Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army to set new criteria for officers - Looser rules could attract up to 600 new officers
Baltimore Sun ^ | June 9, 2005 | Tom Bowman

Posted on 06/09/2005 1:44:50 PM PDT by 68skylark

Looser rules could attract up to 600 new officers; Growth amid recruiting problems; Reserve, National Guard work on similar program

WASHINGTON - Faced with a need to expand the Army and ease recruitment problems, Army officials have decided to loosen the requirements for junior officer candidates - accepting prospects who exceed the current age limit by more than a decade, and permitting more flexibility to waive their minor criminal or civil offenses, according to a memo obtained by The Sun.

The May 25 memo, sent to division commanders and other generals, said the Army hopes to attract 300 soldiers up to age 42 to attend Officer Candidate School and become second lieutenants. Using the same age criteria, they also hope to attract an additional 300 civilians with college degrees as officer candidates. The Army National Guard and Army Reserve are working on similar programs, according to the memo.

Like West Point or a college ROTC program, Officer Candidate School is an avenue to becoming an Army officer, involving a rigorous 14-week training program followed by the Officer Basic Course, which includes physical training, classroom study and field exercises. A second lieutenant could be a frontline officer in charge of a platoon of about 30 soldiers or hold various low-level command assignments.

The new criteria establish a clear departure from current requirements, which state that applicants should not reach their "29th birthday prior to training" and should be in "good moral standing." The average age for an OCS graduate is 27, Army officials said.

According to the memo, soldiers ages 18 to 42 may apply and division commanders may recommend waiving minor civil or military offenses. One Army official described an example as underage drinking that might have occurred before an enlistment....

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dod; ocs; recruitment; rotc; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I really like this reporter -- he seems to be one of the good apples in the bunch.

These changes make sense to me -- I'm glad to see the Army is being more flexible these days.

1 posted on 06/09/2005 1:44:51 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Firstcav
Are they thinking about this or doing it?

The way I read this article, it's a done deal.

3 posted on 06/09/2005 1:49:02 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

If you can stand up without falling backward, by God, its OCS for you!


4 posted on 06/09/2005 1:50:22 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: 68skylark

Tempting. I've thought about joining since 9/11 but was too old...


6 posted on 06/09/2005 1:53:01 PM PDT by tdewey10 (End abortion now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
A lot of people don't know that some states have their own, small military forces (separate from their National Guard organizations), and that these state defense forces have looser requirements to join. For example, in Indiana's state defense force, they'll accept applications for officer and enlisted positions up to age 50 from non-prior service individuals (and at even older ages for those with prior service).

To see if your state has this kind of opportunity, check here: State Guard Association listings.

7 posted on 06/09/2005 1:55:02 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Firstcav
Heck, I'll go back in as an officer.

I recently re-joined after a long break in service (though I'm still waiting to see if I can get my commission back). It's a real good time to be in uniform -- there are a lot of opportunities and a lot of "energy" in the force, and the work feels very "purposeful."

8 posted on 06/09/2005 1:58:40 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

GOING FROM 29 to 42, holy crap. Thats a 40 percent increase! Are things that bad, are we losing that many officers?


9 posted on 06/09/2005 1:59:09 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Today's 42 year olds seem a lot younger than they were. I think older officers could be a good thing.


10 posted on 06/09/2005 2:00:59 PM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Firstcav
"Heck, I'll go back in as an officer."

I'll second that!

11 posted on 06/09/2005 2:01:18 PM PDT by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick

Napoleon's Old Guard was pretty, well...old. And they were the most feared troops in Europe.


12 posted on 06/09/2005 2:01:32 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
Are things that bad, are we losing that many officers?

As I understand it, there's been an officer shortage brewing for years, mainly in the Guard and Reserve. It started in the early 1990's and it's been getting worse. This hasn't been in the news, and it's quite a different problem from the recent drop-off in recruiting from the mission in Iraq.

I'm surprised it's taken this long for the Army to start getting serious.

13 posted on 06/09/2005 2:03:09 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
Today's 42 year olds seem a lot younger than they were. I think older officers could be a good thing.

Yeah, that's a great point that isn't mentioned in this article.

Youth is an advantage for sustained, open combat against a strong adversary, but we don't have adversaries who take us on like that any more.

In contrast, peacekeeping and patrolling in various third-world sh**holes goes better with some age and maturity and restraint.

14 posted on 06/09/2005 2:05:48 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

A 42 year old second lieutenant strikes me as a mistake.


15 posted on 06/09/2005 2:07:03 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem
A 42 year old second lieutenant strikes me as a mistake.

I've seen some 22 yr old 2LT's that looked like high schoolers. Now that is scary.

16 posted on 06/09/2005 2:09:27 PM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I hear you. But for some tasks I think a 42-year old can be as good or better than a 22-year old.
17 posted on 06/09/2005 2:15:05 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Ping for later.


18 posted on 06/09/2005 2:16:25 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem

"A 42 year old second lieutenant strikes me as a mistake."

That would be an aberration of nature!
But really, I say that is a good plan because most 42 year old men would have some sense and maturity. If not..Oh S***!


19 posted on 06/09/2005 2:18:07 PM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

The title of this article could also be "Shake n Bake officers."


20 posted on 06/09/2005 2:19:41 PM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson