Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Times' Shaw: Do We Need PBS? - (time to pull the plug?)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | MAY 31, 2005 | CARL LIMBACHER & Staff

Posted on 06/09/2005 6:23:55 PM PDT by CHARLITE

The growing controversy over the Bush administration’s attempts to alter the perceived liberal bias in PBS programming has led one media insider to urge: Consider pulling the plug on the network.

In his Media Matters column in the Los Angeles Times, David Shaw asks, "Do we really want or need PBS anymore?"

Shaw points out that when PBS’s parent, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, was created in 1967, television was largely dominated by three commercial networks, while today we live in a "500-channel universe."

"But politics, not the availability of more alternatives, is the primary reason to question the continued viability of PBS," Shaw writes.

"PBS has become a political football, and in our increasingly polarized and poisonous political climate, that is not likely to change."

Republican Kenneth Tomlinson, the new chairman of the CPB, has been pressing PBS to correct what he views as a liberal bias, and he insists the CPB needs to take a more balanced approach to politics in order to attract a wider range of donors.

As NewMax.com reported on May 2, Tomlinson has stated: "I frankly feel at PBS headquarters there is a tone deafness to issues of tone and balance."

He recently hired the director of the White House Office of Global Communications as a senior staff member.

His choice for the CPB’s president and chief executive is Patricia Harrison, a former co-chairwoman of the Republican National Committee.

And last year he hired an outside consultant to monitor the political leanings of the PBS show "Now With Bill Moyers."

Democratic Reps. David Obey of Wisconsin and John Dingell of Michigan have called for an investigation into possible political interference at PBS.

"It’s not surprising that if the federal government is going to help finance public broadcasting, it may occasionally demand a say in the programming, even if public broadcasting is supposed to have editorial independence," Shaw writes.

"It’s that cliché come to TV life – let the governmental camel stick its nose inside the broadcast tent, and the entire camel, foul smell and all, may follow.

"So maybe it’s time to get rid of this particular tent and the camel as well, to do away with PBS and its unhappy status as a political football and political target."

Shaw adds that he’s not certain pulling the plug on PBS is the best solution, but says: "I think it’s at least worth discussing."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; cpb; defundpbs; funding; government; kenneth; kennethtomlinson; outdated; pbs; political; tomlinson

1 posted on 06/09/2005 6:23:56 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

pull the plug on the nea as well


2 posted on 06/09/2005 6:26:14 PM PDT by al baby (Father of the Beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Oh, yeah! Pull the plug! Especially if someone wants to hear a less-liberal...even conservative tone from PBS.

Better to kill it than fix it where it tells the truth. / < sarcasm>

3 posted on 06/09/2005 6:26:42 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Bush's move is brilliant...the libs would rather keep PBS liberal that take taxpayer dollars. (Bush is still way too liberal for me...but he has certainly advanced the ball in the correct direction)
4 posted on 06/09/2005 6:31:21 PM PDT by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I remember when PBS was "ETV" .
Nowadays, I notice that there are several commercial sponsors for some progrsms . Also, they have a monthly "begathon", wherein they solicit donstions from viewers . ain light of all that, why should there be ANY government subsidy for public television ?
They should "pull the plug "


5 posted on 06/09/2005 6:32:54 PM PDT by bdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

They'll just plug it back in after Hillary's elected.

(Aargh I triggered my own gag reflex).


6 posted on 06/09/2005 6:36:42 PM PDT by Argus (Omnia taglinea in tres partes divisa est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bdad
Also, they have a monthly "begathon",

You know, if PBS put stuff on the screen that was intellectually honest, they wouldn't have to beg.

7 posted on 06/09/2005 6:41:54 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Throw in NPR as well.


8 posted on 06/09/2005 7:08:48 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Now that it's apparent that the conservatives will soon be in control of PBS, the liberals are ready to cut it loose. I've been predicting this for some time.


9 posted on 06/09/2005 7:35:01 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; onedoug
"Now that it's apparent that the conservatives will soon be in control of PBS, the liberals are ready to cut it loose. I've been predicting this for some time."

Now, Brilliant, that really is BRILLIANT! I must be very slow tonight, because I didn't think of that angle, but you're absolutely right. Their turf is slipping out from under them, so they call for a shut down.

Thanks so much for your comments........and....I agree with you, onedoug. The NPR should either go off the air, or undergo a major overhaul.

Char :)

10 posted on 06/09/2005 10:06:30 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Their pledge week has become permapledge.

A time audit would reveal they advertise [including their "drives"] as much if not more than anyone else.

They unquestionably lean so far left Stalin looks like a rightwinger.

Bill Moyers was LBJ's hatchet man--but now that Republicans are positioned for executive positions the Dems are going cardiac.

And what do PBS' ratings indicate?

I posit they're losing share.

11 posted on 06/09/2005 10:13:48 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Both NEA's -


12 posted on 06/09/2005 10:15:09 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

And that would still be just a start


13 posted on 06/10/2005 6:43:27 AM PDT by al baby (Father of the Beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson