Posted on 06/07/2005 6:56:02 AM PDT by slowhand520
Interesting read I thought we'd all enjoy. LBJ makes Nixon look like a saint.
Johnsons Watergate LBJ vs. Goldwater.
By Lee Edwards
It was a political scandal of unprecedented proportions: the deliberate, systematic, and illegal misuse of the FBI and the CIA by the White House in a presidential campaign. The massive black-bag operations, bordering on the unconstitutional and therefore calling for impeachment, were personally approved by the president. They included planting a CIA spy in his opponent's campaign committee, wiretaps on his opponent's top political aides, illegal FBI checks, and the bugging of his opponent's campaign airplane.
The president? Lyndon B. Johnson. The target? Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona, the 1964 Republican presidential candidate.
Here are three examples of a presidential abuse of power for political purposes that constitute an even graver offense than Watergate.
In the fall of 1964, the White House turned to the CIA to get advance inside information about the Goldwater campaign, although the senator could hardly be described as a "domestic enemy" (the only valid excuse for agency action). E. Howard Hunt, later convicted for his part in the Watergate break-in, told a congressional committee a decade later that he was ordered to spy on Goldwater's headquarters. He said that President Johnson "had ordered this activity" and that White House aide Chester L. Cooper "would be the recipient of the information."
CIA Director William Colby admitted that Cooper prepared campaign material for Johnson and obtained advance texts of Goldwater speeches through a "woman secretary," clearly suggesting that the agency planted someone inside the Goldwater campaign organization.
The Democrats constantly used the covertly obtained information to undercut Goldwater initiatives. In early September, for example, the Goldwater campaign announced the formation of a Task Force on Peace and Freedom that the AP described as one of the most "unusual tactics in the history of American politics." Three hours before the Goldwater task force was unveiled, the White House announced that President Johnson had created a 16-member panel of leading authorities to consult with him on international problems. The White House announcement trumped the Goldwater plan. Democratic campaign speechwriter John Roche revealed that he and his colleagues got advance texts of Goldwater's major speeches. "When I innocently inquired how we got them," Roche said, "the reply was 'don't ask.'"
Goldwater's regional political directors were convinced that the telephones of the Republican national headquarters in Washington were bugged. At one private meeting aides discussed the possibility of a campaign stop by Goldwater in the Chicago area. Midwest director Sam Hay called the Republican chairman of Cook County, who agreed it was a good idea but promised to keep the trip confidential. Within the hour, a reporter called to say that he had heard Goldwater would be coming to town and wanted the details.
Senator Goldwater recalled that two correspondents once questioned him about a proposal not yet made public: that if elected, he would send Eisenhower to Vietnam to examine the situation and report back to him. Goldwater insisted he discussed the Eisenhower mission with only two members of his personal staff, but the two reporters swear they heard about it at the Johnson White House.
Most disturbing of all was the FBI's bugging of the Goldwater campaign plane where the senator and his inner circle often made their most confidential decisions. The bureau's illegal surveillance was confirmed by Robert Mardian, when he was an assistant attorney general in Nixon's first term.
During a two-hour conversation with J. Edgar Hoover in early 1971, Mardian asked about the procedures of electronic surveillance. To Mardian's amazement, Hoover revealed that in 1964 the FBI, on orders from the Oval Office, had bugged the Goldwater plane. Asked to explain the blatantly illegal action, Hoover said, "You do what the president of the United States orders you to do." William C. Sullivan, the bureau's number two man, confirmed to Mardian the spying operation against the Goldwater campaign.
Why did President Johnson order the Anti-Goldwater Campaign and illegally use both the CIA and the FBI as his personal political instruments? All the polls agreed he would win and by a handsome margin. But Johnson wanted the mother of all political landslides, eclipsing FDR's record presidential victory in 1936 and at the same time burying six feet deep Barry Goldwater and American conservatism. Johnson nearly succeeded in the first objective, receiving 61.5 percent of the popular vote, but miserably failed in the second.
Of all the men who have run for and lost the presidency in modern times, only Barry Goldwater and the central themes of his campaign were vindicated so quickly. Reviled and rejected in 1964 as no other presidential candidate in the 20th century, Goldwater was easily reelected to the U.S. Senate in 1968 while the president who had won by one of the largest margins in presidential politics dared not seek reelection. Just twelve years later, the Great Society was exposed as a trillion-dollar bust and Ronald Reagan, an unabashed conservative, became our 40th president.
Good post! I'll bookmark.
I was thinking the Clintons. Nixon and Johnson combined couldn't touch them with a ten foot pole when it comes to crimes in office. I believe that Hillary is still leading the pact of criminals in high places.
What's the point?
It's been proven beyond a doubt that Johnson did whatever it took to win, including dirty tricks and stuffing ballot boxes. He was a bully and many other bad things.
None of which excuses Nixon or his henchmen.
I read a book, I think the Author was Cato, but can't remember for sure, about Johnson. He was an interesting character. He was crooked from childhood. Also a physical coward.
When he stole his Senate seat, he was aided by Harry Truman, that icon of modern Democrats, and sadly, many Republicans.
When JFK (whatever you thought of him, the man was never a coward) asked LBJ to visit Vietnam for him in 1963, LBJ apparently physically quaked with fear. Typical reaction for a bully and a cheat. Neither the Washington Post nor CBS "News" were, of course, interested one bit in LBJ's criminality; it didn't further their political objectives.
Can I assume you are one of the Hillary voters on here from your comments? Comparing Nixon and LBJ -- not even close. Nixon covered for his staff because he was loyal to people around him -- LBJ was involved in every detail of bugging the Goldwater campaign and dirty tricks and that doesn't even include his micromanaging the the war in Vietnam.
Watergate was a 3rd rate burglarly at best -- LBJ bugged everything in the Goldwater campaign not to mention stealing ballot boxes in Texas in his first campaign for Senate.
Of course they were probably trying to catch them for political purposes rather than national security.
Of course I had to ask him about it.
He said Kennedy was liked by all of them. He also said he behaved well after his boat was sunk. On the other hand he said having your PT boat rammed by a ship was considered about as bad as it gets since they were the fastest thing on the water.
"What's the point?"
In my opinion, the point is that the Watergate story is a story about the media, not the Nixon presidency and administration. It shows that the media was already completely one-sided more than 30 years ago.
We now know that the "Watergate" many of us were raised on was BS. The real story is how a disgruntled federal employee feeding dirt to a Red-Diaper (Doper) Baby working for a major paper can bring down a government.
Trying to catch Democrats in treason, like criticizing Democrats caught red-handed in treason, is the worst sin of all in the eyes of the mainstream media.
No, actually, there is one worse sin. Trying to undermine the spread of communism in Latin America is probably the worst crime.
And the way that Woodward first met Felt in the basement room of the White House kind of sounds like a gay hookup to me. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Difficult to believe that the FBI and CIA would do anything illegal. (Caustic sarcasm)
I read "My Brother Lyndon" by Sam Houston Johnson. It recalls a number of his childhood shennanigans along with some oft overlooked perspectives on his life in the Whitehouse.
And where was Deep Throat back then?
There is some truth tho, that when your opponent is ignoring all the rules, that sometimes it is necessary to get dirty along with them, or lose.
I don't agree with that but it certainly is a mitigating factor.
And there really is no doubt that the dems were playing dirty first and were deeper in the dirt.
1. They or theirs have done it in spades.
2. They or theirs are in the middle of doing it.
The point is that the media completely ignored the corruption on the part of the Democrats, especially today in their retrospectives. Had Watergate pulled down a Dem president, every report on it on ABCBSNBCNN would have a disclaimer in the 2nd sentence about how "Of course previous Republican administrations had engaged in the same illegal activity." It isn't about excusing Nixon, but further exposing the media 'coverups'. There is such a thing as 'lying by ommission'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.