackson was innocent of abusing a 13-year-old cancer patient,..."

I thought he was found Not Guilty. I thought "not guilty" and "innocent" were two different animals? Gee, I feel spun!


11 posted on 06/14/2005 2:34:06 PM PDT by RGVTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
found Jackson was innocent of abusing a 13-year-old cancer patient, plying the boy with alcohol and plotting to kidnap him and his family.

They didn't find him 'innocent'. They found him not guilty. There's a difference.

12 posted on 06/14/2005 2:34:30 PM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been cowboys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormB

What's the definition of "bed?" What's the definition of "sleep?"


13 posted on 06/14/2005 2:34:51 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

Note to Michael Jackson the pedophile: "Not Guilty" doesn't mean "Innocent".


14 posted on 06/14/2005 2:37:06 PM PDT by PilloryHillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormB

"...and I promise never to have another kid sleep with me in my bed. "

...didnt say anything about anyone else's bed!


15 posted on 06/14/2005 2:37:31 PM PDT by Zeppelin (Keep on FReepin' on.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RGVTx

YOU are correct--who ever wrote the story is WRONG---

Jackson is no more innocent than OJ!!!!

I heard on a local radio show that Jackson has been approached about being in the Philadelphia show of the new AIDS Concert....yikes!


16 posted on 06/14/2005 2:38:13 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RGVTx

he was "not found guilty" seems closer to the truth.


17 posted on 06/14/2005 2:40:18 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

You got that right. I watched the jurors this morning on the news shows and there wasn't an articulate one in the bunch. They came across as starstruck by Jackson and very hostile to the mother of the boy. It seemed a personal offense to them the way she did her hair for court. Any book written by this crew will go straight to the remainder bin.


18 posted on 06/14/2005 2:42:21 PM PDT by Sabatier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PaulaB

Move to another country? I thought that was Alec Baldwin and/or Barbra Streisand.

And they're still here too. :)


19 posted on 06/14/2005 2:43:51 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68; Txsleuth

VS, I like your wording. Fits well.

I have noticed several jurors saying how the accuser and his mother are proven liars and that was most influential on their verdict. But, none of them have mentioned that MJ is a proven liar also and that seems to have had no influence upon their verdict. As I recall, MJ lied about his treatment by LEOs during his booking. I think that's a darned serious lie and should have been a big consideration for the jurors. It hasn't even been mentioned by the jurors so I doubt it played any part in their verdict.


20 posted on 06/14/2005 2:51:56 PM PDT by RGVTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson