Skip to comments.
Jury reaches a verdict in the Jackson case. (Update - Not Guilty ALL Counts)
FOXMSNBCCNN
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
Just breaking...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; breakinghard; childmolestation; childmolester; deviancy; deviant; endtimes; freakshow; homo; homosexualagenda; jacko; jackson; jackson5; jacksonfive; jesusjuice; jurynullification; justicedenied; keep; michaeljackson; pedophile; pedophilia; perpwalk; perversion; pervert; perverts; sexabuse; sexualdeviancy; sicko; thriller; wife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,061-2,080, 2,081-2,100, 2,101-2,120 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
To: Howlin; Peach; StarFan; kcvl
Juror #5 seems to be the star here... perhaps she's the one with the book deal. Oh how sweet, they're all gonna hang out as "friends" now... they're a good "support system" for each other...
Dopey guy in hat: Hey, I made 19 new friends out of all this! Yikes...
2,081
posted on
06/13/2005 3:35:46 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: mhking
Hey Snedden, more coffee at table five!
2,082
posted on
06/13/2005 3:35:54 PM PDT
by
investigateworld
( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
To: truthkeeper
Which is why the guilty ask for jury trials, and not a bench trial.
Did you hear the Blake jury? They were vapid too.
Does CA even have a school system?
To: conservativebabe
I sense a big party at Neverland, including one with lots of juror kids coming on...
2,084
posted on
06/13/2005 3:36:01 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: El Gato
Hopefully he'll slip and bugger the child of the PM of Thailand or JapanHow about Singapore?
Anywhere but California. There he has de facto immunity to grope his "rubbas" to his heart's content.
To: mhking
I heard one juror say that it was proven, but not in this case. Do not know what that was in regard to.
To: Howlin
"One already has a book deal."
Really?
To: snarkytart
That old lady has a grandson who is a convicted sex predator. The one who didn't like the mother snapping her fingers at her?!
2,088
posted on
06/13/2005 3:36:16 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Mo1
Yup, that's the important thing... that they all made 19 new friends!
2,089
posted on
06/13/2005 3:36:25 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: Checkers
To: sofaman
MJ still has that library of Beatles songs he owns.
2,091
posted on
06/13/2005 3:36:33 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: nutmeg
To: aynrandfreak
If your case is built directly and exclusively on their testamony alone, then yes it should be a problem. If you have DNA or another witness to establish the charge then it's a different situation.
To: dfwgator
Jacko's weirdness may have worked to his benefit; the jurors might have believed that he was weird enough to have boys in his bed and NOT touch them.
To: Howlin
Yes, we all heard it. The stupid Jury didn't care for the boys Mother...they made fun of her. So that means (I guess) that Michael didn't molest the boy....see???
Would have been easier for them to explain a Guilty verdict than listening to this BS.
2,095
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:09 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: Mo1
Government is basically 100x more incompetent when compared with the private sector. When there is a lot of money to buy the best, they can run rings around the much more restricted prosecutors. Plus proving guilt is tough.
Plus, the motives of the accusers are always suspect especially when there is a time lag between crime and reporting of crime. The accusers mom was apparently a loose cannon who antagonized the jury.
I don't expect that Michael Jackson will be making a comeback. And I hope he changes his ways now.
2,096
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:13 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(Send Bolton to the UN!)
To: Peach
He always will have a friend in Michael, especially if he has a son.
2,097
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:33 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: nutmeg
If I was innocent, I'd want a judge to try my case. If I was guilty, I'd want this jury.
2,098
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:37 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: shellshocked
I agree with you and will share in the beating you are taking. MJ's accusers were grifters and scam-artists. No doubt that MJ is a very strange guy with traits and habits characteristic of a pedophile, but not only were the witnesses against him not trustworthy but the DA did an awful job prosecuting this case and simply did not establish MJ's guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt.
In our system, it is better for the guilty to go free than for the innocent to be convicted. That is the choice the jury had before them.
2,099
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:43 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(Don't You Think This Outlaw Bit's Done Got Out Of Hand?)
To: Peach
I haven't heard ONE single reason why they didn't convict MJ. Not ONE. Neither have I
2,100
posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:47 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,061-2,080, 2,081-2,100, 2,101-2,120 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson