Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2005 2:29:44 AM PDT by TXBSAFH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TXBSAFH
This almost breaks my heart...

(Is there an HTML tag for sarcasm?)
2 posted on 06/12/2005 2:32:47 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Life's a beach - and Liberals are like the sand that gets in your swimsuit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH
"The major complaint against Sweeney is that he has not stemmed the loss of union members".

Duh, could it be that American workers choose to NOT be a member of a union? The handwriting is on the wall for the dinosauers of the labor movement.

Neither Sweeney nor anyone else can stem the tide of today's modern employees choosing freedom over their local Union Lemming Chapters.

Leni

4 posted on 06/12/2005 2:38:07 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Remember, Half the People You Know are Below Average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

SEIU Executive Board Authorizes Disaffiliation from the AFL-CIO; Follows Resolutions By Local Unions
By unitetowin
Posted on Sat Jun 11, 2005 at 02:14:04 PM EST

Faced with "a fundamental and apparently irreconcilable disagreement" within the labor movement about how to rebuild workers' strength, the SEIU International Executive Board has formally authorized the union's top leadership to disaffiliate from the AFL-CIO if necessary. (Read the full statement by the SEIU Board.)

The Board acted after receiving resolutions from local unions authorizing disaffiliation. The elected rank-and-file executive boards of local unions representing 70 percent of the SEIU membership have already adopted such resolutions, and more have scheduled meetings to consider the issue.

The Board set the following policy of cooperation and partnerships if the union does disaffiliate:

1) "We will seek agreements with other unions to cooperate on strategies to help workers form unions in their core industries or occupations and negotiate better living standards - regardless of whether the cooperating unions are in or out of the AFL-CIO.

2) "We will offer to coordinate with the AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions on political issues important to working families, as we do with the NEA, America Votes, the Sierra Club, the NAACP, Mi Familia Vota, and many other organizations, and we would be prepared to contribute financially to the AFL-CIO political program.

3) "We will work to build powerful and inclusive social movements in our communities through continued participation with Central Labor Councils (CLCs) and State Federations.

4) "We will seek agreements with other unions not to fight over the few workers who are already organized or make deals with employers to lower pay and benefit standards. Our focus will be on helping more workers in our core industries to join unions, and not on dividing workers' strength or wasting workers' precious resources by trying to persuade current union members to change unions."

The SEIU Board - which includes 50 local union leaders whose locals include more than 80 percent of the union's membership - said the union's decisions will continue to be based on three principles:

· "The union movement must focus on uniting with us the 9 out of 10 workers who have no union. Without doing so, we not only cannot build a broad movement for social and economic justice but we can't even win consistently at the bargaining table or in the legislative arena for the small minority of workers who still have a union.

· "Uniting more workers with us requires lead unions in each industry or occupation that have the focus, strategy, and resources to win. We cannot help workers make major advances in each industry as long as the AFL-CIO structure and rules condone and reward union strategies that divide workers' strength in each industry -- 15 separate organizations in the transportation industry, 15 in construction, 13 in public employment, 9 in manufacturing, and so on -- while allowing even more unions to start organizing in those sectors and make a bad situation even worse.

· "We must empower those hit hardest in today's economy, including low-wage women and people of color. That requires two changes. First, we must make it our top priority to help millions in today's diverse workforce to join unions. Second, we must adopt standards and timetables to ensure that our organizations reflect that diversity at every level of leadership and member participation.

While unions that represent a total of 5 million workers have made a proposal for change based on those commitments (see ChangetoWin.org ), the AFL-CIO officers have made their own proposal which does not implement those principles.

"We respect those who disagree with us, and hope to continue to work with them on political and community issues we share," the SEIU Board said. "But there comes a point where if we can't reach agreement on basic principles, we should each move on and devote our time and resources to a strategy we believe will help working people win."


http://www.unitetowinblog.org/


9 posted on 06/12/2005 2:43:53 AM PDT by endthematrix (Thank you US armed forces, for everything you give and have given!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH
Unite Here and the Laborers

Sounds like a band name.
12 posted on 06/12/2005 2:49:35 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH
I am a dues paying UAW union member.

The UAW, in their infinite wisdom, has decided to throw in with the AFL-CIO. As I understand it, the fastest growing unions in the AFL-CIO are the ones that reside in the public sector. So in order to finance one part of their membership, the AFL-CIO has to advocate higher taxes for another of their membership. Robbing Peter to pay Paul?!

What's wrong with this picture?
15 posted on 06/12/2005 2:55:29 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

This isn't really about the AFL-CIO breaking up.

What's really happening is that they are breaking up so that they can reorganize under a new entity.

I'm sure that many are vying for the top spots, but this is just like a corporate restructuring.

The Unite-here leadership is basically trying to take over, but they can't until the pieces of the Afl-cio break off first.


16 posted on 06/12/2005 3:02:48 AM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

I'm melting! I'm melting!


18 posted on 06/12/2005 3:46:10 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH
Its been fun watching the FireFighters association/AFLCIO affiliate send out mailer after mailer claiming to be completely bipartisan.

The facts show donations to be nearly 90% to the democrats year in year out.

21 posted on 06/12/2005 4:01:13 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

It had to happen. The SEIU makes the AFL-CIO look like the DAR, and since it is - in essence - a public teat parasite, the SEIU is probably the future of unions in this country. Their unlimited support of abortion and the homosexual agenda, as well as anti-military causes (not to mention their willingness to work alongside the CPUSA in elections) make them the darlings of the hard left.


23 posted on 06/12/2005 4:32:24 AM PDT by niteowl77 (I see seven senators badly in need of emergency RINOplasty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

Oh boy, what's a democrat to do now? Thier whole world is slowing sinking right in front of their eyes. One of the biggest arms of the democratic party is headed straight to the bottom of the ocean. Maybe they will make it an offshore reef so we can go fishing?


29 posted on 06/12/2005 5:09:15 AM PDT by JarheadFromFlorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

What a shame! They would be sorely missed. Not!


30 posted on 06/12/2005 5:24:59 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

good.

these people are thugs.


38 posted on 06/12/2005 7:28:52 AM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH
Yeah,I'm a dues-paying Teamsters member. I hate it. They offer little protection when management DOES try their crap (which unfortunately is too often), and of course the Teamster's political view is corrupt too.

I need a new job....

39 posted on 06/12/2005 7:39:27 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

The cool thing about the Service Employees is that if this happens, they don't have to put a lot of effort into writing their disaffiliation notice. They can just put out a copy of their letterhead and circle their initials.


43 posted on 06/12/2005 11:15:36 AM PDT by RichInOC (SEIU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TXBSAFH

http://www.neoperspectives.com/unions.htm

On unions and how they bankrupt american companies. Hope these unions dissovle and are destroyed.


44 posted on 06/12/2005 11:28:02 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/charterschoolsexplained.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson