"Unless aware Americans act soon, the U.S. risks becoming a right-wing Christian theocracy along the lines of the fundamentalist Islamic states it most fears."
OK, that wins a Twilight Zone Award for delusional paranoia and shrill liberal insanity.
Posted on 06/03/2005 8:39:24 AM PDT by Heartofsong83
Christians capturing Tory party
Fri Jun 3 2005 FRANCES RUSSELL
CHRISTIAN. Jew. Muslim. Hindu. Buddhist. Agnostic. Atheist. Under Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, all have equal right to sit at the table of political power. But only if they respect democratic pluralism and the rights of others to hold different beliefs and values.
What worries a clear majority of Canadians is a peculiarly American strain of Christianity that clamours for its own religious freedom and rights, but squelches them for others.
It seeks political power for the express purpose of remaking the nation in its own rigid and authoritarian image.
It has taken over the Republican Party. Unless aware Americans act soon, the U.S. risks becoming a right-wing Christian theocracy along the lines of the fundamentalist Islamic states it most fears.
President George W. Bush's administration has now moved on one of the last major outposts of critical journalism, the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. The administration has stacked its board with appointees determined to stamp out that deadly American crime, "liberalism". To do so, it's trampling balance, too. Canadians are acutely aware of this. Like witnesses to a fatal crash, they watch, appalled, as the Christian Right seizes ever-greater control over political debate and thought in the Great Republic.
It sends chills up the spine.
This destruction of everything liberal democracy is supposed to stand for is a key reason Stephen Harper's Conservatives are sliding in the polls even as the Liberals plumb new depths of ethical and possibly criminal misbehaviour.
Last week, the Globe and Mail carried several articles on the Christian Right's successful capture of at least eight Conservative nominations in B.C., Ontario and Atlantic Canada. These candidates all have ties to the U.S. evangelical Christian movements now commanding the heights of the Republican Party. Focus on the Family and Promise Keepers talk glibly about openness and caring. But what they are really about is enforcing discrimination and patriarchy.
In the lead-up to last March's Conservative convention, Craig Chandler, a prominent evangelical Christian and social conservative, publicly urged Mr. Harper to follow the Bush Republicans.
"The re-election of U.S. President George W. Bush is a testament to the political activity and clout of evangelical Christians," Mr. Chandler, a prominent Conservative, said. "President Bush did not waver in his unequivocal support of social conservative positions. He was clearly pro-life and in favour of traditional marriage. He was not ashamed to proclaim his born-again Christianity in the public forum." Mr. Chandler also reminded Mr. Harper that it was social conservatives who had "organized to ensure he defeated Belinda Stronach, a well-known liberal who has successfully infiltrated the Conservative Party."
The week before the evangelicals' nominations were reported, Ms Stronach switched to the Liberals, turning her erstwhile love interest, Deputy Conservative leader Peter MacKay, into an instant media darling deserving of enormous public sympathy.
"Poor Peter" was shown with a too-new shovel and a too-clean white shirt, digging potatoes in his father's potato patch. "At least dogs are loyal," the sad-eyed MP said, sitting beside his border collie.
Ask David Orchard about real loyalty. And real betrayal. He thinks Mr. MacKay betrayed Canada by subsuming the Progressive Conservatives into a U.S. Republican-style party.
Contacted by phone at his Saskatchewan farm, he wouldn't comment on Mr. MacKay's lovelorn state. "I want to talk about the bigger issues."
Mr. Orchard was the 2003 Progressive Conservative leadership contender who put his rival, Mr. MacKay, over the top on the strength of the latter's "firm handshake...and his oral and written promises" not to merge the PCs with the Canadian Alliance.
For Mr. Orchard, the bigger issue is that Mr. MacKay betrayed the Canadian people by denying them a second centrist, Big Tent, governing party.
"Does this man have no memory of his firm handshake with me, of his oral and written promises to build the PC party as a viable alternative and not to merge it with the Canadian Alliance?" Mr. Orchard asked. "So that betrayal led to the destruction of Canada's oldest political party. It led to a denial of a moderate alternative to the voters of Canada. I don't think we've yet come to grips with the magnitude of what's happened in giving the great party that founded Canada away to the Canadian Alliance."
Today, he said, "Mr. Harper and the group around him, including University of Calgary political scientist Tom Flanagan and others, are in complete control and determined to integrate us deeper into the U.S... "The last election showed us that the votes just weren't there for Mr. Harper," Mr. Orchard continued. "As night follows day, there's got to be a reappraisal unless the party simply wants to stay in the wilderness forever."
As more Christian absolutists capture Conservative nominations, the party's choice between wilderness or reappraisal becomes stark.
FrancesRussell@mts.net
***This was recieved via e-mail, the web page is subscriber-only***
Those are NOT religious rights! Unless Canada has a King James version different from ours...?
Tell that to the left-wing activist groups...
I think it is more sinister than that. The left wants christians to have NO voice.
The left is basically establishing atheism as the official state religion. The author is basically going with the proposition that religion is the opiate of the masses.
It is also based on the assumption that the majority is NOT christian.
That is correct. They want government funded by the ACLU and other radical groups.
I wonder how many of the pro-homosexual "marriage" wackos are also the same people who used to believe overpopulation would have overwhelmed and destroyed the world in 2000.
(also nobody mentions world hunger anymore since there IS enough food produced to feed the world, the ONLY reason for starvation in pockets of the world is strict politics. Food as a weapon of tyrany.)
So, now they can't read? Or won't?
Correct.
What's shocking is this uproar is all about 8 electoral districts (out of 308) being reported to be bought by the Religious Right, when they were all DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED by the people in each district to run for the Conservative Party nomination. (There are definitely more districts that have strong so-cons running but these are all that are reported)
More and more, going around with blinders on, eh? What's the use in that? The logical end is to become a street person and wander around with tin foil on your head, talking to yourself in your own perfect little world.
["you" here is the hypothetical, not referring to you, Heartofsong83!]
Only A Canadian could think that CPB was important.
Be afraid, Frances, be VERY afraid!
"Unless aware Americans act soon, the U.S. risks becoming a right-wing Christian theocracy along the lines of the fundamentalist Islamic states it most fears."
OK, that wins a Twilight Zone Award for delusional paranoia and shrill liberal insanity.
Make sure you add Paul Martin and Jean Chretien to the Twilight Zone graphic!
Perhaps trading cards with career stats are in order.
I'm surpised they left out the part where students will be required to assent to the flat earth theory in American schools. [irony]
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Red Tories ARE Liberals. They just want any trace of conservatism off the table.
"What worries a clear majority of Canadians is a peculiarly American strain of Christianity that clamours for its own religious freedom and rights, but squelches them for others."
It is slander ... Freep the author folks.
Let me guess: the guy who wrote this wants to marry his boyfriend.
I stand corrected then. The womyn who wrote this wants to marry her womyn-companion-lover-bitch-mate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.