Skip to comments.
Jury reaches a verdict in the Jackson case. (Update - Not Guilty ALL Counts)
FOXMSNBCCNN
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
Just breaking...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; breakinghard; childmolestation; childmolester; deviancy; deviant; endtimes; freakshow; homo; homosexualagenda; jacko; jackson; jackson5; jacksonfive; jesusjuice; jurynullification; justicedenied; keep; michaeljackson; pedophile; pedophilia; perpwalk; perversion; pervert; perverts; sexabuse; sexualdeviancy; sicko; thriller; wife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,220, 2,221-2,240, 2,241-2,260 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
To: El Gato
I know anyone who can push a stylus can vote in this country, but almost everyone can manage to avoid jury duty. People are thrown off for being too smart or having any familial connections to the law. And the ones who can't get out of jury duty or don't want to are the exact people who worship celebrities.
If Michael Jackson were not famous [even uber-famous], this exact jury would have convicted him of molestation and the alcohol charge, I am 100% certain.
To: All
Did any reporter ask any of the jurors if they would allow MJ to have a sleep over with their children? I think that q would have been an eye opener.
To: somerville
They are truly proud of themselves. At least we now know why they didn't convict Michael. They didn't like the boys Mother?
Not one person on that Jury made a lick of sense.
2,223
posted on
06/13/2005 3:51:46 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: Fudd Fan
Bunch of gigglers who won the lottery.
$$$
2,224
posted on
06/13/2005 3:51:57 PM PDT
by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Dog
2,225
posted on
06/13/2005 3:52:05 PM PDT
by
XR7
To: NautiNurse
VOTE DEMOCRAT!
To: marajade
I'm thinking you're right.
To: cicero's_son
So now it's considered "justice" to be financially ruined by a prosecution that results in a not guilty verdict? Here is the point that is in question. Was there not enough evidence in this case to bring it to trial? Just because you have faith in this jury of "favorable" prosecution elements doesn't make the case that anyone who disagrees with you are reactionary.
But I damn sure am more confident in this jury--which was racially mixed and generally considered "favorable" to the prosecution--than I am in a bunch of people who treated the entire thing as a soap opera.
There are certainly people on this forum that were more concerned with justice than they were with soap opera. The demonstrable fact that MJ has a history of pedophile accusations and his freely admitted preference to sleeping with minors is damning enough to merit scrutiny. If we're to concern ourselves with financial repercussions then we need to consider the fact that it was self-inflicted by MJ in every instance. Neverland??
2,228
posted on
06/13/2005 3:52:21 PM PDT
by
IoCaster
("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
To: Finny
"It's not a stretch at all for me to believe he is, quite simply, child-like in a non-sexual way."
That's kind of like the thought I had earlier, that Jackson's weirdeness worked in his favor. He is so weird that I, too, can imagine him going to bed with boys and not touching them sexually. It doesn't sound good to say it, but NOT touching those boys is weirder than if he had touched them.
To: JeffAtlanta
Uh, maybe because Jackson is a predator and picks on poor kids from bad families that people would never believe?
Just a thought.
To: mikrofon
Probably. I mean after all, OJ was found not guilty because MF used the word nigger in a fictional novel he was writing.
2,231
posted on
06/13/2005 3:52:59 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: Max Flatow
The redhead in the light blue shirt up front is a complete dolt.
To: truthkeeper; Peach
Oop, typo. I meant "she asked for it." Duh!
2,233
posted on
06/13/2005 3:53:06 PM PDT
by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: NautiNurse
Juror back right has bug eyes just like the runaway bride...Just switched to CourtTV. LOL... I'll have to check her out!
2,234
posted on
06/13/2005 3:53:11 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: Max Flatow
One mother said that she wouldn't want to have her child lie to get something...at least, I think that's what the giggler said.
geeze
2,235
posted on
06/13/2005 3:53:14 PM PDT
by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: sofaman
You have made similar and equally ridiculous comments to me previously. When someone disagrees with you, you become personal and that's unnecessary. So I take it you can't back up your blatant lie that I defended Michael Schiavo? If so, you surely would have posted it right here, right?
Just as I said, you're a liar.
To: Howlin
The jurors wanted a "smoking gun" and nothing less than even overwhelming circumstantial evidence. Aside from being in the room, Jackson could have never been found guilty with this jury.
2,237
posted on
06/13/2005 3:53:34 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: kcvl
The mother snapping the fingers at them obviously made them let a pedophile walk! That's not it at all. The mother was in-credible and made them not believe the charges were proved.
To: Howlin
There's no point in trying to have a civil discussion with you. You become insulting and personal. So I have nothing more to say to you.
Buh bye!
To: JCEccles
Prosecutors can't choose the victims. People come in, having been the victim of a crime, and MJ chooses dysfunctional familes carefully..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,220, 2,221-2,240, 2,241-2,260 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson