The 'wall' between the Truth and the MSM telling it remains intact.
Is HRC on the board at the Times? The Times is willing to connect George Bush to anything slightly damaging.
Fox News didn't mention Gorelick on Brit Hume's show last night either. They reported the story as though the FBI were completely to blame.
Yep. There's the proof that Hillary, as first lady, appointed Gorelick. </sarcasm>
Jamie Gorelick was loyal to bill clinton, not to America. That was true of all his high-level appointments. He preferred corrupt, indictable felons, because they are more easily blackmailed, so their personal loyalty can be ensured.
blunder? BLUNDER???
How about Gorelick's enrichment over the Fannie Mae debacle?
I don't want some stupid Hillary "appointee" tied to something bad, I want the HILDEBEAST tied to it! Dammit!
It was staring them right in the face... and the MSM just moved right along!
-- snip --"A chilling new detail of U.S. intelligence failures emerged Thursday, when the Justice Department disclosed that about 20 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, a CIA official had blocked a memo intended to alert the FBI that two known Al Qaeda operatives had entered the country.
And the left had accused President Bush of having known about 9/11 beforehand
The CIA has been subject to congressional oversight since the mid '70s and the days of the Church Committee. What the h*ll have the members of the intelligence committees been doing through the years? They seem to know enough to leak info when it suits them.
"Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA":
http://hnn.us/articles/380.html
Gorelick wasn't the "eyes and ears at the justice dept" - SHE WAS RUNNING IT - BECAUSE RENO WAS TOTALLY INCOMPETENT.
Well of course the MSM wouldn't report anything that would remotely be hurtful to their queen, the wicked witch of the north. MSM is too busy pushing the tired old theme since Jan 2000: "Blame it on Bush!"
CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL by Mia T, 5.5.04
|
This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking. A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security. A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death. Some dare call it treason: |
Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall. Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism. While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis: Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect. The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant. Filegate and the clinton Putsch, The Common Man Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis. Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder. copyright Mia T 2004
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)
e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.
Mia T
February, 1998
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
also:
The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick
The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance
Memos show Gorelick involvement in 'wall'
Gorelick Agonistes
Her refusal to resign taints the 9/11 Commission
The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2
America's Real Two-Front War
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
This is going to leave a mark.
Might want to put some ice on that.