Posted on 06/13/2005 1:36:46 PM PDT by RWR8189
![]() Per Stig Moeller wants a clear advice on the future of the treaty
|
Danes had been due to take part in a legally binding vote on 27 September, but the re-think follows the French and Dutch rejection of the treaty.
Mr Moeller said he did not expect EU leaders meeting this week to give a clear answer on the fate of the text.
The charter has been ratified by 10 of the 25 member states so far.
EU foreign ministers have been discussing the EU budget and constitution in Luxembourg ahead of the leaders' summit later this week.
Mr Moeller told reporters: "The conversations I had don't convince me we will get a clear answer.
"We want clarity that it is this treaty, nothing more or less, on which we will vote on 27 September, and if there is no clarity on that, because various processes are started which in principle could change it, then you cannot hold a vote."
Opinions turn
Ireland has confirmed plans to hold its referendum on the EU constitution despite the resounding "No" votes in France and the Netherlands.
UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has told the UK Parliament there was "no point" in pursuing plans for a UK referendum after the French and Dutch "No".
Poland and Portugal have said they will stick to their plans to hold referendums on the constitution.
The constitution has to be ratified by all 25 member states to enter into force.
Opinion polls since the French and Dutch "No" votes suggest the Danish public has been turning against the constitution.
A Gallup poll gave the "No" side 38%, against 34% for the "Yes" side. A poll by the same agency in May had the "No" side on 25%, compared with 45% for the "Yes" side.
Denmark rejected the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 but adopted it in a second vote, after winning opt-outs, in 1993. Danes also voted "No" in a 2000 referendum on acceptance of the euro.
The Danes have common sense.
So is this thing a constitution or a treaty...or what? What exactly is the point of this thing? What is different about Europe today than at any other point in history that they now need an all encompassing, er, "consti-treaty-thingie"?
No, they don't or else they wouldn't be letting so many Muslims immigrate.
It is a constitution that is over 200 pages long of legalese single space type covering everything concievable from space program policy to the standardization of egg sizing to the standardizing of the amount of water used when the toilet is flushed.If the rest of Europe weren't such a collection of inbred sheep this creator's blunder would have been laughed down every time it was brought to a vote instead of ratified
Let the people vote, for God's sake.
This is why we had no say in NAFTA, GATT, CAFTA, or the FTAA - the people would voted DOWN this crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.