Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On the “To Do” List for Democrats: Impeach Bush - (Dems dream of reliving "golden age"-Watergate!)
INTELLECTUAL CONSERVATIVE.COM ^ | JUNE 10, 2005 | VINCENT FIORE

Posted on 06/12/2005 8:43:51 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Having lost badly in this new century’s elections, Democrats are now sounding the alarm for impeachment proceedings against President Bush. If the word “impeachment” were not so serious in its intent, one is tempted to laugh out loud, and I will assume that many did.

But this is today’s Democratic Party, where its DNC chairman Howard Dean says that Republicans “never made an honest living in their lives,” the Senate minority leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), calls a sitting president a “loser,” and the House minority leader, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), equated America as a modern-day war machine when she said, “America must be a light to the world, not just a missile.”

So should anyone truly be surprised to hear the “I” word finally make the rounds? The mainstream media have so far held off on any serious coverage, but that may change quickly if the blogosphere has anything to say about it.

The usual muckrakers of the left are in high gear. Websites like the Daily Kos, Democratic Underground, and liberal iconoclast Michael Moore’s website are all salivating over the prospect of doing the one thing that seemingly propels their existence: finally defeating Bush.

To date, the most serious thrusts regarding the impeachment of Bush have come from last year’s presidential losers, Democratic Senator John Kerry and Reform/Green party activist Ralph Nader, who returned from the college talk circuit long enough to post an op-ed in the Boston Globe titled: “The ‘I’ Word.”

In the article, Nader says that “Minutes from a summer 2002 meeting involving British Prime Minister Tony Blair reveal that the Bush administration was ‘fixing’ the intelligence to justify invading Iraq. U.S. intelligence used to justify the war demonstrates repeatedly the truth of the meeting minutes -- evidence was thin and needed fixing.”

These allegations -- or, as Nader would have you read, facts -- are the foundation of an impeachment procedure against Bush, falling into the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Both Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have denied these charges.

Kerry, who is quoted extensively by the anti-American publication, Aljazeera, says “When I go back [to Washington] on Monday, I am going to raise the issue. I think it's a stunning, unbelievably simple and understandable statement of the truth and a profoundly important document that raises stunning issues here at home. And it's amazing to me the way it escaped major media discussion. It's not being missed on the Internet; I can tell you that.”

So, to take stock: Democrats suddenly embrace the Internet as a “news source,” have a notoriously anti-American organ like Aljazeera running Kerry’s impeachment mutterings all over the Middle East, and welcome the 2000 election “spoiler” and pariah, Ralph Nader, back into the family? Read this as throwing it all up against the wall to see what sticks.

Remarkably, the sheer coincidence of disgruntled “Deep Throat” informant, Mark Felt, suddenly announcing to the world that he was the leak in the Nixon White House, leads one to believe that Democrats may be feeling a bit nostalgic about what once was.

For Democrats and the mainstream media, the Watergate era which culminated with the disgrace and removal of Republican President Richard Nixon, was truly the golden era. It was a time of near-political dominance for the Democratic Party, and a media culture that was dedicatedly progressive in its heartfelt ideology, and driven in its desire to create a utopian society through liberal governance.

But that is what today’s liberal Democratic Party is still about. Aside from being the minority party in Washington, the ideology hasn’t changed. Nor have the relics of the Nixonian-era media changed. The liberal media is still here, only now it is no longer the only -- or last -- word regarding politics and world events.

Scandal, for all its negative connotations and mud-wallowing, is still a vital and useful application in politics. Republicans dived into the mud with Bill Clinton, and wound up proving a few scandals along the way. The trick here is that it has to have some truth attached to it.

Democrats have continually tried to drag Bush into the mud these past four years, but found him surprisingly resilient; a Teflon-coated Texan who survived everything from being accused of ignoring warnings of 9/11 (that now-famous August 6, 2001 presidential daily brief, or PDB) to Dan Rather’s infamous attempt at tilting a presidential election through the use of fake National Guard documents -- or as we pajama-clad bloggers call it, “Memogate.”

If the media have their way, they will make a case for impeachment by tying the entire Iraq war, Abu Ghraib, and Guantanamo Bay events together to form the next “something-Gate.” Predictably, Democrats will swallow the bait, along with the hook that will once again trap them into looking like the party of desperation and decline.

The Democratic Party, by its serial promotion of supposed-presidential perfidiousness over any real attempts at legislation, looks more like a party devoid of any ideas, but awash with scandal-clad plots.

Somewhere, Richard Nixon must be smiling; wishing the Democrats of his day were so patently predictable, and so prone to public embarrassment.

Impeachment? No, no. Just another grand “plan” gone awry from our friends on the left. This, too, shall fall short.

Vincent Fiore contributes commentary for several web sites on a weekly basis, and occasionally has commentary posted on NewsMax.com. Your comments are always welcomed.

Comments: VCFkatz@aol.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bitterness; cynicism; democrats; desperatedems; georgewbush; impeachment; leftistagenda; leftistlies; losing; political; president; strategy; tactics

1 posted on 06/12/2005 8:43:52 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Don't forget- this is the 1970s, according to one political theory. It's a 30-year cycle of liberalism (60s), failed liberalism (70s), and reactionary conservatism (80s). A number of things may affect that, but generally we can count on a pretty good decade coming up, something resembling Reagan days.
2 posted on 06/12/2005 8:49:36 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I have a specially modified Corvair that I wish to donate to Nader...


3 posted on 06/12/2005 8:50:46 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Too bad there are plenty on the "right" who are beating the impeachment drums just as loudly.


4 posted on 06/12/2005 8:52:20 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Just Blame President Bush For Everything, It Is Easier Than Using Your Brain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Queerbait, commie lovin RATS have a better plan? Have the chicom $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ arrived yet??


5 posted on 06/12/2005 8:54:30 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Impeachment????

OK you DUmb@sses, let me explain it to you.

The House of Representatives brings articles of impeachment; the Senate tries the case and renders a verdict.

Both Houses of Congress are controlled by Republican Party members, and that is the Party affiliation of the current POTUS.

No matter how much you slobber and drool over the thought of an impeachment of Gee Dubya, it just AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN.

Get over it, or adjust your meds.


6 posted on 06/12/2005 9:03:04 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Let the jacka@@ try, and it will be the end of the Democratic party. Guess they never learn when to accept defeat and learn to shut up.
7 posted on 06/12/2005 9:04:02 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

bump


8 posted on 06/12/2005 9:04:35 PM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Seriously, who???


9 posted on 06/12/2005 9:07:33 PM PDT by stands2reason (It's 2005, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Great article!


10 posted on 06/12/2005 9:23:14 PM PDT by Jenya (Terrorism. Bush gets it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
"Great article!"

Thanks, Jenya. I was really happy that I found this one. It's outstanding. I agree with you!

Char :)

11 posted on 06/12/2005 9:25:47 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: clee1

"House of Representatives brings articles of impeachment"


And this fact may explain part of the reason for the attack on DeLay.


12 posted on 06/12/2005 11:54:47 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; All
Two little words...

President Cheney...

13 posted on 06/13/2005 12:32:48 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Cheney would make a good President, but with his weak heart, he could go while still in office. But that just means we need a strong Vice-President to run with him, just in case.

By the way, I love the above article in the first post.

14 posted on 06/13/2005 12:52:11 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Let the jacka@@ try, and it will be the end of the Democratic party

You're absolutely right. This would be the best thing to ever happen for the Republican party.

Let's hope they bleat as loud and as long as possible. All the way into the '06 election would be perfect. It would be seen as a partisan attempt to defeat a President that they couldn't defeat at the polls. The dems would look like little crybabies fighting over a favorite toy in a sandbox.

The American people won't stand for the Presidency being treated like a toy in a sandbox, by a pack of immature, partisan wolves, and would hand the dems the worst election massacre in history.

15 posted on 06/13/2005 1:00:03 AM PDT by Bullish (Proudly and consistently hating the Clinton's since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson