Posted on 06/10/2005 9:45:13 AM PDT by katieanna
The prosecutors in Michael Jackson’s child molestation and conspiracy case apparently feel they’ve already won their case. On Wednesday night, the whole lot of them — DA Tom Sneddon, Ron Zonen, Gordon Auchincloss, their wives and families — all celebrated at the Hitching Post restaurant in Casmalia.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
With the password that was not spoken.
Next.
I dunno, but you can bet your bottom dollar that some prison employees are going to get offered big, big bucks for some candid in-house photographs.
my thoughts exactly, you always jinx it if you celebrate too early, let's not forget this is not a sequestered jury, let's hope this is a mischaracterization, hello, perhas this is the celebration of a birthday, anniversary or promotion? even DAs have social live you know, how do we know they weren't celebrating another case?
Under the watchful eye of the man with no sight.
it freaked me out to read this for the same reason. lets not count our chickens til the fat lady sings.. ; )
Who knows ? Maybe they were celebrating somebody's birthday. Don't think Friedman's reporting has been very good thus far.
Maybe they climbed through the window, duh.
These pictures are actually in Jacko's bedroom?????
Ugly. The worst thing, though---what infuriated Gibson---was that Friedman tried to manipulate Gibson using statements that his father had made: a form of public blackmail involving Gibson's family. That was beyond a compromise of journalistic standards. It was a real criminal maneuver.
They did win, the entire world knows that Michael Jackson is a perverted evil human being.
Truthfully, where did that picture come from?
Did you create that?
(ahhh...very nice)
Late at night on the eighth day of the week...
(WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that these paintings contain nudity.)
I think this is pure assumption! Jeez.
These people are celebrating the TRIAL is over. But the "journalist" wants to stir the pot and creates an ASSUMPTION and reports as fact. hmmm, they don't have a history with that do they?
It's a beautifully painted peice, if I could get over the deeper meaning and perversion behind it.
>>>A fast verdict (ala OJ) favors the defense. But there's different theories on that I guess.. Depends on the case.>>>
Yes, most people want to be extra sure before sending someone to prison.
You could be right.
(hmmm...)
Prior to the twilight of the coming dawn...
" How will Michael Jackson look in prison w/o makeup, and with his nose falling off all the time? "
This was the topic of a serious panel discussion on one of the cables the other night.
The make up and wig will not be allowed.
The assumption by the panel was that Jackson does have a false nose.
He could wear the prosthesis in prison if it was medically required, but, not if it was just cosmetic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
