Skip to comments.
Jury reaches a verdict in the Jackson case. (Update - Not Guilty ALL Counts)
FOXMSNBCCNN
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
Just breaking...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; breakinghard; childmolestation; childmolester; deviancy; deviant; endtimes; freakshow; homo; homosexualagenda; jacko; jackson; jackson5; jacksonfive; jesusjuice; jurynullification; justicedenied; keep; michaeljackson; pedophile; pedophilia; perpwalk; perversion; pervert; perverts; sexabuse; sexualdeviancy; sicko; thriller; wife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,560, 1,561-1,580, 1,581-1,600 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
To: All
I am in total shock. Devastated for all the boys he has molested, his sons, and all the boys he will molest in the future.
I don't get this jury at all.
Justice was not served.
To: Howlin
Oh, stuff it Howlin. It will most certainly NOT be on my head, and you should be ashamed of yourself for suggesting such a thing.
To: Dick Vomer
we both thought he was not guilty... i'm not surprised at the verdict...
To: Persistent Shortfalls
The judge could have at least found him guilty of contempt of court...being late. 30 days in jail.
To: MeekOneGOP
1,565
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:15 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: null and void
Just like in "Stripes"
Q: Have you ever been convicted of felony?
A: You mean like, convicted? No, never convicted.
1,566
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:20 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Flush Newsweek!)
To: DameAutour; HairOfTheDog
I agree with both of you. It was a weak case and the accusers were not credible. They were obviously out to make a buck and probably will still hit him up in a civil suit. He's a creepy guy, but that he did what he was accused of doing in this case was not proven to me and it obviously wasn't proven to the jury.
To: NorthWoody
Never, ever, will I, or anyone in my family, set foot in the state of California. I may even cease doing any online shopping with firms located there. OJ walked and now this. Good grief! Shut the state down and board it up. There is nothing there worth anything. (No offense to any Cali-Freepers who may be reading this.) This coming from the home state of Garrison Keillor! ;^)
FWIW, there was actually PHYSICAL EVIDENCE and CREDIBLE WITNESSES in the OJ case, but it was a racial verdict. Maybe unique to California, maybe not. (By the way, you're very much welcome to stay the heck out -- indeed, California has become a liberal nightmare primarily because of out-of-state liberal Midwesterners and Easterners moving in and bringing their politics with them -- us natives and descendents of California pioneers have a long proud history of being Republican to the core).
The OJ case is a bit different from the MJ case, where the accusers were known and established flakes and con-artists and when it comes down to the nitty gritty, there wasn't any concrete proof, just words. Certainly it wasn't enough to convince a Santa Maria jury -- Santa Maria, by the way, is a town I know very well and which is primarily agricultural and conservative. If the jury didn't find him guilty ... it's probably because the evidence wasn't there.
1,568
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:23 PM PDT
by
Finny
(God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
To: MeekOneGOP
yeah....
maybe he will go live with Johnny Depp in France or something....
1,569
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:23 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(10,000 posts by 29 June!!! 9,914 or so replies and counting....Getting Closer!!!!)
To: Cuttnhorse
1,570
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:23 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Oh what a tag lined web we weave...)
To: Howlin
These jurors were not black. Why is race coming into this?
To: pcottraux
And all the child porn seized from his house? Is that enough?I'm sorry, was there any counts of possession of child pornography? I seemed to have missed those. Now the items found at his house would further lead one to believing that MJ is, indeed attracted to young boys. That, in and of itself, does not convict him of molesting this particular boy.
1,572
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:29 PM PDT
by
Texaggie79
(Did I just say that?)
To: b4its2late
Did you see the movie "Alive" or read the book?
To: Lady Jag
1,574
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:31 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: jern
"not a big of moron as the DA"
I don't fault the DA. There was enough evidence to charge the case and bring it to trial. Sometimes you just gotta do what's right, and that DA will be able to sleep at night.
1,575
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:32 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: cicero's_son
Why? You're supporting giving him a license to hunt.
To: roylene
Yet again we find that blacks in this country can murder and molest (whites) with impunity. Never again do I want to hear that being black makes the justis system biased against you.Congratulations. Yours is the widest leap of logic I have ever seen.
To: justche
Teflon Molester!
Too funny - and toooo true!
Just Damn!
1,578
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:42 PM PDT
by
Dashing Dasher
(To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
To: Conservomax
So should gifted. This wierdo creep has no real talent, either.
1,579
posted on
06/13/2005 2:34:53 PM PDT
by
TBP
To: LWalk18
He is black, or didn't you notice?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,560, 1,561-1,580, 1,581-1,600 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson